Films

Image © of Bence Szemerey via Pixabay

Everyone loves watching a good film albeit at the cinema or at home on the television etc.  With a collection of over 1000 DVDs that includes a LOT of films, it is clear to see that this is another big passion of mine.

I can’t remember the very first film I went to see at the pictures but it was in the mid-1970’s and it possibly could have been the Disney animation adaptation of Robin Hood.  Visits to the cinema over the decades as a child and older, with family have always held special memories for me. 

Watching a film on the telly is always good but nothing beats the experience and sound quality of watching it on the big screen.  Having a home cinema has always been a dream of mine but that probably won’t ever happen but one day I would like to get a decent surround sound system and projector with a large screen or a large telly to watch films on.  I will say never say never on that one!

I like most film genres with my favourite being Horror and Science Fiction ones.  I have favourite actors and actresses the same as anyone else does and they will be shown on this page.  I am not going to list every film I have watched in my lifetime, that would be IMPOSSIBLE to remember but I will list films I have watched and enjoyed that I think are worth watching for someone else but of course, your opinions may differ from mine, that’s life.

About Film

A film, also called a movie, motion picture, moving picture, picture, photoplay, or flick is a work of visual art that simulates experiences and otherwise communicates ideas, stories, perceptions, feelings, beauty, or atmosphere through the use of moving images. Flick is, in general, a slang term, first recorded in 1926.  It originates in the verb flicker, owing to the flickering appearance of early films.  These images are generally accompanied by sound and, more rarely, other sensory stimulations.   The word cinema, short for cinematography, is often used to refer to filmmaking and the film industry, and the art form that is the result of it. 

The History Of Film

Precursors

The art of film has drawn on several earlier traditions in fields such as oral storytelling, literature, theatre, and visual arts.  Forms of art and entertainment that have already featured moving or projected images include shadowgraphy (probably used since prehistoric times), camera obscura (a natural phenomenon that has possibly been used as an artistic aid since prehistoric times), shadow puppetry (possibly originated around 200 BCE in Central Asia, India, Indonesia or China) and the magic lantern (developed in the 1650’s,  this multi-media phantasmagoria shows that magic lanterns were popular from 1790 throughout the first half of the 19th century and could feature mechanical slides, rear projection, mobile projectors, superimposition, dissolving views, live actors, smoke that was sometimes used to project images upon, odours, sounds, and even electric shocks).

Before Celluloid

The stroboscopic animation principle was introduced in 1833 with the stroboscopic disc (better known as the phenakisticope) and later applied in the zoetrope (since 1866), the flip book (since 1868), and the praxinoscope (since 1877) before it became the basic principle for cinematography.

Image © of Simon Ritter von Stampfer via Wikipedia

Prof. Stampfer’s Stroboscopische Scheibe No. X., created on the 22nd of June, 1833.  This is side Nr. 10 of the reworked second series of Stampfer’s stroboscopic disc published by Trentsensky & Vieweg in the same year.

Experiments with early phenakisticope-based animation projectors were made at least as early as 1843 and publicly screened in 1847.  Jules Duboscq marketed phenakisticope projection systems in France from circa 1853 until the 1890’s.

Photography was introduced in 1839, but initially, photographic emulsions needed such long exposures that the recording of moving subjects seemed impossible.  At least as early as 1844, a photographic series of subjects posed in different positions was created to either suggest a motion sequence or document a range of different viewing angles.  The advent of stereoscopic photography, with early experiments in the 1840’s and commercial success since the early 1850’s, raised interest in completing the photographic medium with the addition of means to capture colour and motion.  In 1849, Joseph Plateau published the idea to combine his invention of the phenakisticope with the stereoscope, as suggested to him by stereoscope inventor Charles Wheatstone, and to use photographs of plaster sculptures in different positions to be animated in the combined device.  In 1852, Jules Duboscq patented such an instrument as the Stereoscope-fantascope, ou Bioscope, but he only marketed it very briefly, without success.  One Bioscope disc with stereoscopic photographs of a machine is in the Plateau collection of Ghent University, but no instruments or other discs have yet been found.

By the late 1850’s the first examples of instantaneous photography came about and provided hope that motion photography would soon be possible, but it took a few decades before it was successfully combined with a method to record a series of sequential images in real-time.  In 1878, Eadweard Muybridge eventually managed to take a series of photographs of a running horse with a battery of cameras in a line along the track and published the results as The Horse in Motion on cabinet cards.  Muybridge, as well as Etienne-Jules Marey, Ottomar Anschütz, and many others, would create many more chronophotography studies.  Muybridge had the contours of dozens of his chronophotographic series traced onto glass discs and projected them with his zoopraxiscope in his lectures from 1880 to 1895.

Image © of Eadweard Muybridge via Wikipedia

An animation of the retouched Sallie Garner card from The Horse in Motion series by Eadweard Muybridge.  The series was from 1878 – 1879. 

Anschutz made his first instantaneous photographs in 1881.  He developed a portable camera that allowed shutter speeds as short as 1/1000 of a second in 1882.  The quality of his pictures was generally regarded to be much higher than that of the chronophotography works of Muybridge and Etienne-Jules Marey.  In 1886, Anschutz developed the Electrotachyscope, an early device that displayed short motion picture loops with 24 glass plate photographs on a 1.5-meter-wide rotating wheel that was hand-cranked to the speed of circa 30 frames per second.  Different versions were shown at many international exhibitions, fairs, conventions, and arcades from 1887 until at least 1894.  Starting in 1891, some 152 examples of a coin-operated peep-box Electrotachyscope model were manufactured by Siemens & Halske in Berlin and sold internationally.  Nearly 34,000 people paid to see it at the Berlin Exhibition Park in the summer of 1892.  Others saw it in London or at the 1893 Chicago World’s Fair.  On the 25th of November 1894, Anschutz introduced an Electrotachyscope projector with a 6 x 8 meter screening in Berlin.  Between the 22nd of February and the 30th of March 1895, a total of circa 7,000 paying customers came to view a 1.5-hour show of some 40 scenes at a 300-seat hall in the old Reichstag building in Berlin.

Image © unknown via Wikipedia

A picture of Ottomar’s Anschutz’s electrotachyscope, first published in Scientific American on the 16th of November, 1889.

Emile Reynaud already mentioned the possibility of projecting the images of the Praxinoscope in his 1877 patent application.  He presented a praxinoscope projection device at the Societe Francaise de Photographie on the 4th of June 1880 but did not market his praxinoscope before 1882.  He then further developed the device into the Theatre Optique which could project longer sequences with separate backgrounds, patented in 1888.  He created several movies for the machine by painting images on hundreds of gelatin plates that were mounted into cardboard frames and attached to a cloth band.  From the 28th of October 1892 to March 1900 Reynaud gave over 12,800 shows to a total of over 500,000 visitors at the Grevin Museu in Paris.

First Motion Pictures

By the end of the 1880’s, the introduction of lengths of celluloid photographic film and the invention of motion picture cameras, which could photograph a rapid sequence of images using only one lens, allowed the action to be captured and stored on a single compact reel of film.

Movies were initially shown publicly to one person at a time through peep show devices such as the Electrotachyscope, Kinetoscope, and the Mutoscope.  Not much later, exhibitors managed to project films on large screens for theatre audiences.

The first public screenings of films at which admission was charged were made in 1895 by the American Woodville Latham and his sons, using films produced by their Eidoloscope company, by the Skladanowsky brothers, and by the arguably better known  French brothers Auguste and Louis Lumiere with ten of their own productions.  Private screenings had preceded these by several months, with Latham’s slightly predating the others.

Roundhay Garden Scene is a short silent motion picture filmed by French inventor Louis Le Prince at Oakwood Grange in Roundhay, Leeds, in northern England on the 14th of October 1888.

Pauvre Pierrot or Poor Pete as it is known in English is a French short animated film directed by Charles-Emile Reynaud in 1891 and was released in 1892. 

Georges Melies’ Le Voyage dans la Lune or A Trip to the Moon as it is known in English is an early narrative film and also an early science fiction film, released in 1902.

The Bond is a two-reel propaganda film created by Charlie Chaplin at his own expense for the Liberty Loan Committee to help sell U.S. Liberty Bonds during World War I, released in 1918. 

Early Evolution

The earliest films were simply one static shot that showed an event or action with no editing or other cinematic techniques.  Typical films showed employees leaving a factory gate, people walking in the street, and the view from the front of a trolley as it traveled a city’s Main Street.  According to legend, when a film showed a locomotive at high speed approaching the audience, the audience panicked and ran from the theater.  Around the turn of the 20th century, films started stringing several scenes together to tell a story.  The filmmakers who first put several shots or scenes discovered that, when one shot follows another, that act establishes a relationship between the content in the separate shots in the minds of the viewer.  It is this relationship that makes all film storytelling possible.  In a simple example, if a person is shown looking out a window, whatever the next shot shows, it will be regarded as the view the person was seeing.  Each scene was a single stationary shot with the action occurring before it.  The scenes were later broken up into multiple shots photographed from different distances and angles.  Other techniques such as camera movement were developed as effective ways to tell a story with film.  Until sound film became commercially practical in the late 1920’s, motion pictures were purely visual art, but these innovative silent films had gained a hold on the public imagination.  Rather than leave audiences with only the noise of the projector as an accompaniment, theater owners hired a pianist or organist or, in large urban theaters, a full orchestra to play music that fit the mood of the film at any given moment. By the early 1920’s, most films came with a prepared list of sheet music to be used for this purpose, and complete film scores were composed for major productions.

The rise of European cinema was interrupted by the outbreak of World War I, while the film industry in the United States flourished with the rise of Hollywood, typified most prominently by the innovative work of D. W. Griffith in The Birth of a Nation (1915) and Intolerance (1916).  However, in the 1920’s, European filmmakers such as Eisenstein, F. W. Murnau, and Fritz Lang, in many ways inspired by the meteoric wartime progress of film through Griffith, along with the contributions of Charles Chaplin, Buster Keaton, and others, quickly caught up with American film-making and continued to further advance the medium.

Sound

In the 1920’s, the development of electronic sound recording technologies made it practical to incorporate a soundtrack of speech, music, and sound effects synchronized with the action on the screen.  The resulting sound films were initially distinguished from the usual silent moving pictures or movies by calling them talking pictures or talkies.  The revolution they wrought was swift.  By 1930, silent film was practically extinct in the US and already being referred to as the old medium.

The evolution of sound in cinema began with the idea of combining moving images with existing phonograph sound technology.  Early sound-film systems, such as Thomas Edison’s Kinetoscope and the Vitaphone used by Warner Bros., laid the groundwork for synchronized sound in film.  The Vitaphone system, produced alongside Bell Telephone Company and Western Electric, faced initial resistance due to expensive equipping costs, but sound in cinema gained acceptance with movies like Don Juan (1926) and The Jazz Singer (1927).

American film studios, while Europe standardized on Tobis-Klangfilm and Tri-Ergon systems.  This new technology allowed for greater fluidity in film, giving rise to more complex and epic movies like King Kong (1933).

As the television threat emerged in the 1940’s and 1950’s, the film industry needed to innovate to attract audiences.  In terms of sound technology, this meant the development of surround sound and more sophisticated audio systems, such as Cinerama’s seven-channel system.  However, these advances required a large number of personnel to operate the equipment and maintain the sound experience in cinemas.

In 1966, Dolby Laboratories introduced the Dolby A noise reduction system, which became a standard in the recording industry and eliminated the hissing sound associated with earlier standardization efforts.  Dolby Stereo, a revolutionary surround sound system, followed and allowed cinema designers to take acoustics into consideration when designing cinemas.  This innovation enabled audiences in smaller venues to enjoy comparable audio experiences to those in larger city cinemas.

Today, the future of sound in film remains uncertain, with potential influences from artificial intelligence, remastered audio, and personal viewing experiences shaping its development.  However, it is clear that the evolution of sound in cinema has been marked by continuous innovation and a desire to create more immersive and engaging experiences for audiences.

Colour

A significant technological advancement in the film industry was the introduction of natural colour, where colour was captured directly from nature through photography, as opposed to being manually added to black-and-white prints using techniques like hand-coloring or stencil-coloring.  Early colour processes often produced colours that appeared far from natural.  Unlike the rapid transition from silent films to sound films, colour’s replacement of black-and-white happened more gradually.

The crucial innovation was the three-strip version of the Technicolor process, first used in animated cartoons in 1932.  The process was later applied to live-action short films, specific sequences in feature films, and finally, to an entire feature film, Becky Sharp, in 1935.  Although the process was expensive, the positive public response, as evidenced by increased box office revenue, generally justified the additional cost.  Consequently, the number of films made in color gradually increased year after year.

The 1950’s: The Growing Influence Of Television

In the early 1950’s, the proliferation of black-and-white television started seriously depressing North American cinema attendance.  In an attempt to lure audiences back into cinemas, bigger screens were installed, widescreen processes, polarised 3D projection, and stereophonic sound were introduced, and more films were made in colour, which soon became the rule rather than the exception.  Some important mainstream Hollywood films were still being made in black-and-white as late as the mid-1960’s, but they marked the end of an era.  Colour television receivers had been available in the U.S. since the mid-1950’s, but at first, they were very expensive and few broadcasts were in colour.  During the 1960’s, prices gradually came down, colour broadcasts became common, and sales boomed.  The overwhelming public verdict in favour of colour was clear.  After the final flurry of black-and-white films had been released in mid-decade, all Hollywood studio productions were filmed in colour, with the usual exceptions made only at the insistence of star filmmakers such as Peter Bogdanovich and Martin Scorsese.

The 1960’s And Later

The decades following the decline of the studio system in the 1960’s saw changes in the production and style of film.  Various New Wave movements (including the French New Wave, New German Cinema wave, Indian New Wave, Japanese New Wave, New Hollywood, and Egyptian New Wave) and the rise of film-school-educated independent filmmakers contributed to the changes the medium experienced in the latter half of the 20th century.  Digital technology has been the driving force for change throughout the 1990’s and into the 2000’s.  Digital 3D projection largely replaced earlier problem-prone 3D film systems and has become popular in the early 2010’s. 

Image © unknown via Wikipedia

Salah Zulfikar, one of the most popular actors in the golden age of Egyptian Cinema.

Etymology And Alternative Terms

The name film originally referred to the thin layer of photochemical emulsion on the celluloid strip that used to be the actual medium for recording and displaying motion pictures.

The most common term in Europe is film while in the United States,  movie is preferred.

Archaic terms include animated pictures and animated photography. Common terms for the field, in general, include the big screen, the silver screen, the movies, and cinema.  The last of these is commonly used, as an overarching term, in scholarly texts and critical essays.  In the early years, the word sheet was sometimes used instead of screen.

Recording And Transmission Of The Film

The moving images of a film are created by photographing actual scenes with a motion-picture camera, by photographing drawings or miniature models using traditional animation techniques, by means of C.G.I. and computer animation, or by a combination of some or all of these techniques, and other visual effects.

Before the introduction of digital production, a series of still images were recorded on a strip of chemically sensitised celluloid (photographic film stock), usually at a rate of 24 frames per second.  The images are transmitted through a movie projector at the same rate as they were recorded, with a Geneva drive ensuring that each frame remains still during its short projection time.  A rotating shutter causes stroboscopic intervals of darkness, but the viewer does not notice the interruptions due to flicker fusion.  The apparent motion on the screen is the result of the fact that the visual sense cannot discern the individual images at high speeds, so the impressions of the images blend with the dark intervals and are thus linked together to produce the illusion of one moving image.  An analogous optical soundtrack (a graphic recording of the spoken words, music, and other sounds) runs along a portion of the film exclusively reserved for it and is not projected.

Contemporary films are usually fully digital through the entire process of production, distribution, and exhibition.

Film Theory

Film theory seeks to develop concise and systematic concepts that apply to the study of film as art.  The concept of film as an art-form began in 1911 with Ricciotto Canudo’s manifest The Birth of the Sixth Art.  The Moscow Film School, the oldest film school in the world, was founded in 1919, in order to teach about and research film theory.  Formalist film theory, led by Rudolf Arnheim, Bela Balazs, and Siegfried Kracauer, emphasized how film differed from reality and thus could be considered a valid fine art.  Andre Bazin reacted against this theory by arguing that film’s artistic essence lay in its ability to mechanically reproduce reality, not in its differences from reality, and this gave rise to realist theory.  More recent analysis spurred by Jacques Lacan’s psychoanalysis and Ferdinand de Saussure’s semiotics among other things has given rise to psychoanalytic film theory, structuralist film theory, feminist film theory, and others.  On the other hand, critics from the analytical philosophy tradition, influenced by Wittgenstein, try to clarify misconceptions used in theoretical studies and produce analysis of a film’s vocabulary and its link to a form of life.

Image © Janke via Wikipedia

The Bolex H16 Reflex camera.

Language

Film is considered to have its own language.  James Monaco wrote a classic text on film theory, titled How to Read a Film, that addresses this.  Director Ingmar Bergman famously said, “Andrei Tarkovsky for me is the greatest director, the one who invented a new language, true to the nature of film, as it captures life as a reflection, life as a dream.”  An example of the language is a sequence of back and forth images of one speaking actor’s left profile, followed by another speaking actor’s right profile, then a repetition of this, which is a language understood by the audience to indicate a conversation.  This describes another theory of film, the 180-degree rule, as a visual story-telling device with an ability to place a viewer in a context of being psychologically present through the use of visual composition and editing.  The Hollywood style includes this narrative theory, due to the overwhelming practice of the rule by movie studios based in Hollywood, California, during film’s classical era.  Another example of cinematic language is having a shot that zooms in on the forehead of an actor with an expression of silent reflection that cuts to a shot of a younger actor who vaguely resembles the first actor, indicating that the first person is remembering a past self, an edit of compositions that causes a time transition.

Montage

Read more about Montage here.

Montage is a film editing technique in which separate pieces of film are selected, edited, and assembled to create a new section or sequence within a film.  This technique can be used to convey a narrative or to create an emotional or intellectual effect by juxtaposing different shots, often for the purpose of condensing time, space, or information.  Montage can involve flashbacks, parallel action, or the interplay of various visual elements to enhance the storytelling or create symbolic meaning.

The concept of montage emerged in the 1920’s, with pioneering Soviet filmmakers such as Sergei Eisenstein and Lev Kuleshov developing the theory of montage. Eisenstein’s film Battleship Potemkin (1925) is a prime example of the innovative use of montage, where he employed complex juxtapositions of images to create a visceral impact on the audience. 

As the art of montage evolved, filmmakers began incorporating musical and visual counterpoint to create a more dynamic and engaging experience for the viewer.  The development of scene construction through mise-en-scène, editing, and special effects led to more sophisticated techniques that can be compared to those utilized in opera and ballet.

The French New Wave movement of the late 1950’s and 1960’s also embraced the montage technique, with filmmakers such as Jean-Luc Godard and François Truffaut using montage to create distinctive and innovative films.  This approach continues to be influential in contemporary cinema, with directors employing montage to create memorable sequences in their films.

In contemporary cinema, montage continues to play an essential role in shaping narratives and creating emotional resonance.  Filmmakers have adapted the traditional montage technique to suit the evolving aesthetics and storytelling styles of modern cinema:

Rapid editing and fast-paced montages: With the advent of digital editing tools, filmmakers can now create rapid and intricate montages to convey information or emotions quickly.  Films like Darren Aronofsky’s Requiem for a Dream (2000) and Edgar Wright’s Shaun of the Dead (2004) employ fast-paced editing techniques to create immersive and intense experiences for the audience.

Music video influence: The influence of music videos on film has led to the incorporation of stylized montage sequences, often accompanied by popular music.  Films like Guardians of the Galaxy (2014) and Baby Driver (2017) use montage to create visually striking sequences that are both entertaining and narratively functional.

Sports and training montages: The sports and training montage has become a staple in modern cinema, often used to condense time and show a character’s growth or development.  Examples of this can be found in films like Rocky (1976), The Karate Kid (1984), and Million Dollar Baby (2004).

Cross-cutting and parallel action: Contemporary filmmakers often use montage to create tension and suspense by cross-cutting between parallel storylines.  Christopher Nolan’s Inception (2010) and Dunkirk (2017) employ complex cross-cutting techniques to build narrative momentum and heighten the audience’s emotional engagement.

Thematic montage: Montage can also be used to convey thematic elements or motifs in a film.  Wes Anderson’s The Royal Tenenbaums (2001) employs montage to create a visual language that reflects the film’s themes of family, nostalgia, and loss.

As the medium of film continues to evolve, montage remains an integral aspect of visual storytelling, with filmmakers finding new and innovative ways to employ this powerful technique.

Film Criticism

Film criticism is the analysis and evaluation of films.  In general, these works can be divided into two categories, academic criticism by film scholars and journalistic film criticism that appears regularly in newspapers and other media.  Film critics working for newspapers, magazines, and broadcast media mainly review new releases.  Normally they only see any given film once and have only a day or two to formulate their opinions.  Despite this, critics have an important impact on the audience response and attendance at films, especially those of certain genres.  Mass marketed action, horror, and comedy films tend not to be greatly affected by a critic’s overall judgment of a film.  The plot summary and description of a film and the assessment of the director’s and screenwriters’ work that makes up the majority of most film reviews can still have an important impact on whether people decide to see a film.  For prestige films such as most dramas and art films, the influence of reviews is important.  Poor reviews from leading critics at major papers and magazines will often reduce audience interest and attendance.

The impact of a reviewer on a given film’s box office performance is a matter of debate.  Some observers claim that movie marketing in the 2000’s is so intense, well-coordinated and well financed that reviewers cannot prevent a poorly written or filmed blockbuster from attaining market success.  However, the cataclysmic failure of some heavily promoted films which were harshly reviewed, as well as the unexpected success of critically praised independent films indicates that extreme critical reactions can have considerable influence.  Other observers note that positive film reviews have been shown to spark interest in little-known films.  Conversely, there have been several films in which film companies have so little confidence that they refuse to give reviewers an advanced viewing to avoid widespread panning of the film.  However, this usually backfires, as reviewers are wise to the tactic and warn the public that the film may not be worth seeing and the films often do poorly as a result.  Journalist film critics are sometimes called film reviewers.  Critics who take a more academic approach to films, through publishing in film journals and writing books about films using film theory or film studies approaches, study how film and filming techniques work, and what effect they have on people.  Rather than having their reviews published in newspapers or appearing on television, their articles are published in scholarly journals or up-market magazines.  They also tend to be affiliated with colleges or universities as professors or instructors.

In 1986, Roger Ebert, winner of the Pulitzer Prize for Criticism said, “If a movie can illuminate the lives of other people who share this planet with us and show us not only how different they are but, how even so, they share the same dreams and hurts, then it deserves to be called great.”

Industry

Read more about Industry here. Read more about World Cinema

The making and showing of motion pictures became a source of profit almost as soon as the process was invented.  Upon seeing how successful their new invention, and its product, was in their native France, the Lumieres quickly set about touring the Continent to exhibit the first films privately to royalty and publicly to the masses.  In each country, they would normally add new, local scenes to their catalogue and, quickly enough, found local entrepreneurs in the various countries of Europe to buy their equipment and photograph, export, import, and screen additional product commercially.  The Oberammergau Passion Play of 1898 was the first commercial motion picture ever produced.  Other pictures soon followed, and motion pictures became a separate industry that overshadowed the vaudeville world.  Dedicated theaters and companies formed specifically to produce and distribute films, while motion picture actors became major celebrities and commanded huge fees for their performances. By 1917 Charlie Chaplin had a contract that called for an annual salary of one million dollars.  From 1931 to 1956, film was also the only image storage and playback system for television programming until the introduction of videotape recorders.

In the United States, much of the film industry is centered around Hollywood, California.  Other regional centers exist in many parts of the world, such as Mumbai-centered Bollywood, the Indian film industry’s Hindi cinema which produces the largest number of films in the world.  Though the expense involved in making films has led cinema production to concentrate under the auspices of movie studios, recent advances in affordable film making equipment have allowed independent film productions to flourish.

Profit is a key force in the industry, due to the costly and risky nature of filmmaking; many films have large cost overruns, an example being Kevin Costner’s Waterworld.  Yet many filmmakers strive to create works of lasting social significance.  The Academy Awards (also known as the Oscars) are the most prominent film awards in the United States, providing recognition each year to films, based on their artistic merits (but it has got so woke lately that is questionable indeed).   There is also a large industry for educational and instructional films made in lieu of or in addition to lectures and texts.   Revenue in the industry is sometimes volatile due to the reliance on blockbuster films released in movie theaters.  The rise of alternative home entertainment has raised questions about the future of the cinema industry, and Hollywood employment has become less reliable, particularly for medium and low-budget films.

World Cinema

Read more about World Cinema here.

World cinema is a term in film theory that refers to films made outside of the American motion picture industry, particularly those in opposition to the aesthetics and values of commercial American cinema.  The Third Cinema of Latin America and various national cinemas are commonly identified as part of world cinema.  The term has been criticized for Americentrism and for ignoring the diversity of different cinematic traditions around the world.

Image © unknown via Wikipedia

Most productive cinemas around the world based on IMDb (as of 2009).  Over 10,000 titles (green), over 5,000 (yellow), over 1,000 (blue).

Associated Fields

Read more about Film theory here, Product placement here, and Propaganda here.

Derivative academic fields of study may both interact with and develop independently of filmmaking, as in film theory and analysis.  Fields of academic study have been created that are derivative or dependent on the existence of film, such as film criticism, film history, divisions of film propaganda in authoritarian governments, or psychological on subliminal effects (e.g., of a flashing soda can during a screening).  These fields may further create derivative fields, such as a movie review section in a newspaper or a television guide.  Sub-industries can spin off from film, such as popcorn makers, and film-related toys (e.g., Star Wars figures).  Sub-industries of pre-existing industries may deal specifically with film, such as product placement and other advertising within films.

Terminology

The terminology used for describing motion pictures varies considerably between British and American English.  In British usage, the name of the medium is film.  The word movie is understood but seldom used.  Additionally, the pictures (plural) is used semi-frequently to refer to the place where movies are exhibited, while in American English this may be called the movies, but it is becoming outdated.  In other countries, the place where movies are exhibited may be called a cinema or movie theatre.  By contrast, in the United States, movie is the predominant form.  Although the words film and movie are sometimes used interchangeably, film is more often used when considering artistic, theoretical, or technical aspects.  The term movies more often refers to entertainment or commercial aspects, such as where to go for a fun evening on a date.  For example, a book titled How to Understand a Film would probably be about the aesthetics or theory of film, while a book entitled Let’s Go to the Movies would probably be about the history of entertaining movies and blockbusters.

Further terminology is used to distinguish various forms and media used in the film industry.  Motion pictures and moving pictures are frequently used terms for film and movie productions specifically intended for theatrical exhibition, such as, for instance, Star Wars. DVD and videotape are video formats that can reproduce a photochemical film.  A reproduction based on such is called a transfer.  After the advent of theatrical film as an industry, the television industry began using videotape as a recording medium.  For many decades, the tape was solely an analogue medium onto which moving images could be either recorded or transferred.  Film and filming refer to the photochemical medium that chemically records a visual image and the act of recording respectively.  However, the act of shooting images with other visual media, such as with a digital camera, is still called filming and the resulting works are often called films as interchangeable with movies, despite not being shot on film.  Silent films need not be utterly silent but are films and movies without an audible dialogue, including those that have a musical accompaniment.  The word, Talkies, refers to the earliest sound films created to have audible dialogue recorded for playback along with the film, regardless of a musical accompaniment.  Cinema either broadly encompasses both films and movies, or it is roughly synonymous with film and theatrical exhibition, and both are capitalised when referring to a category of art.  The silver screen refers to the projection screen used to exhibit films and, by extension, is also used as a metonym for the entire film industry.

Widescreen refers to a larger width to height in the frame, compared to earlier historic aspect ratios.  A feature-length film, or feature film, is of a conventional full length, usually 60 minutes or more, and can commercially stand by itself without other films in a ticketed screening.  A short is a film that is not as long as a feature-length film, often screened with other shorts, or preceding a feature-length film.  An independent is a film made outside the conventional film industry.

In U.S. usage, one talks of a screening or projection of a movie or video on a screen at a public or private theatre.  In British English, a film showing happens at a cinema, never a theatre, which is a different medium and place altogether.  A cinema usually refers to an arena designed specifically to exhibit films, where the screen is affixed to a wall, while a theatre usually refers to a place where live, non-recorded action or combination thereof occurs from a podium or other type of stage, including the amphitheatre.  Theatres can still screen movies in them, though the theatre would be retrofitted to do so.  One might propose going to the cinema when referring to the activity, or sometimes to the pictures in British English, whereas the U.S. expression is usually going to the movies.  A cinema usually shows a mass-marketed movie using a front-projection screen process with either a film projector or, more recently, with a digital projector.  But, cinemas may also show theatrical movies from their home video transfers that include Blu-ray Disc, DVD, and videocassette when they possess sufficient projection quality or based upon need, such as movies that exist only in their transferred state, which may be due to the loss or deterioration of the film master and prints from which the movie originally existed.  Due to the advent of digital film production and distribution, physical film might be absent entirely.  A double feature is a screening of two independently marketed, stand-alone feature films.  A viewing is a watching of a film.  Sales and at the box office refer to tickets sold at a theatre, or more currently, rights sold for individual showings.  A release is the distribution and often simultaneous screening of a film.  A preview is a screening in advance of the main release.

Any film may also have a sequel, which portrays events following those in the film.  Bride of Frankenstein is an early example.  When there are more films than one with the same characters, story arcs, or subject themes, these movies become a series, such as the James Bond series.  And, existing outside a specific story timeline usually, does not exclude a film from being part of a series.  A film that portrays events occurring earlier in a timeline with those in another film, but is released after that film, is sometimes called a prequel, an example being Butch and Sundance: The Early Days.

The credits, or end credits, are a list that gives credit to the people involved in the production of a film.  Films from before the 1970’s usually start a film with credits, often ending with only a title card, saying The End or some equivalent, often an equivalent that depends on the language of the production.  From then onward, a film’s credits usually appear at the end of most films.  However, films with credits that end a film often repeat some credits at or near the start of a film and therefore appear twice, such as that film’s acting leads, while less frequently some appearing near or at the beginning only appear there, not at the end, which often happens to the director’s credit.  The credits appearing at or near the beginning of a film are usually called titles or beginning titles.  A post-credits scene is a scene shown after the end of the credits.  Ferris Bueller’s Day Off has a post-credit scene in which Ferris tells the audience that the film is over and they should go home.

A film’s cast refers to a collection of the actors and actresses who appear, or star, in a film.  A star is an actor or actress, often a popular one, and in many cases, a celebrity who plays a central character in a film.  Occasionally the word can also be used to refer to the fame of other members of the crew, such as a director or other personality, such as Martin Scorsese.  A crew is usually interpreted as the people involved in a film’s physical construction outside cast participation, and it could include directors, film editors, photographers, grips, gaffers, set decorators, prop masters, and costume designers.  A person can both be part of a film’s cast and crew, such as Woody Allen, who directed and starred in Take the Money and Run.

A film goer, movie goer, or film buff is a person who likes or often attends films and movies, and any of these, though more often the latter, could also see oneself as a student of films and movies.  Intense interest in films, film theory, and film criticism, is known as cinephilia.  A film enthusiast is known as a cinephile or cineaste.

Preview

Read more about Test screening here.

A preview performance refers to a showing of a film to a select audience, usually for the purposes of corporate promotions, before the public film premiere itself.  Previews are sometimes used to judge audience reaction, which if unexpectedly negative, may result in recutting or even refilming certain sections based on the audience response.  One example of a film that was changed after a negative response from the test screening is 1982’s First Blood.  After the test audience responded very negatively to the death of protagonist John Rambo (a Vietnam veteran) at the end of the film, the company wrote and re-shot a new ending in which the character survives.

Trailer And Teaser

Read more about the Film trailer here.

Trailers or previews are advertisements for films that will be shown in 1 to 3 months at a cinema.  Back in the early days of cinema, with cinemas that had only one or two screens, only certain trailers were shown for the films that were going to be shown there.  Later, when cinemas added more screens or new cinemas were built with a lot of screens, all different trailers were shown even if they were not going to play that film in that cinema.  Film studios realised that the more trailers that were shown (even if it was not going to be shown in that particular cinema) the more patrons would go to a different cinema to see the film when it came out.  The term trailer comes from their having originally been shown at the end of a film.  That practice did not last long because patrons tended to leave the theatre after the films ended, but the name stuck.  Trailers are now shown before the film, or when the first film in a double feature begins.  Film trailers are also common on DVD’s and Blu-ray Discs, as well as on the Internet and mobile devices.  Trailers are created to be engaging and interesting for viewers.  As a result, in the Internet era, viewers often seek out trailers to watch them.  Of the ten billion videos watched online annually in 2008, film trailers ranked third, after news and user-created videos.  Teasers are a much shorter preview or advertisement that lasts only 10 to 30 seconds.  Teasers are used to get patrons excited about a film coming out in the next six to twelve months.  Teasers may be produced even before the film production is completed.

The Role Of Film In Culture

Films are cultural artefacts created by specific cultures, facilitating intercultural dialogue.  It is considered to be an important art form that provides entertainment and historical value, often visually documenting a period of time.  The visual basis of the medium gives it a universal power of communication, often stretched further through the use of dubbing or subtitles to translate the dialogue into other languages. Just seeing a location in a film is linked to higher tourism to that location, demonstrating how powerful the suggestive nature of the medium can be.

Education And Propaganda

Read more about Educational films here and Propaganda films here.

Film is used for a range of goals, including education and propaganda due to its ability to effectively intercultural dialogue.  When the purpose is primarily educational, a film is called an educational film.  Examples are recordings of academic lectures and experiments, or a film based on a classic novel.  Film may be propaganda, in whole or in part, such as the films made by Leni Riefenstahl in Nazi Germany, U.S. war film trailers during World War II, or artistic films made under Stalin by Sergei Eisenstein.  They may also be works of political protest, as in the films of Andrzej Wajda, or more subtly, the films of Andrei Tarkovsky.  The same film may be considered educational by some, and propaganda by others as the Film is used for a range of goals, including education and propaganda due to its ability to effectively intercultural dialogue. When the purpose is primarily educational, a film is called an educational film. Examples are recordings of academic lectures and experiments, or a film based on a classic novel. Film may be propaganda, in whole or in part, such as the films made by Leni Riefenstahl in Nazi Germany, U.S. war film trailers during World War II, or artistic films made under Stalin by Sergei Eisenstein. They may also be works of political protest, as in the films of Andrzej Wajda, or more subtly, the films of Andrei Tarkovsky.  The same film may be considered educational by some, and propaganda by others as the categorisation of a film can be subjective.

Production

Read more about Filmmaking here

At its core, the means to produce a film depend on the content the filmmaker wishes to show, and the apparatus for displaying it e.g. the zoetrope merely requires a series of images on a strip of paper.  Film production can, therefore, take as little as one person with a camera, or even without a camera, as in Stan Brakhage’s 1963 film Mothlight, or thousands of actors, extras, and crew members for a live-action, feature-length epic.  The necessary steps for almost any film can be boiled down to conception, planning, execution, revision, and distribution.  The more involved the production, the more significant each of the steps becomes.  In a typical production cycle of a Hollywood-style film, these main stages are defined as development, pre-production, production, post-production and distribution.

This production cycle usually takes three years.  The first year is taken up with development.  The second year comprises preproduction and production.  The third year, post-production and distribution.  The bigger the production, the more resources it takes, and the more important financing becomes.  Most feature films are artistic works from the creators’ perspective, e.g., film directors, cinematographers, screenwriters and for-profit business entities for the production companies.

Crew

Read more about the Film crew here.

A film crew is a group of people hired by a film company, and employed during the production or photography phase, for the purpose of producing a film or motion picture.  Crew is distinguished from cast, who are the actors who appear in front of the camera or provide voices for characters in the film.  The crew interacts with but is also distinct from the production staff, consisting of producers, managers, company representatives, their assistants, and those whose primary responsibility falls in the pre-production or post-production phases, such as screenwriters and film editors.  Communication between production and crew generally passes through the director and his/her staff of assistants.  Medium-to-large crews are generally divided into departments with well-defined hierarchies and standards for interaction and cooperation between the departments.  Other than acting, the crew handles everything in the photography phase such as props and costumes, shooting, sound, electrics, i.e., lights, sets, and production special effects.  Caterers (known in the film industry as craft services) are usually not considered part of the crew.

Technology

Read more about Cinema Techniques here.

Film stock consists of transparent celluloid, acetate, or polyester base coated with an emulsion containing light-sensitive chemicals.  Cellulose nitrate was the first type of film base used to record motion pictures, but due to its flammability was eventually replaced by safer materials.  Stock widths and the film format for images on the reel have had a rich history, though most large commercial films are still shot on (and distributed to theatres) as 35 mm prints.  Originally moving picture film was shot and projected at various speeds using hand-cranked cameras and projectors; though 1000 frames per minute (162/3 frame/s) is generally cited as a standard silent speed, research indicates most films were shot between 16 frame/s and 23 frame/s and projected from 18 frame/s on up (often reels included instructions on how fast each scene should be shown).  When synchronised sound film was introduced in the late 1920’s, a constant speed was required for the sound head.  24 frames per second was chosen because it was the slowest (and thus cheapest) speed which allowed for sufficient sound quality.  The standard was set with Warner Bros.’s The Jazz Singer and their Vitaphone system in 1927.  Improvements since the late 19th century include the mechanisation of cameras which allows them to record at a consistent speed and quiet camera design thus allowing sound recorded on-set to be usable without requiring large blimps to encase the camera, the invention of more sophisticated filmstocks and lenses, allowing directors to film in increasingly dim conditions, and the development of synchronized sound, allowing sound to be recorded at exactly the same speed as its corresponding action.  The soundtrack can be recorded separately from shooting the film, but many parts of the soundtrack are usually recorded simultaneously for live-action pictures.

As a medium, film is not limited to motion pictures, since the technology developed as the basis for photography.  It can be used to present a progressive sequence of still images in the form of a slideshow. Film has also been incorporated into multimedia presentations and often has importance as primary historical documentation.  However, historic films have problems in terms of preservation and storage, and the motion picture industry is exploring many alternatives.  Most films on cellulose nitrate base have been copied onto modern safety films. Some studios save colour films through the use of separation masters which are three B&W negatives each exposed through red, green, or blue filters (essentially a reverse of the Technicolor process).  Digital methods have also been used to restore films, although their continued obsolescence cycle makes them (as of 2006) a poor choice for long-term preservation.  Film preservation of decaying film stock is a matter of concern to both film historians and archivists and to companies interested in preserving their existing products in order to make them available to future generations (and thereby increase revenue).  Preservation is generally a higher concern for nitrate and single-strip color films, due to their high decay rates; black-and-white films on safety bases and color films preserved on Technicolor imbibition prints tend to keep up much better, assuming proper handling and storage.

Some films in recent decades have been recorded using analogue video technology similar to that used in television production.  Modern digital video cameras and digital projectors are gaining ground as well.  These approaches are preferred by some film-makers, especially because footage shot with digital cinema can be evaluated and edited with non-linear editing systems (N.L.E.) without waiting for the film stock to be processed.  The migration was gradual, and as of 2005, most major motion pictures were still shot on film.

Independent

Read more about Independent film here.

Independent filmmaking often takes place outside Hollywood or other major studio systems.  An independent film (or indie film) is a film initially produced without financing or distribution from a major film studio.  Creative, business and technological reasons have all contributed to the growth of the indie film scene in the late 20th and early 21st century.  On the business side, the costs of big-budget studio films also lead to conservative choices in cast and crew.  There is a trend in Hollywood towards co-financing (over two-thirds of the films put out by Warner Bros. in 2000 were joint ventures, up from 10% in 1987).  A hopeful director is almost never given the opportunity to get a job on a big-budget studio film unless he or she has significant industry experience in film or television.  Also, the studios rarely produce films with unknown actors, particularly in lead roles.

Before the advent of digital alternatives, the cost of professional film equipment and stock was also a hurdle to being able to produce, direct, or star in a traditional studio film.  The advent of consumer camcorders in 1985, and more importantly, the arrival of high-resolution digital video in the early 1990’s, have lowered the technology barrier to film production significantly. Both production and post-production costs have been significantly lowered.  In the 2000’s, the hardware and software for post-production could be installed in a commodity-based personal computer.  Technologies such as DVD’s, FireWire connections and a wide variety of professional and consumer-grade video editing software make film-making relatively affordable.

Since the introduction of digital video D.V. technology, the means of production have become more democratised.  Filmmakers can conceivably shoot a film with a digital video camera and edit the film, create and edit the sound and music, and mix the final cut on a high-end home computer.  However, while the means of production may be democratised, financing, distribution, and marketing remain difficult to accomplish outside the traditional system.  Most independent filmmakers rely on film festivals to get their films noticed and sold for distribution.  The arrival of internet-based video websites such as YouTube and Veoh has further changed the filmmaking landscape, enabling indie filmmakers to make their films available to the public.

Image © unknown via Wikipedia

The Lumiere Brothers were among the first filmmakers.

Open Content Film

Read more about Open content film here.

An open-content film is much like an independent film, but it is produced through open collaborations.  Its source material is available under a license which is permissive enough to allow other parties to create fan fiction or derivative works, than a traditional copyright.  Like independent filmmaking, open source filmmaking takes place outside Hollywood or other major studio systems.  For example, the film Balloon was based on a real event during the Cold War.

Fan Film

Read more about Fan films here.

A fan film is a film or video inspired by a film, television program, comic book or a similar source, created by fans rather than by the source’s copyright holders or creators.  Fan filmmakers have traditionally been amateurs, but some of the most notable films have actually been produced by professional filmmakers as film school class projects or as demonstration reels.  Fan films vary tremendously in length, from short faux-teaser trailers for non-existent motion pictures to rarer full-length motion pictures.

Distribution

Read more about Film distribution here and Film release here.

Film distribution is the process through which a film is made available for viewing by an audience.  This is normally the task of a professional film distributor, who would determine the marketing strategy of the film, the media by which a film is to be exhibited or made available for viewing, and may set the release date and other matters.  The film may be exhibited directly to the public either through a cinema (historically the main way films were distributed) or television for personal home viewing including on DVD-Video or Blu-ray Disc, video-on-demand, online downloading, television programs through broadcast syndication etc.  Other ways of distributing a film include rental or personal purchase of the film in a variety of media and formats, such as VHS tape or DVD, or Internet downloading or streaming using a computer.

Animation

Read more about Animation here.

Animation is a technique in which each frame of a film is produced individually, whether generated as a computer graphic (by photographing a drawn image), or by repeatedly making small changes to a model unit (see
claymation and stop motion), and then photographing the result with a special animation camera.  When the frames are strung together and the resulting film is viewed at a speed of 16 or more frames per second, there is an illusion of continuous movement (due to the phi phenomenon).  Generating such a film is very labour-intensive and tedious, though the development of computer animation has greatly sped up the process. Because animation is very time-consuming and often very expensive to produce, the majority of animation for television and films comes from professional animation studios.  However, the field of independent animation has existed at least since the 1950’s, with animation being produced by independent studios and sometimes by a single person.  Several independent animation producers have gone on to enter the professional animation industry.

Limited animation is a way of increasing production and decreasing the costs of animation by using shortcuts in the animation process.  This method was pioneered by U.P.A. and popularized by Hanna-Barbera in the United States, and by Osamu Tezuka in Japan, and adapted by other studios as cartoons moved from movie theatres to television.  Although most animation studios are now using digital technologies in their productions, there is a specific style of animation that depends on film.  Camera-less animation, made famous by filmmakers like Norman McLaren, Len Lye, and Stan Brakhage, is painted and drawn directly onto pieces of film, and then run through a projector.

 

Image © Janke via Wikipedia

Further Information

Blog Posts

Films: Angel Studios.

Films: Sound Of Freedom.

Films: Tim Ballard.

Notes And Links

Article source: Wikipedia and is subject to change.

Bence Szemerey on Pexels
– The image shown at the top of this page is the copyright of Bence Szemerey.  You can find more great work from the photographer Bence and lots more free stock photos at Pexels.

The Prof. Stampfer’s Stroboscopische Scheibe No. X animation above is the copyright of Simon Ritter von Stampfer and is in the public domain.

The Horse In Motion animation above is the copyright of Eadweard Muybridge and is in the public domain.

The image above of a picture of Ottomar’s Anschutz’s electrotachyscope is  copyright unknown as is in the public domain.

The video above of Roundhay Garden Scene is in the public domain.  You can read more about the film by clicking here.

The video above of Pauvre Pierrot is in the public domain.  You can read more about the film by clicking here.

The video above of Le voyage dans la lune is in the public domain.  You can read more about the film by clicking here.

The video above of The Bond is in the public domain.  You can read more about the film by clicking here.

The image above of a picture of Salah Zulfikar, is  copyright unknown as is in the public domain.

The image above of The Bolex H16 Reflex camera is the copyright of Wikipedia user Janke and is in the public domain.   

The image above of The Most Productive Cinemas Around The World is copyright unknown via Wikipedia.   It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 3.0).

The image above of The Lumiere Brothers is copyright unknown as is in the public domain.

The image above of an Animated Horse is the copyright of Wikipedia user Janke and is in the public domain.  It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 2.5).

Creative Commons – Official website.  They offer better sharing, advancing universal access to knowledge and culture, and fostering creativity, innovation, and collaboration. 

IMDb – Official website.   IMDb is an online database of information related to films, television series, podcasts, home videos, video games, and streaming content online, including cast, production crew and personal biographies, plot summaries, trivia, ratings, and fan and critical reviews.   

IMDb on Facebook.

IMDb on Twitter.

IMDb on YouTube.

Wikipedia – Official website.  Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit in good faith. Its purpose is to benefit readers by containing information on all branches of knowledge.  Hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, it consists of freely editable content, whose articles also have numerous links to guide readers to more information.

Birmingham City: A Tribute To Trevor Francis

Image © of B.C.F.C.

There is only one team in Birmingham worth supporting with true passion and Birmingham City is it.  I have been supporting them since 1979 when Jim Smith was the manager.  I was 13 at the time.  He is my favourite manager to date.   I am a blue nose ’til I die.

You can read lots more about Blues by clicking here.

The 24th of July 2023 was a day of shock and sadness for those associated with Birmingham City Football Club, Trevor Francis had died. Trevor wore the number 10 shirt and was certainly the most well-known player for B.C.F.C. and adored by many.  You can read more about him here.

I never got to see him play in person.  I was only in my early teens when I started supporting Blues and could only dream of going to St. Andrews but I saw him on television work his magic on the pitch.  He was at the end of his Blues career when I first started following Jim Smith and the Lads.  I can’t exactly recall when it was but it was around the time he was sold to Nottingham Forest as the first million player in British history.  I continued to watch him for Forest cementing my love for them and their manager Brian Clough.  Forest automatically became my second team until Clough retired in 1993. 

R.I.P.

Tributes From The Club 

On the 24th of July 2023 there was an announcement by Birmingham City informing the passing of Trevor Francis.  The Blues badge was changed to black as a mark of respect to the great man.

Image © of B.C.F.C.
Image © of B.C.F.C.
Image © of B.C.F.C.
Image © of B.C.F.C.
Image © of B.C.F.C.
Image © of B.C.F.C.
Image © of B.C.F.C.
Image © Unknown
Image © Unknown

The above two photos were posted on Jude Bellingham’s Twitter account on 24/07/23.  This is what he  wrote:

“A very sad day for @BCFC and all of football. Beyond legendary, a trailblazer, a great and an icon of the game. The only thing that could exceed his quality and accolades on the pitch was his class off it. Thank you for all the guidance and the benchmarks you set. Rest in peace, King Trevor! “ 💙

Image © of B.C.F.C.

Players and staff from Blues Men’s and Women’s First Team paying their respects to Trevor Francis on 25/07/23.

On 27/07/23 there was an announcement from Blues that there would be a Trevor Francis Book of Condolence at the Library of Birmingham on the 28th and 29th of July.  This should have been longer than two days in my opinion.

Image © of B.C.F.C.
Image © of B.C.F.C.
Image © of B.C.F.C.

Garry Cook signs the Trevor Francis Book of Condolence at the Library of Birmingham on 29/07/23.

Image © of B.C.F.C.

Blues players paying their respects to Trevor Francis at Peterborough United on 29/07/23.

Image © of B.C.F.C.

Blues fans at Peterborough United on 29/07/23.

Birmingham City Fans Tribute Area 

Click here to watch John Eustace and Darren Carter lay a reef in respect of Trevor Francis. This was the start of many flowers, scarves etc. that were placed in the designated area towards the Ticket Office at St. Andrew’s for fans to pay tribute to a club legend from 24/07/23 – 07/08/23.  The tributes are now safely in storage.

Image © of B.C.F.C.
Image © of B.C.F.C.
Image © of B.C.F.C.
Image © of B.C.F.C.

Fan tributes left for Trevor Francis at St. Andrews.

Videos From The Club 

The following videos (not including shorts) are from Birmingham City’s YouTube page and appear in order they were first shown.  There are too many videos of such a legend elsewhere to show here but search in your favourite browser and see for yourself what a great man he was.

Club Celebration 

On the 11th of August, 2023, the club announced that they will be celebrating Trevor Francis’s life at the first home game of the 2023/24 season against Leeds United. 

Image © of B.C.F.C.
Image © of B.C.F.C.
Image © of B.C.F.C.
Image © of B.C.F.C.

Jasper Carrott pays tribute to his good friend Trevor Francis.

Image © of B.C.F.C.
Image © of B.C.F.C.

A celebration to Trevor Francis at Blues first home game of the 2023/24 season against Leeds United.  

Trevor Francis Statue Announcement  

Trevor Francis Statue Announcement
Image © of B.C.F.C.

Trevor Francis statue announcement.

On the 24th of July, 2024,  Birmingham City made an announcement about the commission of a Trevor Francis statue by  Douglas Jennings M.R.B.S., a globally acclaimed portrait sculptor.

Read more here.

Read more about Francis here.

Read more about Jennings here.

Trevor Francis Memorial Match 

On the 24th of July, 2024, one year after Trevor’s passing Birmingham City hosted Rangers in the Trevor Francis Memorial Match.

Birmingham City Legend Trevor Francis
Image © of B.C.F.C.

Birmingham City legend Trevor Francis.

Trevor Francis In His Birmingham City And Rangers Tops
Image © of B.C.F.C.

Trevor Francis in his Birmingham City and Rangers tops.

Garry Cook Pays Tribute To The Late, Great Trevor Francis

Click here for Chief Executive Officer Garry Cook’s tribute to the late, great Trevor Francis. 

Trevor Francis Memorial Match Interviews

For Chris Davies’s interview after the Trevor Francis Memorial Match click here.

For Ethan Laird’s interview click here.

Trevor Francis Memorial Match Highlights  

For match highlights of the Trevor Francis Memorial Match click here.

Rest In Peace Trevor and thanks for all the great memories and your service to Birmingham City.

KEEP RIGHT ON

Blog Posts

Notes And Links

The image shown at the top of this page is copyright of Birmingham City F.C.  

The images of Trevor Francis and Jude Bellingham with Trevor Francis are copyright unknown.

Birmingham City F.C. – Official website.  

Birmingham City on Facebook  – This is their official Facebook page.

Birmingham City on Twitter – This is their official Twitter page.

Birmingham City on YouTube – This is their official YouTube page.

Blues Store Online – Birmingham City’s official club store online.

Wikipedia – Official website.  Its purpose is to benefit readers by acting as a widely accessible and free encyclopedia that contains information on all branches of knowledge. Funded and hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, Wikipedia consists of freely editable content whose articles also provide numerous links to guide readers to related pages with more information. 

Birmingham Mail – Official website.  The Birmingham Mail is a newspaper based in Birmingham, England but distributed around Birmingham, the Black Country, Solihull and parts of Warwickshire, Worcestershire and Staffordshire. 

Birmingham City: Trevor Francis

Image © of B.C.F.C.

There is only one team in Birmingham worth supporting with true passion and Birmingham City is it.  I have been supporting them since 1979 when Jim Smith was the manager.  I was 13 at the time.  He is my favourite manager to date.   I am a blue nose ’til I die.

You can read lots more about Blues by clicking here.

The 24th of July 2023 was a day of shock and sadness for those associated with Birmingham City Football Club, Trevor Francis had died. Trevor wore the number 8 shirt and was certainly the most well-known player for B.C.F.C., adored by many.  You can read my tribute page to him here.

I never got to see him play in person.  I was only in my early teens when I started supporting Blues and could only dream of going to St. Andrews but I saw him on television work his magic on the pitch.  He was at the end of his Blues career when I first started following Jim Smith and the Lads.  I can’t exactly recall when it was but it was around the time he was sold to Nottingham Forest as the first million player in British history.  I continued to watch him for Forest cementing my love for them and their manager Brian Clough.  Forest automatically became my second team until Clough retired in 1993. 

R.I.P. Trevor. 

Image © of B.C.F.C.

About Trevor Francis 

Trevor Francis was an English footballer who played as a forward for a number of clubs in England, the United States, Italy, Scotland and Australia.  In 1979 he became Britain’s first £1 million player following his transfer from Birmingham City to Nottingham Forest.  He scored the winning goal for Forest in the 1979 European Cup final against Malmö.  He won the European Cup again with the club the following year.  At international level, he played for England 52 times between 1976 and 1986, scoring 12 goals, and played at the 1982 FIFA World Cup.

Between 1988 and 2003, Francis was a football manager with Queens Park Rangers, Sheffield Wednesday, Birmingham City and Crystal Palace.

Image © of Hans van Dijk via Wikipedia

Trevor Francis in Amsterdam on the 22nd Of April 1980.  He was playing for Nottingham Forest at the time.

Early Life And Education

Trevor John Francis was born on the 19th of April 1954, in Plymouth, Devon, and educated at Plymouth’s Public Secondary School for Boys.  He was an agile and skilful forward and joined Birmingham City as a schoolboy.

Club Career

Birmingham City

Francis quickly rose in status, making his debut for Birmingham City’s first team in 1970, aged just 16.  His talent was noted when, before his 17th birthday, he scored four goals in a match against Bolton Wanderers.  He ended his first season with 15 goals from just 22 games.  Birmingham City manager at the time, Freddie Goodwin, compared Francis to both Jimmy Greaves and Denis Law.

On the 30th of October 1976, he scored one of Birmingham’s most famous goals, when he turned away from the touchline and cut inside two Queens Park Rangers defenders, constantly being forced backwards before suddenly unleashing a 25-yard (23 meters) shot. 

Detroit Express

Francis negotiated a loan from Birmingham in 1978 to play for the Detroit Express in the North American Soccer League where he scored 22 goals in 19 league matches and was named to the N.A.S.L. first XI alongside Franz Beckenbauer and Giorgio Chinaglia before returning home to the Midlands.

Nottingham Forest

Nottingham Forest, the reigning First Division champions and League Cup holders managed by Brian Clough, put in a bid for Francis which totalled just over £1 million.  No player had ever been sold between English clubs for a seven-figure fee before and the deal was sealed, with Francis famously being introduced to the media by a manager impatient to play squash.  Clough was in his red gym kit and carrying a racquet as he addressed the press conference.

While recognised as the first British million-pound player, the actual transfer fee for the player was £1,150,000, including a 15% commission to the Football League.  Clough wrote in his autobiography that the fee was £999,999, as he wanted to ensure the million-pound milestone did not go to the player’s head, although Francis says that was a tongue-in-cheek remark by Clough.

Nottingham Forest retained the League Cup shortly afterwards without the cup-tied Francis and made progress in the European Cup to the extent that they reached the semi-finals, although Francis was not eligible to play in the competition until the final.  They won their semi-final, and in May 1979 Forest took on Swedish club Malmö in the final in Munich, and a major instalment of the huge investment money was repaid just before half time.

The ball was spread to Forest’s winger John Robertson wide on the left and he took on two defenders at once to reach the byline and curl an awkward, outswinging cross towards the far post.  Francis had already begun to sprint into position, but even so, he had to increase his pace in order to reach the cross as it dropped and ended up throwing himself low at the ball.  He connected with his head and the ball diverted powerfully into the roof of the net.  Forest won the match 1–0 and footage of the goal was used in the opening titles to Match of the Day for some years afterwards.  A giant picture of Francis stooping to head the ball remains on display in the main entrance and reception area of Forest’s City Ground stadium.

Even though the season ended there, Francis duly headed back to Detroit for another summer playing in the N.A.S.L., where once again he was named to the first XI alongside Johan Cruyff (Los Angeles Aztecs) and Giorgio Chinaglia (New York Cosmos), despite playing only half the season.  In his brief career in America, Francis scored 36 goals in 33 regular season matches and had 18 assists.

At Nottingham Forest Clough frequently played Francis on the right wing, rather than in his preferred position as a central attacker.  Francis was in the side which lost the 1980 League Cup Final to Wolverhampton Wanderers but missed the European Cup Final against Hamburg due to an injury to his Achilles tendon.  Somehow the success of his Forest career never quite reflected his huge fee.  He scored only 14 league goals in the 1979 – 80 season and 6 in the next 18 games that he played for Forest.  Although still a regular for England, his Achilles injury prevented him from being in the squad for the 1980 European Championships.

Manchester City

The injury kept Francis out of the game for over six months.  He was sold to Manchester City in September 1981, this time for £1.2 million.  The deal caused behind-the-scenes friction at Manchester City.  During negotiations City chairman Peter Swales informed manager John Bond that the club could not afford the transfer fee.  Bond then issued an ultimatum which was if Francis did not sign, Bond would resign.  Francis made a promising start at the club, scoring two goals against Stoke City on his debut, but over the course of the season, he was frequently injured.  In total, he scored 12 goals in 26 games and made the England squad for the 1982 World Cup.

Back at his club, financial problems were again an issue.  Francis’ contract gave him a salary of £100,000 plus bonuses, which the club could no longer afford to pay to a player who regularly sustained injuries.

Sampdoria

Later that summer, Francis was approached by Italian club Sampdoria, who paid Manchester City £700,000 for his services.  He helped win the 1984–85 Coppa Italia, in the same team as Scotland midfielder Graeme Souness.  It was the first time that Sampdoria had won the competition.

Atalanta

Francis joined Atalanta in 1986.  He played 21 league games and scored once in his only season, but added two goals in nine games in the Coppa Italia. Atalanta lost the final to Napoli.  He was the second Englishman at the Bergamo-based club after Gerry Hitchens, and by the time of his death, their only other English-born player was Ademola Lookman.

Rangers

Francis returned to Britain in September 1987 to join Rangers under Graeme Souness.  Numerous English players were brought to the Scottish club by Souness as English clubs had been banned from European competition since the Heysel disaster.  Francis cost just £75,000, signed on a pay-as-you-play basis, and won the 1987 – 88 Scottish League Cup, scoring a penalty in the shootout.

Queens Park Rangers

Francis signed for Queens Park Rangers on a free transfer in March 1988 and helped the team finish fifth in the First Division.  He scored 10 goals from 26 appearances in the first half of the 1988 – 89 season and took over as player-manager in December 1988 when Jim Smith moved to Newcastle United, but a knee injury in January 1989 put an end to his playing season.  He marked his return to the field in September 1989 with a hat-trick against Aston Villa, but was replaced as manager by Don Howe in November 1989 and his playing contract was paid up a few days later.

During his time at Queens Park Rangers, Francis completed a brief loan in 1988 with an Australian National Soccer League team, Wollongong City, as part of businessman Harry Michaels’ attempt to market football in Australia.  Michaels had previously funded the loans of Alan Brazil and Paul Mariner, whom Francis was to replace, and had discussions with Norman Whiteside, Nigel Clough and Michel Platini about playing for the New South Wales-based team.

Sheffield Wednesday

Francis left Queens Park Rangers in February 1990 to play for Sheffield Wednesday.  Despite gaining a good reputation amongst supporters, he could not help the club avoid relegation to the second tier under manager Ron Atkinson for the 1990 – 91 season.  However, that season he helped Wednesday win the League Cup, although he was a non-playing substitute in the final, and also gained promotion back to the top flight.

International Career

Francis played for England 52 times between 1977 and 1986 and scored 12 goals.  In 1977, he was given his first England cap by Don Revie, in a 2 – 0 loss against the Netherlands.  After missing out on Euro 1980 due to an Achilles injury, Francis was named in the England squad for the 1982 World Cup in Spain.  In the first round of the tournament, he scored in the group games against Czechoslovakia and Kuwait.  England was eliminated after goalless draws against both the host nation and West GermanyIn the spring of 1986, he made his 52nd and final appearance for England in a victory over Scotland and was subsequently not selected for the 1986 World Cup in Mexico.

Managerial Career

Sheffield Wednesday

After the departure of Ron Atkinson, Francis took over as manager of Sheffield Wednesday with popular support from the club and supporters.  He guided Wednesday to a third-place finish in 1992.  The following year, Wednesday reached the F.A. Cup and League Cup finals, losing both to Arsenal, the former after a replay.  In 1994, Francis finally retired as a player, shortly before his 40th birthday.  He was dismissed as manager a year later after Wednesday finished 13th in the Premiership.

In February 1992, Francis brought former French international Eric Cantona back from a poor discipline-enforced hiatus in his career by inviting him for a trial at Sheffield Wednesday.  However, as the snowy conditions meant that he could only evaluate Cantona on AstroTurf, Francis requested an extension to the trial to see whether Cantona could play on grass.  An outraged Cantona walked out on The Owls and was signed (without a trial) by Leeds United, inspiring first them and then Manchester United to success.  In a 2012 interview, Francis said that he had agreed to take Cantona on as a favour to Francis’ former agent, Dennis Roach, and Michel Platini, who he knew from his time playing in Italy when they approached him about taking on Cantona, and that it was intended as an opportunity for Cantona to put himself in the shop window.  Wednesday had only recently been promoted back to the top flight, with most of the squad still being on Second Division-level wages, and the club could not afford to sign him.

Birmingham City

Francis was hired as Birmingham City as manager in 1996, with the club in the First Division.  He guided Birmingham to a 10th and 7th place finish in his first two seasons, missing out on the playoffs on goal difference in the latter.  Finishes of 4th, 4th and 5th in the next three seasons resulted in playoff entry, losing each time.

Francis led Blues to the 2001 League Cup Final, where they lost on penalties to Liverpool.  He was dismissed in October of that year.  BBC Sport wrote “Francis the player was legendary. Francis the manager is the nearly man.”

Crystal Palace

Francis was manager of Crystal Palace from November 2001 to April 2003.  He was appointed by Crystal Palace chairman, Simon Jordan to replace Steve Bruce who had resigned as Crystal Palace manager with the intention of taking the manager’s role at Birmingham City.  Litigation followed with Bruce being placed on gardening leave.  Of the appointment, Jordan said, “The last two or three weeks have not been easy.  I’m bored of Steve Bruce and Birmingham and what I’m interested in is Trevor Francis and Crystal Palace.”  At the time Francis said that he had turned down four jobs before accepting the role at Crystal Palace.  Under his managership, Palace defeated a Gerard Houllier-managed Liverpool in an FA Cup fourth-round replay at Anfield in February 2003 and beat Palace’s main rivals, Brighton & Hove Albion, 5 – 0 in October 2002.  However, after the team’s second failure to achieve promotion to the Premier League, Simon Jordan dismissed him, stating: “People know I am very unhappy with the selection of our players under Francis. We have a very strong squad and we should have done a lot better this season – a lot of lessons need to be learned from injury prevention and transfer policy.”

Personal Life

Francis married Helen in 1974.  The couple had two children together.  On the 5th of April 2017, it was reported that Helen Francis had died.

On the 13th of April 2012, Francis was reported to be recovering in hospital from a suspected heart attack.

Francis died of a heart attack at his home near Marbella, Spain, on July 24th, 2023.  He was 69.  

Image © Christophe95 via Wikipedia

Trevor Francis in 2009.

Career And Managerial Statistics

Click here to read about Francis’ club, international and managerial statistics.

Honours

Player

Birmingham City

Football League Second Division runner-up: 1971 – 72.

Detroit Express

American Conference Central Division: 1978.

Nottingham Forest

European Cup: 1978 – 79 and 1979 – 80.

European Super Cup: 1979.

Football League Cup: runner-up 1979 – 80.

Sampdoria

Coppa Italia: 1984 – 85.

Rangers

Scottish League Cup: 1987 – 88.

Sheffield Wednesday

Football League Cup: 1990 – 91.

Individual

P.F.A. First Division Team of the Year: 1976 – 77, 1977 – 78, and 1981 – 82.

Coppa Italia top scorer: 1984 – 85 (9 goals).

Manager

Sheffield Wednesday

F.A. Cup runner-up: 1992–93.

Football League Cup runner-up: 1992 – 93.

Birmingham City

Football League Cup runner-up: 2000 – 01.

Individual

Premier League Manager of the Month: December 1993.

Read more about Trevor Francis’ Wikipedia page here.

Blog Posts

Notes And Links

The image shown at the top of this page is copyright of Birmingham City F.C.  

The image above of Trevor Francis In Amsterdam In 1980 is the copyright of  Hans van Dijk via Wikipedia.  It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC0 1.0and is in the Public Domain. 

The image above of Trevor Francis in 2009 is the copyright of Wikipedia user Christophe95.  It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 3.0).  You can find more great work from him by clicking here.

The above links in the Before Knighthead section will take you to Wikipedia and its content is subject to change.

Birmingham City F.C. – Official website.  

Birmingham City on Facebook  – This is their official Facebook page.

Birmingham City on Twitter – This is their official Twitter page.

Birmingham City on YouTube – This is their official YouTube page.

Blues Store Online – Birmingham City’s official club store online.

Wikipedia – Official website.  Its purpose is to benefit readers by acting as a widely accessible and free encyclopedia that contains information on all branches of knowledge. Funded and hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, Wikipedia consists of freely editable content whose articles also provide numerous links to guide readers to related pages with more information. 

Birmingham Mail – Official website.  The Birmingham Mail is a newspaper based in Birmingham, England but distributed around Birmingham, the Black Country, Solihull and parts of Warwickshire, Worcestershire and Staffordshire. 

Games: Nostalgic U.K. Games And Toys Adverts – Volume 4

Image © of Suzy Hazelwood via Pexels

There are games and toys shown in the ads below that people have kept from their childhood I am sure or wish they could have again to add to their retro collection.  These adverts will bring back happy memories for many.

The following adverts are from the 1980’s and 1990’s but may have the odd 1970’s thrown in.

These adverts are more entertaining than a lot of the drivel that is put on TV these days.  Enjoy your trip down memory lane.

Categories

Blog Posts

Notes And Links

Suzy Hazelwood on Pexels – The image shown at the top of this page is the copyright of Suzy Hazelwood.  You can find more great work from the photographer Suzy and lots more free stock photo’s at Pixabay.

RetroSteveUK on YouTube.

RetroSteveUK on Facebook.

RetroSteveUK on Twitter.

Games: Nostalgic U.K. Games And Toys Adverts – Volume 3

Image © of Suzy Hazelwood via Pexels

There are games and toys shown in the ads below that people have kept from their childhood I am sure or wish they could have again to add to their retro collection.  These adverts will bring back happy memories for many.

The following adverts are from the 1980’s and 1990’s but may have the odd 1970’s thrown in.

These adverts are more entertaining than a lot of the drivel that is put on TV these days.  Enjoy your trip down memory lane.

Categories

Blog Posts

Notes And Links

Suzy Hazelwood on Pexels – The image shown at the top of this page is the copyright of Suzy Hazelwood.  You can find more great work from the photographer Suzy and lots more free stock photo’s at Pixabay.

RetroSteveUK on YouTube.

RetroSteveUK on Facebook.

RetroSteveUK on Twitter.

Games: Nostalgic U.K. Games And Toys Adverts – Volume 2

Image © of Suzy Hazelwood via Pexels

There are games and toys shown in the ads below that people have kept from their childhood I am sure or wish they could have again to add to their retro collection.  These adverts will bring back happy memories for many.

The following adverts are from the 1980’s and 1990’s but may have the odd 1970’s thrown in.

These adverts are more entertaining than a lot of the drivel that is put on TV these days.  Enjoy your trip down memory lane.

Categories

Blog Posts

Notes And Links

Suzy Hazelwood on Pexels – The image shown at the top of this page is the copyright of Suzy Hazelwood.  You can find more great work from the photographer Suzy and lots more free stock photo’s at Pixabay.

RetroSteveUK on YouTube.

RetroSteveUK on Facebook.

RetroSteveUK on Twitter.

Games: Nostalgic U.K. Games And Toys Adverts – Volume 1

Image © of Suzy Hazelwood via Pexels

There are games and toys shown in the ads below that people have kept from their childhood I am sure or wish they could have again to add to their retro collection.  These adverts will bring back happy memories for many.

The following adverts are from the 1980’s and 1990’s but may have the odd 1970’s thrown in.

These adverts are more entertaining than a lot of the drivel that is put on TV these days.  Enjoy your trip down memory lane.

Categories

Blog Posts

Notes And Links

Suzy Hazelwood on Pexels – The image shown at the top of this page is the copyright of Suzy Hazelwood.  You can find more great work from the photographer Suzy and lots more free stock photo’s at Pixabay.

RetroSteveUK on YouTube.

RetroSteveUK on Facebook.

RetroSteveUK on Twitter.

Christmas: A Christmas Carol By Charles Dickens – Screen Versions

Image © of Liliboas via iStock

I LOVE A CHRISTMAS CAROL!

Obviously, the original book is the best version of any format because it is the original source material but as long as other versions stick close to that source then I will more than likely enjoy it.

Below are just some of the MANY film and TV versions out there for your viewing pleasure.  Enjoy.

Read more about A Christmas Carol here

1900’s

I haven’t watched this version but I have included it as it is a silent movie piece of history and the earliest screen version that was made.

Read more about Scrooge, or, Marley’s Ghost (1901), starring Daniel Smith, here.

1910’s

Another version I  haven’t watched but again I have included it as it is a silent movie piece of history.  This one was made in America by the Edison Film Company and is the second earliest screen version after Scrooge, or, Marley’s Ghost (1901)  

Read more about A Christmas Carol (1910), starring Marc McDermott, here.

1930’s

Another version I haven’t watched but I have included it as it is a very early screen version.

Read more about Scrooge (1935), starring Seymour Hicks, here.

1950’s

This is a great screen version.

Read more about Scrooge (1951), starring Alastair Sim, here.

1970’s

This is my all-time favourite screen version and always brings fond memories of my Mom as we watched this every year together.

Read more about Scrooge (1970, starring Albert Finney, here.

This is a good screen-animated version. 

Read more about A Christmas Carol (1971), starring Alastair Sim, here.

1980’s

This is a great screen version.

Read more about A Christmas Carol (1984), starring George C. Scott, here.

1990’s

This is a great screen version.

Read more about A Christmas Carol (1999), starring Patrick Stewart, here.

Blog Posts

Notes And Links

Liliboas on iStock.  The image shown at the top of this page of a Christmas tree and presents is the copyright of Liliboas.  You can find more great work from the photographer Lili and lots more free stock photos at iStock.

Charles Dickens Museum – Official website.  The museum is situated at 48 Doughty Street, Dickens’s London home from 1837-1839.  He moved there with his wife Catherine and their eldest son Charlie.   After the Dickenses left Doughty Street, the property was largely used as a boarding house until the Dickens Fellowship purchased it as their headquarters in 1923.  The house opened to the public in 1925 and houses a significant collection linked to Dickens and his works. 

Today the Charles Dickens Museum is set up as though Dickens himself had just left.  It appears as a fairly typical middle-class Victorian home, complete with furnishings, portraits and decorations which are known to have belonged to Dickens.  A visit to the museum allows you to step back into 1837 and to see a world which is at once both intimately familiar, yet astonishingly different.  A world in which one of the greatest writers in the English language, found his inspiration. 

Charles Dickens Museum official Facebook page.

Charles Dickens Museum official Twitter page.

Project Gutenberg – Project Gutenberg is an online library of free e-books and was the first provider of free electronic books.  Michael Hart, the founder of Project Gutenberg, invented e-books in 1971 and his memory continues to inspire the creation of them and related content today.

All videos are via YouTube and their copyright belongs to whoever. 

Books: A Christmas Carol By Charles Dickens

A Christmas Carol 1843 first edition front cover via Project Gutenberg

This original illustration by John Leech is from the 1843 edition and is in the public domain. 

If you really know me well then you will know that Charles Dickens is my favourite author and A Christmas Carol is my favourite book by him.  I LOVE IT.

I have film and TV versions on DVD.  I have books of it.  I have it via a e-book and audiobook too. I can’t get enough of it.  Obviously the original book is the best because it is the original source material but as long as other versions  sticks close to that source then I will more than likely enjoy it.

Dickens changed the face of Christmas and made it into what we know it is today.  He has inspired many writers, myself included.  If I could jump in a time machine I would go back to Victorian times on Christmas Day and shake his hand and say thank you Charles for everything you have done and MERRY CHRISTMAS!

Read this book online, and get more download options and a bibliographic record on Project Gutenberg by clicking here.

For screen versions click here.

Listen to Neil Gaiman, via Open Culture,  read A Christmas Carol just like Charles Dickens read it by clicking here.

Below is the 1939 radio play to listen to that features not one old star legend but two, the late greats Lionel Barrymore and Orson Wells. 

About A Christmas Carol

A Christmas Carol 1843 first edition front cover: This original illustration by John Leech is from the 1843 edition and is in the public domain. Image via Project Gutenberg

A Christmas Carol.  In Prose.  Being a Ghost Story of Christmas, commonly known as A Christmas Carol, is a novella by Charles Dickens, first published in London by Chapman & Hall in 1843 and illustrated by John Leech.  A Christmas Carol recounts the story of Ebenezer Scrooge, an elderly miser who is visited by the ghost of his former business partner Jacob Marley and the spirits of Christmas Past, Present and Yet to Come.  After their visits, Scrooge is transformed into a kinder, gentler man.

Dickens wrote A Christmas Carol during a period when the British were exploring and re-evaluating past Christmas traditions, including carols, and newer customs such as cards and Christmas trees.  He was influenced by the experiences of his own youth and by the Christmas stories of other authors, including Washington Irving and Douglas Jerrold.  Dickens had written three Christmas stories prior to the novella and was inspired following a visit to the Field Lane Ragged School, one of several establishments for London’s street children.  The treatment of the poor and the ability of a selfish man to redeem himself by transforming into a more sympathetic character are the key themes of the story.  There is discussion among academics as to whether this is a fully secular story, or if it is a Christian allegory.

Published on the 19th of December, the first edition sold out by Christmas Eve.  By the end of 1844 thirteen editions had been released.  Most critics reviewed the novella favourably.  The story was illicitly copied in January 1844 and Dickens took legal action against the publishers, who went bankrupt, further reducing Dickens’s small profits from the publication.  He went on to write four other Christmas stories in subsequent years.  In 1849 he began public readings of the story, which proved so successful he undertook 127 further performances until 1870, the year of his death.  A Christmas Carol has never been out of print and has been translated into several languages.  The story has been adapted many times for film, stage, opera and other media.

A Christmas Carol captured the zeitgeist of the mid-Victorian revival of the Christmas holiday.  Dickens had acknowledged the influence of the modern Western observance of Christmas and later inspired several aspects of Christmas, including family gatherings, seasonal food and drink, dancing, games and a festive generosity of spirit.

1843 first edition title page: This original illustration by John Leech is from the 1843 edition and is in the public domain. Image via Project Gutenberg
Charles Dickens (in 1842, the year before the publication of A Christmas Carol) by Francis Alexander. Image via Wikipedia
John Leech by unknown is in the public domain. Image via Wikipedia

Characters

The central character of A Christmas Carol is Ebenezer Scrooge, a miserly London-based businessman, described in the story as “a squeezing, wrenching, grasping, scraping, clutching, covetous old sinner!” Richard Michael Kelly, from Broadway Press noted that Scrooge may have been influenced by Dickens’s conflicting feelings for his father, whom he both loved and demonised.  This psychological conflict may be responsible for the two radically different Scrooges in the tale (one a cold, stingy and greedy semi-recluse, the other a benevolent, sociable man).  The professor of English literature Robert Douglas-Fairhurst considers that in the opening part of the book covering young Scrooge’s lonely and unhappy childhood, and his aspiration for money to avoid poverty “is something of a self-parody of Dickens’s fears about himself”.   The post-transformation parts of the book are how Dickens optimistically sees himself.

Scrooge could also be based on two misers.  One being the eccentric John Elwes, M.P. or Jemmy Wood, the owner of the Gloucester Old Bank and also known as The Gloucester Miser.  According to the sociologist Frank W. Elwell, Scrooge’s views on the poor are a reflection of those of the demographer and political economist Thomas Malthus, while the miser’s questions “Are there no prisons? … And the Union workhouses? … The treadmill and the Poor Law are in full vigour, then?” are a reflection of a sarcastic question raised by the philosopher Thomas Carlyle, “Are there not treadmills, gibbets; even hospitals, poor-rates, New Poor-Law?”

There are literary precursors for Scrooge in Dickens’s own works. Peter Ackroyd, Dickens’s biographer, sees similarities between the character and the elder Martin Chuzzlewit character, although the miser is “a more fantastic image” than the Chuzzlewit patriarch.  Ackroyd observes that Chuzzlewit’s transformation to a charitable figure is a parallel to that of the miser.  Douglas-Fairhurst sees that the minor character Gabriel Grub from The Pickwick Papers was also an influence when creating Scrooge.  It is possible that Scrooge’s name came from a tombstone Dickens had seen on a visit to Edinburgh.  The grave was for Ebenezer Lennox Scroggie, whose job was given as a meal man (a corn merchant).  Dickens misread the inscription as mean man.  This theory has been described as a probable Dickens hoax for which no one could find any corroborating evidence.

When Dickens was young he lived near a tradesman’s premises with the sign Goodge and Marney, which may have provided the name for Scrooge’s former business partner.  For the chained Marley, Dickens drew on his memory of a visit to the Western Penitentiary in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in March 1842, where he saw, and was affected by seeing fettered prisoners.  For the character Tiny Tim, Dickens used his nephew Henry, a disabled boy who was five at the time A Christmas Carol was written.  The two figures of Want and Ignorance, sheltering in the robes of the Ghost of Christmas Present, were inspired by the children Dickens had seen on his visit to a ragged school in the East End of London. 

John Elwes by John Meggot Elwes is in the public domain. Image via Wikipedia

Reception

The transformation of Scrooge is central to the story.  Writer Paul Davis considers Scrooge to be “a protean figure always in process of reformation”.  Michael Kelly writes that the transformation is reflected in the description of Scrooge, who begins as a two-dimensional character, but who then grows into one who “possesses an emotional depth and a regret for lost opportunities”.  Some writers, including Grace Moore, the Dickens scholar, consider that there is a Christian theme running through A Christmas Carol, and that the novella should be seen as an allegory of the Christian concept of redemption.  Dickens’s biographer, Claire Tomalin, sees the conversion of Scrooge as carrying the Christian message that “even the worst of sinners may repent and become a good man”.  Dickens’s attitudes towards organised religion were complex.  He based his beliefs and principles on the New Testament.  Dickens’s statement that Marley “had no bowels” is a reference to the bowels of compassion mentioned in the First Epistle of John, the reason for his eternal damnation.

Other writers, including Kelly, consider that Dickens put forward a “secular vision of this sacred holiday”.  The Dickens scholar John O. Jordan argues that A Christmas Carol shows what Dickens referred to in a letter to his friend John Forster as his “Carol philosophy, cheerful views, sharp anatomisation of humbug, jolly good temper … and a vein of glowing, hearty, generous, mirthful, beaming reference in everything to Home and Fireside”.  From a secular viewpoint, the cultural historian Penne Restad suggests that Scrooge’s redemption underscores “the conservative, individualistic and patriarchal aspects” of Dickens’s “Carol philosophy” of charity and altruism.

Dickens wrote A Christmas Carol in response to British social attitudes towards poverty, particularly child poverty, and wished to use the novella as a means to put forward his arguments against it.  The story shows Scrooge as a paradigm for self-interest, and the possible repercussions of ignoring the poor, especially children in poverty (personified by the allegorical figures of Want and Ignorance).  The two figures were created to arouse sympathy with readers, as was Tiny Tim.  Douglas-Fairhurst observes that the use of such figures allowed Dickens to present his message of the need for charity, without alienating his largely middle-class readership.

William Makepeace Thackeray by unknown is in the public domain. Image via Wikipedia

The Plot

The book is divided into five chapters, which Dickens titled staves.

SPOILER ALERT: Skip this bit if you haven’t read the book and are planning to do so!

Stave One

A Christmas Carol opens on a bleak, cold Christmas Eve in London, seven years after the death of Ebenezer Scrooge’s business partner, Jacob Marley.  Scrooge, an ageing miser, dislikes Christmas and refuses a dinner invitation from his nephew Fred (the son of Fan, Scrooge’s dead sister).  He turns away two men who seek a donation from him to provide food and heating for the poor and only grudgingly allows his overworked, underpaid clerk, Bob Cratchit, Christmas Day off with pay to conform to the social custom.

That night Scrooge is visited at home by Marley’s ghost, who wanders the Earth entwined by heavy chains and money boxes forged during a lifetime of greed and selfishness.  Marley tells Scrooge that he has a single chance to avoid the same fate and he will be visited by three spirits.  He must listen to them or be cursed to carry much heavier chains of his own.

Marley's Ghost: This original illustration is by John Leech is from the 1843 edition and is in the public domain. Image via Project Gutenberg
Wretched woman with an infant: This original illustration is by John Leech is from the 1843 edition and is in the public domain. Image via Project Gutenberg

Stave Two

The first spirit, the Ghost of Christmas Past, takes Scrooge to the Christmas scenes of Scrooge’s boyhood, reminding him of a time when he was more innocent.  The scenes reveal Scrooge’s lonely childhood at boarding school, his relationship with his beloved sister Fan, and a Christmas party hosted by his first employer, Mr Fezziwig, who treated him like a son.  Scrooge’s neglected fiancée Belle is shown ending their relationship, as she realises that he will never love her as much as he loves money.  Finally, they visit a now-married Belle with her large, happy family on the Christmas Eve that Marley died.  Scrooge, upset by hearing Belle’s description of the man that he has become, demands that the ghost remove him from the house.

Mr. Fezziwig’s Ball: This original illustration is by John Leech is from the 1843 edition and is in the public domain. Image via Project Gutenberg
The Ghost of Christmas Past gets extinguished by Scrooge: This original illustration is by John Leech is from the 1843 edition and is in the public domain. Image via Project Gutenberg

Stave Three

The second spirit, the Ghost of Christmas Present, takes Scrooge to a joyous market with people buying the makings of Christmas dinner.  The Ghost then takes Scrooge to Bob Cratchit’s family feast and introduces his youngest son, Tiny Tim, a happy boy who is seriously ill.  The spirit informs Scrooge that Tiny Tim will die unless the course of events changes.  Afterwards, the spirit and Scrooge travel to celebrations of Christmas in a miner’s cottage, in a lighthouse, and on a ship at sea.  Scrooge and the ghost then visit Fred’s Christmas party.  Before disappearing, the spirit shows Scrooge two hideous, emaciated children named Ignorance and Want.  He tells Scrooge to beware them and mocks Scrooge’s concern for their welfare.

Scrooge’s Third Visitor: This original illustration is by John Leech is from the 1843 edition and is in the public domain. Image via Project Gutenberg
Ignorance and Want: This original illustration is by John Leech is from the 1843 edition and is in the public domain. Image via Project Gutenberg

Stave Four

The third spirit, the Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come, shows Scrooge a Christmas Day in the future.  The silent ghost reveals scenes involving the death of a disliked man whose funeral is attended by local businessmen only on condition that lunch is provided.  His charwoman, laundress and the local undertaker steal his possessions to sell to a fence.  When he asks the spirit to show a single person who feels emotion over his death, he is only given the pleasure of a poor couple who rejoice that his death gives them more time to put their finances in order.  When Scrooge asks to see tenderness connected with any death, the ghost shows him Bob Cratchit and his family mourning the death of Tiny Tim.  The ghost then allows Scrooge to see a neglected grave, with a tombstone bearing Scrooge’s name.  Sobbing, Scrooge pledges to change his ways.

Stave Five

Scrooge awakens on Christmas morning a changed man.  He makes a large donation to the charity he rejected the previous day, anonymously sends a large turkey to the Cratchit home for Christmas dinner and spends the afternoon with Fred’s family.  The following day he gives Cratchit an increase in pay, and begins to become a father figure to Tiny Tim.  From then on Scrooge treats everyone with kindness, generosity and compassion, embodying the spirit of Christmas.

The Last of the Spirits: This original illustration is by John Leech is from the 1843 edition and is in the public domain. Image via Project Gutenberg
Scrooge and Bob Cratchit celebrate Christmas: This original illustration is by John Leech is from the 1843 edition and is in the public domain. Image via Project Gutenberg

Publication

As the result of the disagreements with Chapman and Hall over the commercial failures of Martin Chuzzlewit, Dickens arranged to pay for the publishing himself, in exchange for a percentage of the profits.  Production of A Christmas Carol was not without problems.  The first printing contained drab olive endpapers that Dickens felt were unacceptable, and the publisher Chapman and Hall quickly replaced them with yellow endpapers, but, once replaced, those clashed with the title page, which was then redone.  The final product was bound in red cloth with gilt-edged pages, completed only two days before the publication date of the 19th of December 1843.  Following publication, Dickens arranged for the manuscript to be bound in red Morocco leather and presented as a gift to his solicitor, Thomas Mitton.

Priced at five shillings (equal to £26 in 2022 pounds), the first run of 6,000 copies sold out by Christmas Eve.  Chapman and Hall issued second and third editions before the new year, and the book continued to sell well into 1844.  By the end of 1844 eleven more editions had been released.  Since its initial publication the book has been issued in numerous hardback and paperback editions, translated into several languages and has never been out of print.  It was Dickens’s most popular book in the United States, and sold over two million copies in the hundred years following its first publication there.

The high production costs upon which Dickens insisted led to reduced profits, and the first edition brought him only £230 (equal to £24,000 in 2022 pounds)  rather than the £1,000 (equal to £104,000 in 2022 pounds) he expected.  A year later, the profits were only £744, and Dickens was deeply disappointed.

Reception

According to Douglas-Fairhurst, contemporary reviews of A Christmas Carol “were almost uniformly kind”.  The Illustrated London News described how the story’s “impressive eloquence… its unfeigned lightness of heart… its playful and sparkling humour… its gentle spirit of humanity” all put the reader “in good humour with ourselves, with each other, with the season and with the author”.  The critic from The Athenaeum, the literary magazine, considered it a “tale to make the reader laugh and cry… to open his hands, and open his heart to charity even toward the uncharitable… a dainty dish to set before a King.”  William Makepeace Thackeray, writing in Fraser’s Magazine, described the book as “a national benefit and to every man or woman who reads it, a personal kindness.  The last two people I heard speak of it were women; neither knew the other, or the author, and both said, by way of criticism, ‘God bless him!'”

The poet Thomas Hood, in his own journal, wrote that “If Christmas, with its ancient and hospitable customs, its social and charitable observances, were ever in danger of decay, this is the book that would give them a new lease.”  The reviewer for Tait’s Edinburgh Magazine Theodore Martin, who was usually critical of Dickens’s work spoke well of A Christmas Carol, noting it was “a noble book, finely felt and calculated to work much social good”.  After Dickens’s death, Margaret Oliphant deplored the turkey and plum pudding aspects of the book but admitted that in the days of its first publication it was regarded as “a new gospel”, and noted that the book was unique in that it made people behave better.  The religious press generally ignored the tale but, in January 1884, Christian Remembrancer thought the tale’s old and hackneyed subject was treated in an original way and praised the author’s sense of humour and pathos.  The writer and social thinker John Ruskin told a friend that he thought Dickens had taken the religion from Christmas, and had imagined it as “mistletoe and pudding, neither resurrection from the dead, nor rising of new stars, nor teaching of wise men, nor shepherds”.

There were critics of the book. The New Monthly Magazine praised the story, but thought the book’s physical excesses, the gilt edges and expensive binding, kept the price high, making it unavailable to the poor.  The review recommended that the tale should be printed on cheap paper and priced accordingly.  An unnamed writer for The Westminster Review mocked Dickens’s grasp of economics, asking “Who went without turkey and punch in order that Bob Cratchit might get them for, unless there were turkeys and punch in surplus, someone must go without”.

Following criticism of the US in American Notes and Martin Chuzzlewit, American readers were less enthusiastic at first, but by the end of the American Civil War, copies of the book were in wide circulation.  In 1863 The New York Times published an enthusiastic review, noting that the author brought the “old Christmas… of bygone centuries and remote manor houses, into the living rooms of the poor of today”.

Aftermath

In January 1844 Parley’s Illuminated Library published an unauthorised version of the story in a condensed form which they sold for twopence.  Dickens wrote to his solicitor and said. “I have not the least doubt that if these Vagabonds can be stopped they must… Let us be the sledge-hammer in this, or I shall be beset by hundreds of the same crew when I come out with a long story.”

Two days after the release of the Parley version, Dickens sued on the basis of copyright infringement and won.  The publishers declared themselves bankrupt and Dickens was left to pay £700 in costs.  The small profits Dickens earned from A Christmas Carol further strained his relationship with his publishers, and he broke with them in favour of Bradbury and Evans, who had been printing his works to that point.

Dickens returned to the tale several times during his life to amend the phrasing and punctuation.  He capitalised on the success of the book by publishing other Christmas stories: The Chimes (1844), The Cricket on the Hearth (1845), The Battle of Life (1846) and The Haunted Man and the Ghost’s Bargain (1848).  These were secular conversion tales which acknowledged the progressive societal changes of the previous year, and highlighted those social problems which still needed to be addressed.  While the public eagerly bought the later books, the reviewers were highly critical of the stories.

Performances And Adaptations

By 1849 Dickens was engaged with David Copperfield and had neither the time nor the inclination to produce another Christmas book.  He decided the best way to reach his audience with his Carol philosophy was by public readings.  During Christmas 1853 Dickens gave a reading in Birmingham Town Hall to the Industrial and Literary Institute. The performance was a great success.  Thereafter, he read the tale in an abbreviated version 127 times, until 1870 (the year of his death), including at his farewell performance.

In the years following the book’s publication, responses to the tale were published by W. M. Swepstone (Christmas Shadows, 1850), Horatio Alger (Job Warner’s Christmas, 1863), Louisa May Alcott (A Christmas Dream, and How It Came True, 1882), and others who followed Scrooge’s life as a reformed man, or some who thought Dickens had got it wrong and needed to be corrected.

The novella was adapted for the stage almost immediately.  Three productions opened on the 5th of February 1844, one by Edward Stirling being sanctioned by Dickens and running for more than 40 nights.  By the close of February 1844 eight rival A Christmas Carol theatrical productions were playing in London.  The story has been adapted for film and television more than any of Dickens’s other works.  In 1901 it was produced as Scrooge, or, Marley’s Ghost, a silent black-and-white British film.  It was one of the first known adaptations of a Dickens work on film, but it is now largely lost.  The story was adapted in 1923 for BBC radio.  The story has been adapted to other media, including opera, ballet, animation, stage musicals and a BBC mime production starring Marcel Marceau.

Davis considers the adaptations have become better remembered than the original.  Some of Dickens’s scenes, such as visiting the miners and lighthouse keepers, have been forgotten by many, while other events often added, such as Scrooge visiting the Cratchits on Christmas Day are now thought by many to be part of the original story.  Accordingly, Davis distinguishes between the original text and the “remembered version”.

Read more here.

Charles Dickens’ hand-edited copy of A Christmas Carol. Image via Open Culture
Charles Dickens’ hand-edited copy of A Christmas Carol. Image via Open Culture

You can read more about Charles Dickens’ hand-edited copy of A Christmas Carol here.

Legacy

The phrase Merry Christmas had been around for many years. The earliest known written use was in a letter in 1534 but Dickens’s use of the phrase in A Christmas Carol popularised it among the Victorian public.  The exclamation Bah! Humbug! entered popular use in the English language as a retort to anything sentimental or overly festive. The name Scrooge became used as a designation for a miser and was added to the Oxford English Dictionary as such in 1982

In the early 19th century the celebration of Christmas was associated in Britain with the countryside and peasant revels, disconnected to the increasing urbanisation and industrialisation taking place.  Davis considers that in A Christmas Carol, Dickens showed that Christmas could be celebrated in towns and cities, despite increasing modernisation.  The modern observance of Christmas in English-speaking countries is largely the result of a mid-Victorian revival of the holiday.  The Oxford Movement of the 1830’s and 1840’s had produced a resurgence of the traditional rituals and religious observances associated with Christmastide and, with A Christmas Carol, Dickens captured the zeitgeist while he reflected and reinforced his vision of Christmas.

Dickens advocated a humanitarian focus of the holiday, which influenced several aspects of Christmas that are still celebrated in Western culture, such as family gatherings, seasonal food and drink, dancing, games and a festive generosity of spirit.  The historian Ronald Hutton writes that Dickens “linked worship and feasting, within a context of social reconciliation”.

The novelist William Dean Howells, analysing several of Dickens’s Christmas stories, including A Christmas Carol, considered that by 1891 the “pathos appears false and strained; the humor largely horseplay; the characters theatrical; the joviality pumped; the psychology commonplace; the sociology alone funny”.   The writer James Joyce considered that Dickens took a childish approach with A Christmas Carol, producing a gap between the naïve optimism of the story and the realities of life at the time.

Ruth Glancy, the professor of English literature, states that the largest impact of A Christmas Carol was the influence felt by individual readers.  In early 1844 The Gentleman’s Magazine attributed a rise of charitable giving in Britain to Dickens’s novella.  In 1874, Robert Louis Stevenson, after reading Dickens’s Christmas books, vowed to give generously to those in need, and Thomas Carlyle expressed a generous hospitality by hosting two Christmas dinners after reading the book.  In 1867 one American businessman was so moved by attending a reading that he closed his factory on Christmas Day and sent every employee a turkey, while in the early years of the 20th century Maud of Wales (the Queen of Norway) sent gifts to London’s crippled children signed “With Tiny Tim’s Love”.  On the novella, the author G. K. Chesterton wrote “The beauty and blessing of the story… lie in the great furnace of real happiness that glows through Scrooge and everything around him… Whether the Christmas visions would or would not convert Scrooge, they convert us.”

Analysing the changes made to adaptations over time, Davis sees changes to the focus of the story and its characters to reflect mainstream thinking of the period.  While Dickens’s Victorian audiences would have viewed the tale as a spiritual but secular parable, in the early 20th century it became a children’s story, read by parents who remembered their parents reading it when they were younger.  In the lead-up to and during the Great Depression, Davis suggests that while some saw the story as a “denunciation of capitalism…most read it as a way to escape oppressive economic realities”.  The film versions of the 1930’s were different in the UK and US.  British-made films showed a traditional telling of the story, while US-made works showed Cratchit in a more central role, escaping the depression caused by European bankers and celebrating what Davis calls “the Christmas of the common man”.  In the 1960’s, Scrooge was sometimes portrayed as a Freudian figure wrestling with his past.  By the 1980’s he was again set in a world of depression and economic uncertainty.

Read more here

Blog Posts

Notes And Links

The images above are in the Public Domain via Wikipedia and Project Gutenberg.

Charles Dickens Museum – Official website.  The museum is situated at 48 Doughty Street, Dickens’s London home from 1837-1839.  He moved there with his wife Catherine and their eldest son Charlie.   After the Dickenses left Doughty Street, the property was largely used as a boarding house until the Dickens Fellowship purchased it as their headquarters in 1923.  The house opened to the public in 1925 and houses a significant collection linked to Dickens and his works. 

Today the Charles Dickens Museum is set up as though Dickens himself had just left.  It appears as a fairly typical middle-class Victorian home, complete with furnishings, portraits and decorations which are known to have belonged to Dickens.  A visit to the museum allows you to step back into 1837 and to see a world which is at once both intimately familiar, yet astonishingly different.  A world in which one of the greatest writers in the English language, found his inspiration. 

Charles Dickens Museum official Facebook page.

Charles Dickens Museum official Twitter page.

Project Gutenberg – Official website.  Project Gutenberg is an online library of free e-books and was the first provider of free electronic books.  Michael Hart, the founder of Project Gutenberg, invented e-books in 1971 and his memory continues to inspire the creation of them and related content today.

Open Culture – Official website.  Open Culture scours the web for the best educational media.  They find the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons and educational videos you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.

Christmas: Nostalgic Christmas Adverts

Image © of Liliboas via iStock

The following adverts are from the 1980’s and 1990’s but may have the odd 1970’s thrown in!

These adverts are more entertaining than a lot of the drivel that is put on TV these days.  Enjoy your trip down memory lane.

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Blog Posts

Notes And Links