Peace: Buddhism – Part One

Image © Frank Parker

I don’t practice Buddhism but I have been interested in it for a long time now.  It is the only religion I have time for because it truly promotes peace without the need for an imaginary man in the sky and the fear and anything that is not peaceful associated with him.

About Buddhism

Buddhism, also known as Buddha Dharma or Dharmavinaya (translated means doctrines and disciplines), is an Indian religion or philosophical tradition based on a series of original teachings attributed to Gautama Buddha.  Originating in ancient India as a movement professing śramaṇa between the 6th and 4th centuries BCE, it gradually spread throughout much of Asia via the Silk Road.  Presently, it is the world’s fourth-largest religion, with over 520 million followers (Buddhists) who comprise seven percent of the global population.  Buddhism encompasses a variety of traditions, beliefs, and spiritual practices that are largely based on the Buddha’s teachings and their resulting interpreted philosophies.

As expressed in the Four Noble Truths of the Buddha, the goal of Buddhism is to overcome the suffering (duḥkha) caused by desire (taṇhā) and ignorance (avidyā) of reality’s true nature, including impermanence (anitya) and non-self (anātman).  Most Buddhist traditions emphasize transcending the individual self through the attainment of nirvāṇa (translated means quenching) or by following the path of Buddhahood, ending the cycle of death and rebirth (saṃsāra).  Buddhist schools vary in their interpretation of the paths to liberation (mārga) as well as the relative importance and canonicity assigned to various Buddhist texts, and their specific teachings and practices.  Widely observed practices include meditation; observance of moral precepts; monasticism; taking refuge in the Buddha, the dharma, and the saṅgha; and the cultivation of perfections (pāramitā).

Two major extant branches of Buddhism are generally recognized by scholars: Theravāda (translated means School of the Elders) and Mahāyāna (translated means Great Vehicle).  The Theravāda branch has a widespread following in Sri Lanka as well as in Southeast Asia (namely Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, and Cambodia).  The Mahāyāna branch (which includes the traditions of Zen, Pure Land, Nichiren, Tiantai, Tendai, and Shingon) is predominantly practiced in Nepal, Bhutan, China, Malaysia, Vietnam, Taiwan, Korea, and Japan.  Additionally, Vajrayāna (translated means Indestructible Vehicle), a body of teachings attributed to Indian adepts, may be viewed as a separate branch or an aspect of the Mahāyāna tradition.  Tibetan Buddhism, which preserves the Vajrayāna teachings of eighth-century India, is practised in the Himalayan states as well as in Mongolia and Russian Kalmykia.  Historically, until the early 2nd millennium, Buddhism was widely practised in the Indian subcontinent; it also had a foothold to some extent in other places such as Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, and the Philippines.

For a more detailed timeline of Buddhism click here.

Image © of Shazz via Wikipedia

Dharma Wheel 

The Dharmachakra is a sacred symbol which represents Buddhism and its traditions.

Image © of Mithila Wijekoon via Wikipedia

Vesak Decorations In Sri Lanka

These lanterns are used in the Vesak Festival, which celebrates the birth, enlightenment and Parinirvana of Gautama Buddha.

The History Of Buddhism

Historical Roots

Historically, the roots of Buddhism lie in the religious thought of Iron Age India around the middle of the first millennium BCE This was a period of great intellectual ferment and socio-cultural change known as the Second urbanisation, marked by the growth of towns and trade, the composition of the Upanishads and the historical emergence of the Śramaṇa traditions.

New ideas developed both in the Vedic tradition in the form of the Upanishads and outside of the Vedic tradition through the Śramaṇa movements.  The term Śramaṇa refers to several Indian religious movements parallel to but separate from the historical Vedic religion, including Buddhism, Jainism and others such as Ājīvika.

Several Śramaṇa movements are known to have existed in India before the 6th century BCE (pre-Buddha, pre-Mahavira), and these influenced both the āstika and nāstika traditions of Indian philosophy.  According to Martin Wilshire, the Śramaṇa tradition evolved in India over two phases, namely Paccekabuddha and Savaka phases, the former being the tradition of individual ascetics and the latter of disciples, and that Buddhism and Jainism ultimately emerged from these.  Brahmanical and non-Brahmanical ascetic groups shared and used several similar ideas but the Śramaṇa traditions also drew upon already established Brahmanical concepts and philosophical roots, states Wiltshire, to formulate their own doctrines.  Brahmanical motifs can be found in the oldest Buddhist texts, using them to introduce and explain Buddhist ideas.  For example, prior to Buddhist developments, the Brahmanical tradition internalised and variously reinterpreted the three Vedic sacrificial fires as concepts such as Truth, Rite, Tranquility or Restraint.  Buddhist texts also refer to the three Vedic sacrificial fires, reinterpreting and explaining them as ethical conduct.

The Śramaṇa religions challenged and broke with the Brahmanic tradition on core assumptions such as Atman (soul, self), Brahman, and the nature of the afterlife, and they rejected the authority of the Vedas and Upanishads.  Buddhism was one among several Indian religions that did so.

Read more about The History Of Buddhism here.

Image © of Daderot via Wikipedia

Mahākāśyapa

Mahākāśyapa meets an Ājīvika ascetic, one of the common Śramaṇa groups in ancient India.

Indian Buddhism

The history of Indian Buddhism may be divided into five periods: Early Buddhism (occasionally called pre-sectarian Buddhism), Nikaya Buddhism or Sectarian Buddhism: The period of the early Buddhist schools, Early Mahayana Buddhism, Late Mahayana, and the era of Vajrayana or the Tantric Age.

Read more about Indian Buddhism here.

Pre-Sectarian Buddhism

According to Lambert Schmithausen Pre-sectarian Buddhism is “the canonical period prior to the development of different schools with their different positions.”

The early Buddhist Texts include the four principal Pali Nikāyas (and their parallel Agamas found in the Chinese canon) together with the main body of monastic rules, which survive in the various versions of the patimokkha.  However, these texts were revised over time, and it is unclear what constitutes the earliest layer of Buddhist teachings.  One method to obtain information on the oldest core of Buddhism is to compare the oldest extant versions of the Theravadin Pāli Canon and other texts.  The reliability of the early sources, and the possibility to draw out a core of the oldest teachings, is a matter of dispute.  According to Vetter, inconsistencies remain, and other methods must be applied to resolve those inconsistencies.

According to Schmithausen, three positions held by scholars of Buddhism can be distinguished:

“Stress on the fundamental homogeneity and substantial authenticity of at least a considerable part of the Nikayic materials;”

“Scepticism with regard to the possibility of retrieving the doctrine of earliest Buddhism;”

“Cautious optimism in this respect.”

Read more about Pre-Sectarian Buddhism here.

Image © of Unknown via Wikipedia

Ajanta Caves, Cave 10

Cave 10, is a first-period type chaitya worship hall with a stupa but no idols.

The Core Teachings

According to Mitchell, certain basic teachings appear in many places throughout the early texts, which has led most scholars to conclude that Gautama Buddha must have taught something similar to the Four Noble Truths, the Noble Eightfold Path, Nirvana, the three marks of existence, the five aggregates, dependent origination, karma and rebirth.

According to N. Ross Reat, all of these doctrines are shared by the Theravada Pali texts and the Mahasamghika school’s Śālistamba Sūtra.  A recent study by Bhikkhu Analayo concludes that the Theravada Majjhima Nikaya and Sarvastivada Madhyama Agama contain mostly the same major doctrines.  Richard Salomon, in his study of the Gandharan texts (which are the earliest manuscripts containing early discourses), has confirmed that their teachings are “consistent with non-Mahayana Buddhism, which survives today in the Theravada school of Sri Lanka and Southeast Asia, but which in ancient times was represented by eighteen separate schools.”

However, some scholars argue that critical analysis reveals discrepancies among the various doctrines found in these early texts, which point to alternative possibilities for early Buddhism.  The authenticity of certain teachings and doctrines has been questioned.  For example, some scholars think that karma was not central to the teaching of the historical Buddha, while others disagree with this position.  Likewise, there is scholarly disagreement on whether insight was seen as liberating in early Buddhism or whether it was a later addition to the practice of the four jhānas.  Scholars such as Bronkhorst also think that the four noble truths may not have been formulated in earliest Buddhism, and did not serve in earliest Buddhism as a description of liberating insight.  According to Vetter, the description of the Buddhist path may initially have been as simple as the term the middle way”.  In time, this short description was elaborated, resulting in the description of the eightfold path.

Ashokan Era And The Early Schools

According to numerous Buddhist scriptures, soon after the parinirvāṇa (from Sanskrit: highest extinguishment) of Gautama Buddha, the first Buddhist council was held to collectively recite the teachings to ensure that no errors occurred in oral transmission.  Many modern scholars question the historicity of this event.  However, Richard Gombrich states that the monastic assembly recitations of the Buddha’s teaching likely began during Buddha’s lifetime, and they served a similar role in codifying the teachings.

The so-called Second Buddhist council resulted in the first schism in the Sangha.  Modern scholars believe that this was probably caused when a group of reformists called Sthaviras (elders) sought to modify the Vinaya (monastic rule), and this caused a split with the conservatives who rejected this change, they were called Mahāsāṃghikas.  While most scholars accept that this happened at some point, there is no agreement on the dating, especially if it dates to before or after the reign of Ashoka.

Buddhism may have spread only slowly throughout India until the time of the Mauryan emperor Ashoka (304 – 232 BCE), who was a public supporter of the religion.  The support of Aśoka and his descendants led to the construction of more stūpas (such as at Sanchi and Bharhut), temples (such as the Mahabodhi Temple) and to its spread throughout the Maurya Empire and into neighbouring lands such as Central Asia and the island of Sri Lanka.

During and after the Mauryan period (322 – 180 BCE), the Sthavira community gave rise to several schools, one of which was the Thera vada school which tended to congregate in the south and another which was the Sarvāstivāda school, which was mainly in north India.  Likewise, the Mahāsāṃghika groups also eventually split into different Sanghas.  Originally, these schisms were caused by disputes over monastic disciplinary codes of various fraternities, but eventually, by about 100 CE if not earlier, schisms were being caused by doctrinal disagreements too.

Following (or leading up to) the schisms, each Saṅgha started to accumulate their own version of Tripiṭaka (triple basket of texts).  In their Tripiṭaka, each school included the Suttas of the Buddha, and a Vinaya basket (disciplinary code) and some schools also added an Abhidharma basket which was text on detailed scholastic classification, summary and interpretation of the Suttas.  The doctrine details in the Abhidharma of various Buddhist schools differ significantly, and these were composed starting about the third century BCE and through the 1st millennium CE.

Read more about Ashokan Era And The Early Schools here, here and here.

Image © of Suyash Dwivedi via Wikipedia

Sanchi Stupa Number 3

This Stupa is near Vidisha, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Image © of Javierfv1212 via Wikipedia

Buddhist Missions

Map of the Buddhist missions during the reign of Ashoka according to the Edicts of Ashoka.  Sourced fromː Cousins, LS. “On the Vibhajjavadins.  The Mahimsasaka, Dhammaguttaka, Kassapiya and Tambapanniya branches of the ancient Theriyas”, Buddhist Studies Review 18, 2 (2001), TABLE E.

Post-Ashokan Expansion

According to the edicts of Aśoka, the Mauryan emperor sent emissaries to various countries west of India to spread Dharma, particularly in eastern provinces of the neighbouring Seleucid Empire, and even farther to Hellenistic kingdoms of the Mediterranean.  It is a matter of disagreement among scholars whether or not these emissaries were accompanied by Buddhist missionaries.

In central and west Asia, Buddhist influence grew, through Greek-speaking Buddhist monarchs and ancient Asian trade routes, a phenomenon known as Greco-Buddhism.  An example of this is evidenced in Chinese and Pali Buddhist records, such as Milindapanha and the Greco-Buddhist art of Gandhāra.  The Milindapanha describes a conversation between a Buddhist monk and the 2nd-century BCE Greek king Menander, after which Menander abdicates and goes into monastic life in the pursuit of nirvana.  Some scholars have questioned the Milindapanha version, expressing doubts about whether Menander was Buddhist or just favourably disposed to Buddhist monks.

The Kushan empire (30 – 375 CE) came to control the Silk Road trade through Central and South Asia, which brought them to interact with Gandharan Buddhism and the Buddhist institutions of these regions.  The Kushans patronised Buddhism throughout their lands, and many Buddhist centres were built or renovated (the Sarvastivada school was particularly favoured), especially by Emperor Kanishka (128 – 151 CE).  Kushan support helped Buddhism to expand into a world religion through their trade routes.  Buddhism spread to Khotan, the Tarim Basin, and China, and eventually to other parts of the far east.  Some of the earliest written documents of the Buddhist faith are the Gandharan Buddhist texts, dating from about the 1st century CE, and connected to the Dharmaguptaka school.

The Islamic conquest of the Iranian Plateau in the 7th century, followed by the Muslim conquests of Afghanistan and the later establishment of the Ghaznavid kingdom with Islam as the state religion in Central Asia between the 10th- and 12th century led to the decline and disappearance of Buddhism from most of these regions.

Read more about Post-Ashokan Expansion here.

Image © of World Imaging via Wikipedia

The Extent Of Buddhism And Trade

This map shows the extent of Buddhism and trade routes in the 1st century CE.

Image © of Gunawan Kartapranata via Wikipedia

The Buddhist Expansion Throughout Asia

A map showing the expansion of Buddhism, originated from India in VI century BCE to the rest of Asia until the present.

Mahāyāna Buddhism

The origins of Mahāyāna (Great Vehicle) Buddhism are not well understood and there are various competing theories about how and where this movement arose.  Theories include the idea that it began as various groups venerating certain texts or that it arose as a strict forest ascetic movement.

The first Mahāyāna works were written sometime between the 1st century BCE and the 2nd century CE.  Much of the early extant evidence for the origins of Mahāyāna comes from early Chinese translations of Mahāyāna texts, mainly those of Lokakṣema. (2nd century CE).  Some scholars have traditionally considered the earliest Mahāyāna sūtras to include the first versions of the Prajnaparamita series, along with texts concerning Akṣobhya, which were probably composed in the 1st century BCE in the south of India.

There is no evidence that Mahāyāna ever referred to a separate formal school or sect of Buddhism, with a separate monastic code (Vinaya), but rather that it existed as a certain set of ideals, and later doctrines, for bodhisattvas.  Records written by Chinese monks visiting India indicate that both Mahāyāna and non-Mahāyāna monks could be found in the same monasteries, with the difference that Mahāyāna monks worshipped figures of Bodhisattvas, while non-Mahayana monks did not.

Mahāyāna initially seems to have remained a small minority movement that was in tension with other Buddhist groups, struggling for wider acceptance.  However, during the fifth and sixth centuries CE, there seems to have been a rapid growth of Mahāyāna Buddhism, which is shown by a large increase in epigraphic and manuscript evidence in this period.  However, it still remained a minority in comparison to other Buddhist schools.

Mahāyāna Buddhist institutions continued to grow in influence during the following centuries, with large monastic university complexes such as Nalanda (established by the 5th-century CE Gupta emperor, Kumaragupta I) and Vikramashila (established under Dharmapala c. 783 to 820) becoming quite powerful and influential.  During this period of Late Mahāyāna, four major types of thought developed: Mādhyamaka, Yogācāra, Buddha-nature (Tathāgatagarbha), and the epistemological tradition of Dignaga and Dharmakirti.  According to Dan Lusthaus, Mādhyamaka and Yogācāra have a great deal in common, and the commonality stems from early Buddhism.

Read more about Mahāyāna Buddhism here.

Image © of Unknown via Wikipedia

A Buddhist Triad 

A Buddhist triad depicting (from left to right) a Kushan devotee, the Bodhisattva Maitreya, the Buddha, the Bodhisattva Avalokitesvara, and a Buddhist monk.  Circa second–third-century from Guimet Museum, Paris, France.

Late Indian Buddhism And Tantra

During the Gupta period (4th – 6th centuries) and the empire of Harṣavardana (c. 590 – 647 CE), Buddhism continued to be influential in India, and large Buddhist learning institutions such as Nalanda and Valabahi Universities were at their peak.  Buddhism also flourished under the support of the Pāla Empire (8th -12th centuries).  Under the Guptas and Palas, Tantric Buddhism or Vajrayana developed and rose to prominence.  It promoted new practices such as the use of mantras, dharanis, mudras, mandalas and the visualization of deities and Buddhas and developed a new class of literature, the Buddhist Tantras.  This new esoteric form of Buddhism can be traced back to groups of wandering yogi magicians called mahasiddhas.

The question of the origins of early Vajrayana has been taken up by various scholars.  David Seyfort Ruegg has suggested that Buddhist tantra employed various elements of a pan-Indian religious substrate which is not specifically Buddhist, Shaiva or Vaishnava.

According to Indologist Alexis Sanderson, various classes of Vajrayana literature developed as a result of royal courts sponsoring both Buddhism and Saivism.  Sanderson has argued that Buddhist tantras can be shown to have borrowed practices, terms, rituals and more from Shaiva tantras.  He argues that Buddhist texts even directly copied various Shaiva tantras, especially the Bhairava Vidyapitha tantras.  Ronald M. Davidson meanwhile, argues that Sanderson’s claims for direct influence from Shaiva Vidyapitha texts are problematic because “the chronology of the Vidyapitha tantras is by no means so well established” and that the Shaiva tradition also appropriated non-Hindu deities, texts and traditions.  Thus while “there can be no question that the Buddhist tantras were heavily influenced by Kapalika and other Saiva movements” argues Davidson, “the influence was apparently mutual.”

Already during this later era, Buddhism was losing state support in other regions of India, including the lands of the Karkotas, the Pratiharas, the Rashtrakutas, the Pandyas and the Pallavas.  This loss of support in favour of Hindu faiths like Vaishnavism and Shaivism is the beginning of the long and complex period of the Decline of Buddhism in the Indian subcontinent.  The Islamic invasions and conquest of India (10th to 12th century), further damaged and destroyed many Buddhist institutions, leading to its eventual near disappearance from India by the 1200’s.

Read more about Late Indian Buddhism And Tantra here.

Image © of myself via Wikipedia

Nalanda University

This is the site of Nalanda University, a great centre of Mahāyāna thought.

Image © of Unknown via Wikipedia

Vajrabhairava

This is a thangka (a Tibetan Buddhist painting on cotton, silk appliqué, usually depicting a Buddhist) showing Vajrabhairava, circa 1740.  Vajrayana adopted deities such as Bhairava, known as Yamantaka in Tibetan Buddhism.

Spread To East And Southeast Asia

The Silk Road transmission of Buddhism to China is most commonly thought to have started in the late 2nd or the 1st century CE, though the literary sources are all open to question.  The first documented translation efforts by foreign Buddhist monks in China were in the 2nd century CE, probably as a consequence of the expansion of the Kushan Empire into the Chinese territory of the Tarim Basin.

The first documented Buddhist texts translated into Chinese are those of the Parthian An Shigao (148 – 180 CE).  The first known Mahāyāna scriptural texts are translations into Chinese by the Kushan monk Lokakṣema in Luoyang, between 178 and 189 CE.  From China, Buddhism was introduced to its neighbours Korea (4th century), Japan (6th – 7th centuries), and Vietnam (c. 1st – 2nd centuries).

During the Chinese Tang dynasty (618 – 907), Chinese Esoteric Buddhism was introduced from India and Chan Buddhism (Zen) became a major religion.  Chan continued to grow in the Song dynasty (960 – 1279) and it was during this era that it strongly influenced Korean Buddhism and Japanese Buddhism.  Pure Land Buddhism also became popular during this period and was often practised together with Chan.  It was also during the Song that the entire Chinese canon was printed using over 130,000 wooden printing blocks.

During the Indian period of Esoteric Buddhism (from the 8th century onwards), Buddhism spread from India to Tibet and Mongolia.  Johannes Bronkhorst states that the esoteric form was attractive because it allowed both a secluded monastic community as well as the social rites and rituals important to laypersons and to kings for the maintenance of a political state during succession and wars to resist invasion.  During the Middle Ages, Buddhism slowly declined in India, while it vanished from Persia and Central Asia as Islam became the state religion.

The Theravada school arrived in Sri Lanka sometime in the 3rd century BCE. Sri Lanka became a base for its later spread to Southeast Asia after the 5th century CE (Myanmar, Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Cambodia and coastal Vietnam).  Theravada Buddhism was the dominant religion in Burma during the Mon Hanthawaddy Kingdom (1287 – 1552).  It also became dominant in the Khmer Empire during the 13th and 14th centuries and in the Thai Sukhothai Kingdom during the reign of Ram Khamhaeng (1237/1247 – 1298).

Image © of Dmitry A. Mottl via Wikipedia

The Angkor Thom

The Angkor Thom was built in Cambodia by Khmer King Jayavarman VII (circa 1120 – 1218).

Shakyamuni Buddha

Details of Shakyamuni Buddha’s life are mentioned in many Early Buddhist Texts but are inconsistent.  His social background and life details are difficult to prove, and the precise dates are uncertain.

Early texts have the Buddha’s family name as Gautama (Pali: Gotama), while some texts give Siddhartha as his surname.  He was born in Lumbini, present-day Nepal and grew up in Kapilavastu, a town in the Ganges Plain, near the modern Nepal–India border, and he spent his life in what is now modern Bihar and Uttar Pradesh.  Some hagiographic legends state that his father was a king named Suddhodana, and his mother was Queen Maya.  Scholars such as Richard Gombrich consider this a dubious claim because a combination of evidence suggests he was born in the Shakya community, which was governed by a small oligarchy or republic-like council where there were no ranks but where seniority mattered instead.  Some of the stories about Buddha, his life, his teachings, and claims about the society he grew up in may have been invented and interpolated at a later time into the Buddhist texts

According to early texts such as the Pali Ariyapariyesanā-sutta (The discourse on the noble quest) and its Chinese parallel from the Buddhist text Madhyama Āgama, Gautama was moved by the suffering (dukkha) of life and death, and its endless repetition due to rebirth.  He thus set out on a quest to find liberation from suffering (also known as nirvana).  Early texts and biographies state that Gautama first studied under two teachers of meditation, namely Āḷāra Kālāma (Sanskrit: Arada Kalama) and Uddaka Ramaputta (Sanskrit: Udraka Ramaputra), learning meditation and philosophy, particularly the meditative attainment of the sphere of nothingness from the former, and the sphere of neither perception nor non-perception from the latter.

Finding these teachings to be insufficient to attain his goal, he turned to the practice of severe asceticism, which included a strict fasting regime and various forms of breath control.  This too fell short of attaining his goal, and then he turned to the meditative practice of dhyana.  He famously sat in meditation under a Ficus religiosa tree ( now called the Bodhi Tree) in the town of Bodh Gaya and attained Awakening (Bodhi).

According to various early texts like the Mahāsaccaka-sutta, and the Samaññaphala Sutta, on awakening, the Buddha gained insight into the workings of karma and his former lives, as well as achieving the ending of the mental defilements (asavas), the ending of suffering, and the end of rebirth in saṃsāra.  This event also brought certainty about the Middle Way as the right path of spiritual practice to end suffering.  As a fully enlightened Buddha, he attracted followers and founded a Sangha (monastic order).  He spent the rest of his life teaching the Dharma he had discovered, and then died, achieving final nirvana, at the age of 80 in Kushinagar, India.

Buddha’s teachings were propagated by his followers, which in the last centuries of the 1st millennium BCE became various Buddhist schools of thought, each with its own basket of texts containing different interpretations and authentic teachings of the Buddha; these over time evolved into many traditions of which the more well known and widespread in the modern era are Theravada, Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism.

Image © of Avantiputra7 via Wikipedia

Mahajanapadas And Janapadas (Circa 500 BCE)

This map shows ancient kingdoms and cities of India during the time of the Buddha (circa 500 BCE) which is now modern-day India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan.

Emaciated Buddha Statue

Image © of Chainwit via Wikipedia

This statue in an Ubosoth in Bangkok and represents the stage of his asceticism.

Worldview

The term Buddhism is an occidental neologism, commonly (and rather roughly according to Donald S. Lopez Jr.) used as a translation for the Dharma of the Buddha, fójiào in Chinese, bukkyō in Japanese, nang pa sangs rgyas pa’i chos in Tibetan, buddhadharma in Sanskrit, buddhaśāsana in Pali.

Read more here.

The Four Noble Truths – Dukkha And Its Ending

The Four Truths express the basic orientation of Buddhism: we crave and cling to impermanent states and things, which is dukkha (translated as incapable of satisfying and painful).  This keeps us caught in saṃsāra, the endless cycle of repeated rebirth, dukkha and dying again.  But there is a way to liberation from this endless cycle to the state of nirvana, namely following the Noble Eightfold Path.

The truth of dukkha is the basic insight that life in this mundane world, with its clinging and craving to impermanent states and things, is dukkha, and unsatisfactory.  We expect happiness from states and things which are impermanent, and therefore cannot attain real happiness.

In Buddhism, dukkha is one of the three marks of existence, along with impermanence and anattā (non-self).  Buddhism, like other major Indian religions, asserts that everything is impermanent (anicca), but, unlike them, also asserts that there is no permanent self or soul in living beings (anattā).  The ignorance or misperception (avijjā) that anything is permanent or that there is self in any being is considered a wrong understanding, and the primary source of clinging and dukkha.

Dukkha arises when we crave (Pali: taṇhā) and cling to these changing phenomena.  The clinging and craving produce karma, which ties us to samsara, the cycle of death and rebirth.  Craving includes kama-tanha, craving for sense-pleasures; bhava-tanha, craving to continue the cycle of life and death, including rebirth; and vibhava-tanha, craving to not experience the world and painful feelings.

Dukkha ceases or can be confined when craving and clinging cease or are confined.  This also means that no more karma is being produced, and rebirth ends.  Cessation is nirvana, blowing out, and peace of mind.

By following the Buddhist path to moksha, liberation, one starts to disengage from craving and clinging to impermanent states and things.  The term path is usually taken to mean the Noble Eightfold Path, but other versions of the path can also be found in the Nikayas.  The Theravada tradition regards insight into the four truths as liberating in itself.

Read more about Dukkah here.

Read more about The Four Noble Truths here.

Image © of Daderot via Wikipedia

Enlightenment Of Buddha

This exhibit is in the Freer Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, USA, and is Kushan dynasty, late 2nd to early 3rd century CE, Gandhara.

Image © Unknown via Wikipedia

The Four Noble Truths

This is the Buddha teaching the Four Noble Truths.  The image is from a Sanskrit manuscript in Nalanda, Bihar, India.

The Cycle Of Rebirth

Saṃsāra

Saṃsāra means wandering or world, with the connotation of cyclic, circuitous change.  It refers to the theory of rebirth and cyclicality of all life, matter, and existence, a fundamental assumption of Buddhism, as with all major Indian religions.  Samsara in Buddhism is considered to be dukkha, unsatisfactory and painful, perpetuated by desire and avidya (ignorance), and the resulting karma. Liberation from this cycle of existence, nirvana, has been the foundation and the most important historical justification of Buddhism.

Buddhist texts assert that rebirth can occur in six realms of existence, namely three good realms (heavenly, demi-god, human) and three evil realms (animal, hungry ghosts, hellish).  Samsara ends if a person attains nirvana, the blowing out of the afflictions through insight into impermanence and non-self.

Image © Unknown via Wikipedia

The Wheel Of Life

This traditional Tibetan Buddhist Thangka depicts The Wheel Of Life with its six realms.

Rebirth

Rebirth refers to a process whereby beings go through a succession of lifetimes as one of many possible forms of sentient life, each running from conception to death.  In Buddhist thought, this rebirth does not involve a soul or any fixed substance.  This is because the Buddhist doctrine of anattā (Sanskrit: anātman, no-self doctrine) rejects the concepts of a permanent self or an unchanging, eternal soul found in other religions.

The Buddhist traditions have traditionally disagreed on what it is in a person that is reborn, as well as how quickly the rebirth occurs after death.  Some Buddhist traditions assert that the no self doctrine means that there is no enduring self, but there is avacya (inexpressible) personality (pudgala) which migrates from one life to another.

The majority of Buddhist traditions, in contrast, assert that vijñāna (a person’s consciousness) though evolving, exists as a continuum and is the mechanistic basis of what undergoes the rebirth process.  The quality of one’s rebirth depends on the merit or demerit gained by one’s karma (i.e. actions), as well as that accrued on one’s behalf by a family member.  Buddhism also developed a complex cosmology to explain the various realms or planes of rebirth.

Each individual rebirth takes place within one of five realms according to Theravadins, or six according to other schools (heavenly, demi-gods, humans, animals, hungry ghosts and hellish).

In East Asian and Tibetan Buddhism, rebirth is not instantaneous, and there is an intermediate state (Tibetan bardo) between one life and the next.  The orthodox Theravada position rejects the intermediate state and asserts that the rebirth of a being is immediate.  However there are passages in the Samyutta Nikaya of the Pali Canon that seem to lend support to the idea that the Buddha taught about an intermediate stage between one life and the next.

Read more here.

Image © of myself via Wikipedia

Ramabhar Stupa

The Ramabhar Stupa is in Kushinagar, Uttar Pradesh, India, and is regionally believed to be Buddha’s cremation site containing the Buddha’s ashes, placed by the ancient Malla people (the Malla tribe).

Karma

In Buddhism, karma (from Sanskrit: action, work) drives saṃsāra (the endless cycle of suffering and rebirth for each being). Good, skilful deeds (Pāli: kusala) and bad, unskilful deeds (Pāli: akusala) produce seeds in the unconscious receptacle (ālaya) that mature later either in this life or in a subsequent rebirth.  The existence of karma is a core belief in Buddhism, as with all major Indian religions, and it implies neither fatalism nor that everything that happens to a person is caused by karma.

A central aspect of the Buddhist theory of karma is that intent (cetanā) matters and is essential to bring about a consequence or phala (fruit) or vipāka (result).  However, good or bad karma accumulates even if there is no physical action, and just having ill or good thoughts creates karmic seeds; thus, actions of body, speech or mind all lead to karmic seeds.  In the Buddhist traditions, life aspects affected by the law of karma in past and current births of a being include the form of rebirth, the realm of rebirth, social class, character and major circumstances of a lifetime.  It operates like the laws of physics, without external intervention, on every being in all six realms of existence including human beings and gods.

A notable aspect of the karma theory in Buddhism is merit transfer.  A person accumulates merit not only through intentions and ethical living but also is able to gain merit from others by exchanging goods and services, such as through dāna (charity to monks or nuns).  Further, a person can transfer one’s own good karma to living family members and ancestors.

Read more here.

Liberation

The cessation of the kleshas and the attainment of nirvana (nibbāna), with which the cycle of rebirth ends, has been the primary and the soteriological goal of the Buddhist path for monastic life since the time of the Buddha.  The term path is usually taken to mean the Noble Eightfold Path, but other versions of the path can also be found in the Nikayas.  In some passages in the Pali Canon, a distinction is being made between right knowledge or insight (sammā-ñāṇa), and right liberation or release (sammā-vimutti), as the means to attain cessation and liberation.

Nirvana literally means blowing out, quenching, and becoming extinguished.  In early Buddhist texts, it is the state of restraint and self-control that leads to the blowing out and the ending of the cycles of sufferings associated with rebirths and redeaths.  Many later Buddhist texts describe nirvana as identical to anatta with complete emptiness and nothingness.  

The nirvana state has been described in Buddhist texts partly in a manner similar to other Indian religions, as the state of complete liberation, enlightenment, highest happiness, bliss, fearlessness, freedom, permanence, non-dependent origination, unfathomable, and indescribable.  It has also been described in part differently, as a state of spiritual release marked by emptiness and realisation of non-self.

While Buddhism considers the liberation from saṃsāra as the ultimate spiritual goal, in traditional practice, the primary focus of a vast majority of lay Buddhists has been to seek and accumulate merit through good deeds, donations to monks and various Buddhist rituals in order to gain better rebirths rather than nirvana.

Read more here and here.

Image © of Photo Dharma via Wikipedia

Buddha’s Spiritual Liberation

An aniconic depiction of the Buddha’s spiritual liberation (moksha) or awakening (bodhi), at Sanchi.  It shows Mucilinda with his Wives around the Buddha who is not depicted, only symbolized by the Bodhi tree and the empty seat.  

Dependent Arising

Pratityasamutpada, also called dependent arising, or dependent origination is the Buddhist theory to explain the nature and relations of being, becoming, existence and ultimate reality. Buddhism asserts that there is nothing independent, except the state of nirvana.  All physical and mental states depend on and arise from other pre-existing states, and in turn from them arise other dependent states while they cease.

The dependent arisings have a causal conditioning, and thus Pratityasamutpada is the Buddhist belief that causality is the basis of ontology, not a creator God nor the ontological Vedic concept called universal Self (Brahman) nor any other transcendent creative principle.  However, Buddhist thought does not understand causality in terms of Newtonian mechanics; rather it understands it as conditioned arising.  In Buddhism, dependent arising refers to conditions created by a plurality of causes that necessarily co-originate a phenomenon within and across lifetimes, such as karma in one life creating conditions that lead to rebirth in one of the realms of existence for another lifetime.

Buddhism applies the theory of dependent arising to explain the origination of endless cycles of dukkha and rebirth, through Twelve Nidānas (or twelve links).  It states that because Avidyā (ignorance) exists, Saṃskāras (karmic formations) exist; because Saṃskāras exist therefore Vijñāna (consciousness) exists; and in a similar manner, it links Nāmarūpa (the sentient body), Ṣaḍāyatana (our six senses), Sparśa (sensory stimulation), Vedanā (feeling), Taṇhā (craving), Upādāna (grasping), Bhava (becoming), Jāti (birth), and Jarāmaraṇa (old age, death, sorrow, and pain).  By breaking the circuitous links of the Twelve Nidanas, Buddhism asserts that liberation from these endless cycles of rebirth and dukkha can be attained.

Read more here and here.

Not-Self And Emptiness

A related doctrine in Buddhism is that of anattā (Pali) or anātman (Sanskrit).  It is the view that there is no unchanging, permanent self, soul or essence in phenomena.  The Buddha and Buddhist philosophers who follow him such as Vasubandhu and Buddhaghosa, generally argue for this view by analyzing the person through the schema of the five aggregates and then attempting to show that none of these five components of personality can be permanent or absolute.  This can be seen in Buddhist discourses such as the Anattalakkhana Sutta.

Emptiness or voidness (Skt: Śūnyatā, Pali: Suññatā), is a related concept with many different interpretations throughout the various Buddhisms.  In early Buddhism, it was commonly stated that all five aggregates are void (rittaka), hollow (tucchaka), and coreless (asāraka), for example as in the Pheṇapiṇḍūpama Sutta (SN 22:95).  Similarly, in Theravada Buddhism, it often simply means that the five aggregates are empty of a Self.

Emptiness is a central concept in Mahāyāna Buddhism, especially in Nagarjuna’s Madhyamaka school, and in the Prajñāpāramitā sutras.  In Madhyamaka philosophy, emptiness is the view which holds that all phenomena (dharmas) are without any svabhava (literally own-nature or self-nature) and are thus without any underlying essence, and so are empty of being independent.  This doctrine sought to refute the heterodox theories of svabhava circulating at the time.

Read more here and here.

The Three Jewels

All forms of Buddhism revere and take spiritual refuge in the three jewels (triratna): Buddha, Dharma and Sangha.

Read more here.

Image © of Kevin Standage via Wikipedia

Dharma Wheel And Triratna Symbols From Sanchi Stupa Number 2

Buddha

While all varieties of Buddhism revere Buddha and Buddhahood, they have different views on what these are.  Regardless of their interpretation, the concept of Buddha is central to all forms of Buddhism.

In Theravada Buddhism, a Buddha is someone who has become awake through their own efforts and insight. They have put an end to their cycle of rebirths and have ended all unwholesome mental states which lead to bad action and thus are morally perfected.  While subject to the limitations of the human body in certain ways (for example, in the early texts, the Buddha suffers from backaches), a Buddha is said to be deep, immeasurable, hard-to-fathom as is the great ocean, and also has immense psychic powers (abhijñā).  Theravada generally sees Gautama Buddha (the historical Buddha Sakyamuni) as the only Buddha of the current era.

Mahāyāna Buddhism meanwhile, has a vastly expanded cosmology, with various Buddhas and other holy beings (aryas) residing in different realms. Mahāyāna texts not only revere numerous Buddhas besides Shakyamuni, such as Amitabha and Vairocana but also see them as transcendental or supramundane (lokuttara) beings.  Mahāyāna Buddhism holds that these other Buddhas in other realms can be contacted and are able to benefit beings in this world.  In Mahāyāna, a Buddha is a kind of spiritual king, a protector of all creatures with a lifetime that is countless eons long, rather than just a human teacher who has transcended the world after death.  Shakyamuni’s life and death on earth is then usually understood as a mere appearance or a manifestation skilfully projected into earthly life by a long-enlightened transcendent being, who is still available to teach the faithful through visionary experiences.

Read more here

Dharma

The second of the three jewels is Dharma (Pali: Dhamma), which in Buddhism refers to the Buddha’s teaching, which includes all of the main ideas outlined above.  While this teaching reflects the true nature of reality, it is not a belief to be clung to, but a pragmatic teaching to be put into practice.  It is likened to a raft which is for crossing over (to nirvana) not for holding on to.  It also refers to the universal law and cosmic order which that teaching both reveals and relies upon.  It is an everlasting principle which applies to all beings and worlds.  In that sense it is also the ultimate truth and reality about the universe, it is thus the way that things really are.

Read more here.

Sangha

The third jewel in which Buddhists take refuge in is the Sangha, which refers to the monastic community of monks and nuns who follow Gautama Buddha’s monastic discipline which was designed to shape the Sangha as an ideal community, with the optimum conditions for spiritual growth.  The Sangha consists of those who have chosen to follow the Buddha’s ideal way of life, which is one of celibate monastic renunciation with minimal material possessions (such as an alms bowl and robes).

The Sangha is seen as important because they preserve and pass down Buddha Dharma.  As Gethin states “the Sangha lives the teaching, preserves the teaching as Scriptures and teaches the wider community.  Without the Sangha, there is no Buddhism.  The Sangha also acts as a field of merit for laypersons, allowing them to make spiritual merit or goodness by donating to the Sangha and supporting them.  In return, they keep their duty to preserve and spread the Dharma everywhere for the good of the world.

There is also a separate definition of Sangha, referring to those who have attained any stage of awakening, whether or not they are monastics.  This sangha is called the āryasaṅgha, the noble Sangha.  All forms of Buddhism generally revere these āryas (Pali: ariya, the noble ones or the holy ones) who are spiritually attained beings. Aryas have attained the fruits of the Buddhist path.  Becoming an arya is a goal in most forms of Buddhism.  The āryasaṅgha includes holy beings such as bodhisattvas, arhats and stream-enterers.

Read more here, here and here.

Image © of Basile Morin via Wikipedia

Buddhist Monks And Nuns Praying In The Buddha Tooth Relic Temple Of Singapore

Other Key Mahāyāna Views

Mahāyāna Buddhism also differs from Theravada and the other schools of early Buddhism in promoting several unique doctrines which are contained in Mahāyāna sutras and philosophical treatises.

One of these is the unique interpretation of emptiness and dependent origination found in the Madhyamaka school.  Another very influential doctrine for Mahāyāna is the main philosophical view of the Yogācāra school variously, termed Vijñaptimātratā-vāda (the doctrine that there are only ideas or mental impressions) or Vijñānavāda (the doctrine of consciousness).  According to Mark Siderits, what classical Yogācāra thinkers like Vasubandhu had in mind is that we are only ever aware of mental images or impressions, which may appear as external objects, but, as he says,  “there is actually no such thing outside the mind.”  There are several interpretations of this main theory, many scholars see it as a type of Idealism, others as a kind of phenomenology.

Another very influential concept unique to Mahāyāna is that of Buddha-nature (buddhadhātu) or Tathagata-womb (tathāgatagarbha).  Buddha-nature is a concept found in some 1st-millennium CE Buddhist texts, such as the Tathāgatagarbha sūtras.  According to Paul Williams these Sutras suggest that “all sentient beings contain a Tathagata’ as their ‘essence, core inner nature, Self”.  According to Karl Brunnholzl “the earliest Mahayana sutras that are based on and discuss the notion of tathāgatagarbha as the buddha potential that is innate in all sentient beings began to appear in written form in the late second and early third century.”  For some, the doctrine seems to conflict with the Buddhist anatta doctrine (non-Self), leading scholars to posit that the Tathāgatagarbha Sutras were written to promote Buddhism to non-Buddhists.  This can be seen in texts like the Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra, which state that Buddha-nature is taught to help those who have fear when they listen to the teaching of anatta.  Buddhist texts like the Ratnagotravibhāga clarify that the Self implied in Tathagatagarbha doctrine is actually not self.  Various interpretations of the concept have been advanced by Buddhist thinkers throughout the history of Buddhist thought and most attempt to avoid anything like the Hindu Atman doctrine.

These Indian Buddhist ideas, in various synthetic ways, form the basis of subsequent Mahāyāna philosophy in Tibetan Buddhism and East Asian Buddhism.

Read more here and here.

The above articles and the rest of the images on this page were sourced from Wikipedia and are subject to change.

Read notes etc. regarding the above post here.

Blog Posts

Notes And Links

The Birmingham Buddhist Vihara on Facebook.

The image above of the Dharma Wheel is the copyright of Wikipedia user Shazz.  It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 3.0).  You can find more great work from her by clicking here.

The image above of the Vesak Decorations In Sri Lankais the copyright of Wikipedia user Mithila Wijekoon.   It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 3.0). 

The image above of Mahākāśyapa is the copyright of Wikipedia user Daderot.   It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC0 1.0) and is in the Public Domain. 

The image above of Ajanta Caves, Cave 10 is the copyright of an unknown Wikipedia user.   It is in the Public Domain. 

The image above of Sanchi Stupa Number 3 is the copyright of Wikipedia user Daderot.   It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 3.0)

The image above of Buddhist Missions is the copyright of Wikipedia user Javierfv1212.   It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 4.0)

The image above of The Extent Of Buddhism And Trade is the copyright of Wikipedia user World Imaging.   It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 3.0). 

The image above of the Buddhist expansion throughout Asia is the copyright of Wikipedia user Gunawan Kartapranata.  It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 3.0).  You can find more great work from him by clicking here.

The image above of A Buddhist Triad is copyright unknown.   It is in the Public Domain.  It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 3.0).

The image above of Nalanda University is the copyright of Wikipedia user myself.  It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 2.5).

The image above of Vajrayana is copyright unknown.   It is in the Public Domain.

The image above of The Angkor Thom is the copyright of Wikipedia user Dmitry A. Mottl.   It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 4.0).  You can find more great work from him by clicking here.

The image above of the ancient map is the copyright of Wikipedia user Avantiputra7.   It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 3.0). 

The image above of the Emaciated Buddha Statue is the copyright of Wikipedia user Chainwit.   It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 3.0).   You can find more great work from this photographer by clicking here.

The image above of the Enlightenment Of Buddha is the copyright of Wikipedia user Chainwit.  It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC0 1.0) and is in the Public Domain. 

The image above of The Wheel Of Life is copyright unknown.  It is in the Public Domain.

The image above of the Ramabhar Stupa is the copyright of Wikipedia user myself.  It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 2.5).  

The image above of Buddha’s Spiritual Liberation is the copyright of Wikipedia user Photo Dharma (Anandajoti Bhikkhu)It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY 2.0).  You can find more great work from him by clicking here.

The image above of Dharma Wheel And Triratna Symbols From Sanchi Stupa Number 2 is the copyright of  Kevin Standage.  It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY 2.0).  You can find more great work from him by clicking here.

The image above of Buddhist Monks And Nuns Praying In The Buddha Tooth Relic Temple Of Singapore is the copyright of Wikipedia user Basile MorinIt comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY 4.0).  You can find more great work from him by clicking here.

Creative CommonsOfficial website.  They offer better sharing, advancing universal access to knowledge and culture, and fostering creativity, innovation, and collaboration. 

 

Christmas: A Christmas Carol By Charles Dickens – Screen Versions

Image © of Liliboas via iStock

I LOVE A CHRISTMAS CAROL!

Obviously, the original book is the best version of any format because it is the original source material but as long as other versions stick close to that source then I will more than likely enjoy it.

Below are just some of the MANY film and TV versions out there for your viewing pleasure.  Enjoy.

Read more about A Christmas Carol here

1900’s

I haven’t watched this version but I have included it as it is a silent movie piece of history and the earliest screen version that was made.

Read more about Scrooge, or, Marley’s Ghost (1901), starring Daniel Smith, here.

1910’s

Another version I  haven’t watched but again I have included it as it is a silent movie piece of history.  This one was made in America by the Edison Film Company and is the second earliest screen version after Scrooge, or, Marley’s Ghost (1901)  

Read more about A Christmas Carol (1910), starring Marc McDermott, here.

1930’s

Another version I haven’t watched but I have included it as it is a very early screen version.

Read more about Scrooge (1935), starring Seymour Hicks, here.

1950’s

This is a great screen version.

Read more about Scrooge (1951), starring Alastair Sim, here.

1970’s

This is my all-time favourite screen version and always brings fond memories of my Mom as we watched this every year together.

Read more about Scrooge (1970, starring Albert Finney, here.

This is a good screen-animated version. 

Read more about A Christmas Carol (1971), starring Alastair Sim, here.

1980’s

This is a great screen version.

Read more about A Christmas Carol (1984), starring George C. Scott, here.

1990’s

This is a great screen version.

Read more about A Christmas Carol (1999), starring Patrick Stewart, here.

Blog Posts

Notes And Links

Liliboas on iStock.  The image shown at the top of this page of a Christmas tree and presents is the copyright of Liliboas.  You can find more great work from the photographer Lili and lots more free stock photos at iStock.

Charles Dickens Museum – Official website.  The museum is situated at 48 Doughty Street, Dickens’s London home from 1837-1839.  He moved there with his wife Catherine and their eldest son Charlie.   After the Dickenses left Doughty Street, the property was largely used as a boarding house until the Dickens Fellowship purchased it as their headquarters in 1923.  The house opened to the public in 1925 and houses a significant collection linked to Dickens and his works. 

Today the Charles Dickens Museum is set up as though Dickens himself had just left.  It appears as a fairly typical middle-class Victorian home, complete with furnishings, portraits and decorations which are known to have belonged to Dickens.  A visit to the museum allows you to step back into 1837 and to see a world which is at once both intimately familiar, yet astonishingly different.  A world in which one of the greatest writers in the English language, found his inspiration. 

Charles Dickens Museum official Facebook page.

Charles Dickens Museum official Twitter page.

Project Gutenberg – Project Gutenberg is an online library of free e-books and was the first provider of free electronic books.  Michael Hart, the founder of Project Gutenberg, invented e-books in 1971 and his memory continues to inspire the creation of them and related content today.

All videos are via YouTube and their copyright belongs to whoever. 

Books: A Christmas Carol By Charles Dickens

A Christmas Carol 1843 first edition front cover via Project Gutenberg

This original illustration by John Leech is from the 1843 edition and is in the public domain. 

If you really know me well then you will know that Charles Dickens is my favourite author and A Christmas Carol is my favourite book by him.  I LOVE IT.

I have film and TV versions on DVD.  I have books of it.  I have it via a e-book and audiobook too. I can’t get enough of it.  Obviously the original book is the best because it is the original source material but as long as other versions  sticks close to that source then I will more than likely enjoy it.

Dickens changed the face of Christmas and made it into what we know it is today.  He has inspired many writers, myself included.  If I could jump in a time machine I would go back to Victorian times on Christmas Day and shake his hand and say thank you Charles for everything you have done and MERRY CHRISTMAS!

Read this book online, and get more download options and a bibliographic record on Project Gutenberg by clicking here.

For screen versions click here.

Listen to Neil Gaiman, via Open Culture,  read A Christmas Carol just like Charles Dickens read it by clicking here.

Below is the 1939 radio play to listen to that features not one old star legend but two, the late greats Lionel Barrymore and Orson Wells. 

About A Christmas Carol

A Christmas Carol 1843 first edition front cover: This original illustration by John Leech is from the 1843 edition and is in the public domain. Image via Project Gutenberg

A Christmas Carol.  In Prose.  Being a Ghost Story of Christmas, commonly known as A Christmas Carol, is a novella by Charles Dickens, first published in London by Chapman & Hall in 1843 and illustrated by John Leech.  A Christmas Carol recounts the story of Ebenezer Scrooge, an elderly miser who is visited by the ghost of his former business partner Jacob Marley and the spirits of Christmas Past, Present and Yet to Come.  After their visits, Scrooge is transformed into a kinder, gentler man.

Dickens wrote A Christmas Carol during a period when the British were exploring and re-evaluating past Christmas traditions, including carols, and newer customs such as cards and Christmas trees.  He was influenced by the experiences of his own youth and by the Christmas stories of other authors, including Washington Irving and Douglas Jerrold.  Dickens had written three Christmas stories prior to the novella and was inspired following a visit to the Field Lane Ragged School, one of several establishments for London’s street children.  The treatment of the poor and the ability of a selfish man to redeem himself by transforming into a more sympathetic character are the key themes of the story.  There is discussion among academics as to whether this is a fully secular story, or if it is a Christian allegory.

Published on the 19th of December, the first edition sold out by Christmas Eve.  By the end of 1844 thirteen editions had been released.  Most critics reviewed the novella favourably.  The story was illicitly copied in January 1844 and Dickens took legal action against the publishers, who went bankrupt, further reducing Dickens’s small profits from the publication.  He went on to write four other Christmas stories in subsequent years.  In 1849 he began public readings of the story, which proved so successful he undertook 127 further performances until 1870, the year of his death.  A Christmas Carol has never been out of print and has been translated into several languages.  The story has been adapted many times for film, stage, opera and other media.

A Christmas Carol captured the zeitgeist of the mid-Victorian revival of the Christmas holiday.  Dickens had acknowledged the influence of the modern Western observance of Christmas and later inspired several aspects of Christmas, including family gatherings, seasonal food and drink, dancing, games and a festive generosity of spirit.

1843 first edition title page: This original illustration by John Leech is from the 1843 edition and is in the public domain. Image via Project Gutenberg
Charles Dickens (in 1842, the year before the publication of A Christmas Carol) by Francis Alexander. Image via Wikipedia
John Leech by unknown is in the public domain. Image via Wikipedia

Characters

The central character of A Christmas Carol is Ebenezer Scrooge, a miserly London-based businessman, described in the story as “a squeezing, wrenching, grasping, scraping, clutching, covetous old sinner!” Richard Michael Kelly, from Broadway Press noted that Scrooge may have been influenced by Dickens’s conflicting feelings for his father, whom he both loved and demonised.  This psychological conflict may be responsible for the two radically different Scrooges in the tale (one a cold, stingy and greedy semi-recluse, the other a benevolent, sociable man).  The professor of English literature Robert Douglas-Fairhurst considers that in the opening part of the book covering young Scrooge’s lonely and unhappy childhood, and his aspiration for money to avoid poverty “is something of a self-parody of Dickens’s fears about himself”.   The post-transformation parts of the book are how Dickens optimistically sees himself.

Scrooge could also be based on two misers.  One being the eccentric John Elwes, M.P. or Jemmy Wood, the owner of the Gloucester Old Bank and also known as The Gloucester Miser.  According to the sociologist Frank W. Elwell, Scrooge’s views on the poor are a reflection of those of the demographer and political economist Thomas Malthus, while the miser’s questions “Are there no prisons? … And the Union workhouses? … The treadmill and the Poor Law are in full vigour, then?” are a reflection of a sarcastic question raised by the philosopher Thomas Carlyle, “Are there not treadmills, gibbets; even hospitals, poor-rates, New Poor-Law?”

There are literary precursors for Scrooge in Dickens’s own works. Peter Ackroyd, Dickens’s biographer, sees similarities between the character and the elder Martin Chuzzlewit character, although the miser is “a more fantastic image” than the Chuzzlewit patriarch.  Ackroyd observes that Chuzzlewit’s transformation to a charitable figure is a parallel to that of the miser.  Douglas-Fairhurst sees that the minor character Gabriel Grub from The Pickwick Papers was also an influence when creating Scrooge.  It is possible that Scrooge’s name came from a tombstone Dickens had seen on a visit to Edinburgh.  The grave was for Ebenezer Lennox Scroggie, whose job was given as a meal man (a corn merchant).  Dickens misread the inscription as mean man.  This theory has been described as a probable Dickens hoax for which no one could find any corroborating evidence.

When Dickens was young he lived near a tradesman’s premises with the sign Goodge and Marney, which may have provided the name for Scrooge’s former business partner.  For the chained Marley, Dickens drew on his memory of a visit to the Western Penitentiary in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in March 1842, where he saw, and was affected by seeing fettered prisoners.  For the character Tiny Tim, Dickens used his nephew Henry, a disabled boy who was five at the time A Christmas Carol was written.  The two figures of Want and Ignorance, sheltering in the robes of the Ghost of Christmas Present, were inspired by the children Dickens had seen on his visit to a ragged school in the East End of London. 

John Elwes by John Meggot Elwes is in the public domain. Image via Wikipedia

Reception

The transformation of Scrooge is central to the story.  Writer Paul Davis considers Scrooge to be “a protean figure always in process of reformation”.  Michael Kelly writes that the transformation is reflected in the description of Scrooge, who begins as a two-dimensional character, but who then grows into one who “possesses an emotional depth and a regret for lost opportunities”.  Some writers, including Grace Moore, the Dickens scholar, consider that there is a Christian theme running through A Christmas Carol, and that the novella should be seen as an allegory of the Christian concept of redemption.  Dickens’s biographer, Claire Tomalin, sees the conversion of Scrooge as carrying the Christian message that “even the worst of sinners may repent and become a good man”.  Dickens’s attitudes towards organised religion were complex.  He based his beliefs and principles on the New Testament.  Dickens’s statement that Marley “had no bowels” is a reference to the bowels of compassion mentioned in the First Epistle of John, the reason for his eternal damnation.

Other writers, including Kelly, consider that Dickens put forward a “secular vision of this sacred holiday”.  The Dickens scholar John O. Jordan argues that A Christmas Carol shows what Dickens referred to in a letter to his friend John Forster as his “Carol philosophy, cheerful views, sharp anatomisation of humbug, jolly good temper … and a vein of glowing, hearty, generous, mirthful, beaming reference in everything to Home and Fireside”.  From a secular viewpoint, the cultural historian Penne Restad suggests that Scrooge’s redemption underscores “the conservative, individualistic and patriarchal aspects” of Dickens’s “Carol philosophy” of charity and altruism.

Dickens wrote A Christmas Carol in response to British social attitudes towards poverty, particularly child poverty, and wished to use the novella as a means to put forward his arguments against it.  The story shows Scrooge as a paradigm for self-interest, and the possible repercussions of ignoring the poor, especially children in poverty (personified by the allegorical figures of Want and Ignorance).  The two figures were created to arouse sympathy with readers, as was Tiny Tim.  Douglas-Fairhurst observes that the use of such figures allowed Dickens to present his message of the need for charity, without alienating his largely middle-class readership.

William Makepeace Thackeray by unknown is in the public domain. Image via Wikipedia

The Plot

The book is divided into five chapters, which Dickens titled staves.

SPOILER ALERT: Skip this bit if you haven’t read the book and are planning to do so!

Stave One

A Christmas Carol opens on a bleak, cold Christmas Eve in London, seven years after the death of Ebenezer Scrooge’s business partner, Jacob Marley.  Scrooge, an ageing miser, dislikes Christmas and refuses a dinner invitation from his nephew Fred (the son of Fan, Scrooge’s dead sister).  He turns away two men who seek a donation from him to provide food and heating for the poor and only grudgingly allows his overworked, underpaid clerk, Bob Cratchit, Christmas Day off with pay to conform to the social custom.

That night Scrooge is visited at home by Marley’s ghost, who wanders the Earth entwined by heavy chains and money boxes forged during a lifetime of greed and selfishness.  Marley tells Scrooge that he has a single chance to avoid the same fate and he will be visited by three spirits.  He must listen to them or be cursed to carry much heavier chains of his own.

Marley's Ghost: This original illustration is by John Leech is from the 1843 edition and is in the public domain. Image via Project Gutenberg
Wretched woman with an infant: This original illustration is by John Leech is from the 1843 edition and is in the public domain. Image via Project Gutenberg

Stave Two

The first spirit, the Ghost of Christmas Past, takes Scrooge to the Christmas scenes of Scrooge’s boyhood, reminding him of a time when he was more innocent.  The scenes reveal Scrooge’s lonely childhood at boarding school, his relationship with his beloved sister Fan, and a Christmas party hosted by his first employer, Mr Fezziwig, who treated him like a son.  Scrooge’s neglected fiancée Belle is shown ending their relationship, as she realises that he will never love her as much as he loves money.  Finally, they visit a now-married Belle with her large, happy family on the Christmas Eve that Marley died.  Scrooge, upset by hearing Belle’s description of the man that he has become, demands that the ghost remove him from the house.

Mr. Fezziwig’s Ball: This original illustration is by John Leech is from the 1843 edition and is in the public domain. Image via Project Gutenberg
The Ghost of Christmas Past gets extinguished by Scrooge: This original illustration is by John Leech is from the 1843 edition and is in the public domain. Image via Project Gutenberg

Stave Three

The second spirit, the Ghost of Christmas Present, takes Scrooge to a joyous market with people buying the makings of Christmas dinner.  The Ghost then takes Scrooge to Bob Cratchit’s family feast and introduces his youngest son, Tiny Tim, a happy boy who is seriously ill.  The spirit informs Scrooge that Tiny Tim will die unless the course of events changes.  Afterwards, the spirit and Scrooge travel to celebrations of Christmas in a miner’s cottage, in a lighthouse, and on a ship at sea.  Scrooge and the ghost then visit Fred’s Christmas party.  Before disappearing, the spirit shows Scrooge two hideous, emaciated children named Ignorance and Want.  He tells Scrooge to beware them and mocks Scrooge’s concern for their welfare.

Scrooge’s Third Visitor: This original illustration is by John Leech is from the 1843 edition and is in the public domain. Image via Project Gutenberg
Ignorance and Want: This original illustration is by John Leech is from the 1843 edition and is in the public domain. Image via Project Gutenberg

Stave Four

The third spirit, the Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come, shows Scrooge a Christmas Day in the future.  The silent ghost reveals scenes involving the death of a disliked man whose funeral is attended by local businessmen only on condition that lunch is provided.  His charwoman, laundress and the local undertaker steal his possessions to sell to a fence.  When he asks the spirit to show a single person who feels emotion over his death, he is only given the pleasure of a poor couple who rejoice that his death gives them more time to put their finances in order.  When Scrooge asks to see tenderness connected with any death, the ghost shows him Bob Cratchit and his family mourning the death of Tiny Tim.  The ghost then allows Scrooge to see a neglected grave, with a tombstone bearing Scrooge’s name.  Sobbing, Scrooge pledges to change his ways.

Stave Five

Scrooge awakens on Christmas morning a changed man.  He makes a large donation to the charity he rejected the previous day, anonymously sends a large turkey to the Cratchit home for Christmas dinner and spends the afternoon with Fred’s family.  The following day he gives Cratchit an increase in pay, and begins to become a father figure to Tiny Tim.  From then on Scrooge treats everyone with kindness, generosity and compassion, embodying the spirit of Christmas.

The Last of the Spirits: This original illustration is by John Leech is from the 1843 edition and is in the public domain. Image via Project Gutenberg
Scrooge and Bob Cratchit celebrate Christmas: This original illustration is by John Leech is from the 1843 edition and is in the public domain. Image via Project Gutenberg

Publication

As the result of the disagreements with Chapman and Hall over the commercial failures of Martin Chuzzlewit, Dickens arranged to pay for the publishing himself, in exchange for a percentage of the profits.  Production of A Christmas Carol was not without problems.  The first printing contained drab olive endpapers that Dickens felt were unacceptable, and the publisher Chapman and Hall quickly replaced them with yellow endpapers, but, once replaced, those clashed with the title page, which was then redone.  The final product was bound in red cloth with gilt-edged pages, completed only two days before the publication date of the 19th of December 1843.  Following publication, Dickens arranged for the manuscript to be bound in red Morocco leather and presented as a gift to his solicitor, Thomas Mitton.

Priced at five shillings (equal to £26 in 2022 pounds), the first run of 6,000 copies sold out by Christmas Eve.  Chapman and Hall issued second and third editions before the new year, and the book continued to sell well into 1844.  By the end of 1844 eleven more editions had been released.  Since its initial publication the book has been issued in numerous hardback and paperback editions, translated into several languages and has never been out of print.  It was Dickens’s most popular book in the United States, and sold over two million copies in the hundred years following its first publication there.

The high production costs upon which Dickens insisted led to reduced profits, and the first edition brought him only £230 (equal to £24,000 in 2022 pounds)  rather than the £1,000 (equal to £104,000 in 2022 pounds) he expected.  A year later, the profits were only £744, and Dickens was deeply disappointed.

Reception

According to Douglas-Fairhurst, contemporary reviews of A Christmas Carol “were almost uniformly kind”.  The Illustrated London News described how the story’s “impressive eloquence… its unfeigned lightness of heart… its playful and sparkling humour… its gentle spirit of humanity” all put the reader “in good humour with ourselves, with each other, with the season and with the author”.  The critic from The Athenaeum, the literary magazine, considered it a “tale to make the reader laugh and cry… to open his hands, and open his heart to charity even toward the uncharitable… a dainty dish to set before a King.”  William Makepeace Thackeray, writing in Fraser’s Magazine, described the book as “a national benefit and to every man or woman who reads it, a personal kindness.  The last two people I heard speak of it were women; neither knew the other, or the author, and both said, by way of criticism, ‘God bless him!'”

The poet Thomas Hood, in his own journal, wrote that “If Christmas, with its ancient and hospitable customs, its social and charitable observances, were ever in danger of decay, this is the book that would give them a new lease.”  The reviewer for Tait’s Edinburgh Magazine Theodore Martin, who was usually critical of Dickens’s work spoke well of A Christmas Carol, noting it was “a noble book, finely felt and calculated to work much social good”.  After Dickens’s death, Margaret Oliphant deplored the turkey and plum pudding aspects of the book but admitted that in the days of its first publication it was regarded as “a new gospel”, and noted that the book was unique in that it made people behave better.  The religious press generally ignored the tale but, in January 1884, Christian Remembrancer thought the tale’s old and hackneyed subject was treated in an original way and praised the author’s sense of humour and pathos.  The writer and social thinker John Ruskin told a friend that he thought Dickens had taken the religion from Christmas, and had imagined it as “mistletoe and pudding, neither resurrection from the dead, nor rising of new stars, nor teaching of wise men, nor shepherds”.

There were critics of the book. The New Monthly Magazine praised the story, but thought the book’s physical excesses, the gilt edges and expensive binding, kept the price high, making it unavailable to the poor.  The review recommended that the tale should be printed on cheap paper and priced accordingly.  An unnamed writer for The Westminster Review mocked Dickens’s grasp of economics, asking “Who went without turkey and punch in order that Bob Cratchit might get them for, unless there were turkeys and punch in surplus, someone must go without”.

Following criticism of the US in American Notes and Martin Chuzzlewit, American readers were less enthusiastic at first, but by the end of the American Civil War, copies of the book were in wide circulation.  In 1863 The New York Times published an enthusiastic review, noting that the author brought the “old Christmas… of bygone centuries and remote manor houses, into the living rooms of the poor of today”.

Aftermath

In January 1844 Parley’s Illuminated Library published an unauthorised version of the story in a condensed form which they sold for twopence.  Dickens wrote to his solicitor and said. “I have not the least doubt that if these Vagabonds can be stopped they must… Let us be the sledge-hammer in this, or I shall be beset by hundreds of the same crew when I come out with a long story.”

Two days after the release of the Parley version, Dickens sued on the basis of copyright infringement and won.  The publishers declared themselves bankrupt and Dickens was left to pay £700 in costs.  The small profits Dickens earned from A Christmas Carol further strained his relationship with his publishers, and he broke with them in favour of Bradbury and Evans, who had been printing his works to that point.

Dickens returned to the tale several times during his life to amend the phrasing and punctuation.  He capitalised on the success of the book by publishing other Christmas stories: The Chimes (1844), The Cricket on the Hearth (1845), The Battle of Life (1846) and The Haunted Man and the Ghost’s Bargain (1848).  These were secular conversion tales which acknowledged the progressive societal changes of the previous year, and highlighted those social problems which still needed to be addressed.  While the public eagerly bought the later books, the reviewers were highly critical of the stories.

Performances And Adaptations

By 1849 Dickens was engaged with David Copperfield and had neither the time nor the inclination to produce another Christmas book.  He decided the best way to reach his audience with his Carol philosophy was by public readings.  During Christmas 1853 Dickens gave a reading in Birmingham Town Hall to the Industrial and Literary Institute. The performance was a great success.  Thereafter, he read the tale in an abbreviated version 127 times, until 1870 (the year of his death), including at his farewell performance.

In the years following the book’s publication, responses to the tale were published by W. M. Swepstone (Christmas Shadows, 1850), Horatio Alger (Job Warner’s Christmas, 1863), Louisa May Alcott (A Christmas Dream, and How It Came True, 1882), and others who followed Scrooge’s life as a reformed man, or some who thought Dickens had got it wrong and needed to be corrected.

The novella was adapted for the stage almost immediately.  Three productions opened on the 5th of February 1844, one by Edward Stirling being sanctioned by Dickens and running for more than 40 nights.  By the close of February 1844 eight rival A Christmas Carol theatrical productions were playing in London.  The story has been adapted for film and television more than any of Dickens’s other works.  In 1901 it was produced as Scrooge, or, Marley’s Ghost, a silent black-and-white British film.  It was one of the first known adaptations of a Dickens work on film, but it is now largely lost.  The story was adapted in 1923 for BBC radio.  The story has been adapted to other media, including opera, ballet, animation, stage musicals and a BBC mime production starring Marcel Marceau.

Davis considers the adaptations have become better remembered than the original.  Some of Dickens’s scenes, such as visiting the miners and lighthouse keepers, have been forgotten by many, while other events often added, such as Scrooge visiting the Cratchits on Christmas Day are now thought by many to be part of the original story.  Accordingly, Davis distinguishes between the original text and the “remembered version”.

Read more here.

Charles Dickens’ hand-edited copy of A Christmas Carol. Image via Open Culture
Charles Dickens’ hand-edited copy of A Christmas Carol. Image via Open Culture

You can read more about Charles Dickens’ hand-edited copy of A Christmas Carol here.

Legacy

The phrase Merry Christmas had been around for many years. The earliest known written use was in a letter in 1534 but Dickens’s use of the phrase in A Christmas Carol popularised it among the Victorian public.  The exclamation Bah! Humbug! entered popular use in the English language as a retort to anything sentimental or overly festive. The name Scrooge became used as a designation for a miser and was added to the Oxford English Dictionary as such in 1982

In the early 19th century the celebration of Christmas was associated in Britain with the countryside and peasant revels, disconnected to the increasing urbanisation and industrialisation taking place.  Davis considers that in A Christmas Carol, Dickens showed that Christmas could be celebrated in towns and cities, despite increasing modernisation.  The modern observance of Christmas in English-speaking countries is largely the result of a mid-Victorian revival of the holiday.  The Oxford Movement of the 1830’s and 1840’s had produced a resurgence of the traditional rituals and religious observances associated with Christmastide and, with A Christmas Carol, Dickens captured the zeitgeist while he reflected and reinforced his vision of Christmas.

Dickens advocated a humanitarian focus of the holiday, which influenced several aspects of Christmas that are still celebrated in Western culture, such as family gatherings, seasonal food and drink, dancing, games and a festive generosity of spirit.  The historian Ronald Hutton writes that Dickens “linked worship and feasting, within a context of social reconciliation”.

The novelist William Dean Howells, analysing several of Dickens’s Christmas stories, including A Christmas Carol, considered that by 1891 the “pathos appears false and strained; the humor largely horseplay; the characters theatrical; the joviality pumped; the psychology commonplace; the sociology alone funny”.   The writer James Joyce considered that Dickens took a childish approach with A Christmas Carol, producing a gap between the naïve optimism of the story and the realities of life at the time.

Ruth Glancy, the professor of English literature, states that the largest impact of A Christmas Carol was the influence felt by individual readers.  In early 1844 The Gentleman’s Magazine attributed a rise of charitable giving in Britain to Dickens’s novella.  In 1874, Robert Louis Stevenson, after reading Dickens’s Christmas books, vowed to give generously to those in need, and Thomas Carlyle expressed a generous hospitality by hosting two Christmas dinners after reading the book.  In 1867 one American businessman was so moved by attending a reading that he closed his factory on Christmas Day and sent every employee a turkey, while in the early years of the 20th century Maud of Wales (the Queen of Norway) sent gifts to London’s crippled children signed “With Tiny Tim’s Love”.  On the novella, the author G. K. Chesterton wrote “The beauty and blessing of the story… lie in the great furnace of real happiness that glows through Scrooge and everything around him… Whether the Christmas visions would or would not convert Scrooge, they convert us.”

Analysing the changes made to adaptations over time, Davis sees changes to the focus of the story and its characters to reflect mainstream thinking of the period.  While Dickens’s Victorian audiences would have viewed the tale as a spiritual but secular parable, in the early 20th century it became a children’s story, read by parents who remembered their parents reading it when they were younger.  In the lead-up to and during the Great Depression, Davis suggests that while some saw the story as a “denunciation of capitalism…most read it as a way to escape oppressive economic realities”.  The film versions of the 1930’s were different in the UK and US.  British-made films showed a traditional telling of the story, while US-made works showed Cratchit in a more central role, escaping the depression caused by European bankers and celebrating what Davis calls “the Christmas of the common man”.  In the 1960’s, Scrooge was sometimes portrayed as a Freudian figure wrestling with his past.  By the 1980’s he was again set in a world of depression and economic uncertainty.

Read more here

Blog Posts

Notes And Links

The images above are in the Public Domain via Wikipedia and Project Gutenberg.

Charles Dickens Museum – Official website.  The museum is situated at 48 Doughty Street, Dickens’s London home from 1837-1839.  He moved there with his wife Catherine and their eldest son Charlie.   After the Dickenses left Doughty Street, the property was largely used as a boarding house until the Dickens Fellowship purchased it as their headquarters in 1923.  The house opened to the public in 1925 and houses a significant collection linked to Dickens and his works. 

Today the Charles Dickens Museum is set up as though Dickens himself had just left.  It appears as a fairly typical middle-class Victorian home, complete with furnishings, portraits and decorations which are known to have belonged to Dickens.  A visit to the museum allows you to step back into 1837 and to see a world which is at once both intimately familiar, yet astonishingly different.  A world in which one of the greatest writers in the English language, found his inspiration. 

Charles Dickens Museum official Facebook page.

Charles Dickens Museum official Twitter page.

Project Gutenberg – Official website.  Project Gutenberg is an online library of free e-books and was the first provider of free electronic books.  Michael Hart, the founder of Project Gutenberg, invented e-books in 1971 and his memory continues to inspire the creation of them and related content today.

Open Culture – Official website.  Open Culture scours the web for the best educational media.  They find the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons and educational videos you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.

Jokes: More Adult Jokes (Part Three)

Image © of VHV.RS

Adult jokes are just that, aimed at adults and I take no credit for any on this page.  Their original source or words belong to whoever and started wherever.  I tell them my way.  If they make you smile or chuckle like they originally did to me then that is great.  If not then I hope you find your sense of humour one day.

As defined by Collins Online Dictionary: “An adult is a mature, fully developed person.  An adult has reached the age when they are legally responsible for their actions”.  Generally, that means 18 and over but if you are under 18 or easily offended then you are on the wrong page.

Turner Brown

There are two men in a lift.  One of them is a small skinny Irish bloke and the other is a huge guy.  The big man sees the little Irish man staring up at him and says to him, “7 feet,  25 stone, 20-inch cock, 3 pound balls,  Turner Brown.”

The little Irish man faints and falls to the floor.  The big guy kneels down and brings him to by softly shaking him.

In a weak voice, the little bloke says, ” What exactly did ya just say to me?”

The big bloke answered, “I saw your curious look and I figured I would give you the answers to the questions everyone always asks me when they see me… 7 feet,  25 stone, 20-inch cock, 3 pound balls, Turner Brown.”

The sweating little Irish man replied, ” Sweet Jasus, I tought you said TURN AROUND!” 

The Hillbilly Hunter

A hillbilly went hunting one day in West Virginia and bagged three ducks.  He put them in the bed of his pickup truck and was about to drive home when he was confronted by an ornery game warden who didn’t like hillbillies.

The game warden ordered to the hillbilly to show his hunting license, and the hillbilly pulled out a valid West Virginia hunting license.

The game warden looked at the license, then reached over and picked up one of the ducks, sniffed its arse, and said, “This duck ain’t from West Virginia.  This is a Kentucky duck. You got a Kentucky huntin’ license, boy?”

The hillbilly reached into his wallet and produced a Kentucky hunting license.

The game warden looked at it, then reached over and grabbed the second duck, sniffed its arse, and said, “This ain’t no Kentucky duck. This duck’s from Tennessee. You got a Tennessee license?”

The hillbilly reached into his wallet and produced a Tennessee license. 

The warden then reached over and picked up the third duck, sniffed its arse, and said, “This ain’t no Tennessee duck.  This here duck’s from Virginia.  You got a Virginia. huntin’ license?”

Again the hillbilly reached into his wallet and brought out a Virginia hunting license.

The game warden was extremely frustrated at this point, and he yelled at the hillbilly, “Just where the hell are you from?”

The hillbilly turned around, bent over, dropped his pants, and said, “You tell me, you’re the fuckin’ expert!”

Viagra

One day John went to see his 94-year-old grandpa at his nursing home.  When he got there he observed him looking happy and sprightly and that pleased him. 

“How are you doing grandpa?” he asks.

“I’m feeling fine son”, replied the old man.

“What’s the food like?” continued the grandson. 

“It’s lovely”, said the old man.  “The menus are fantastic.  We had beef stew today.  It was almost as good as your grandma’s was.”

“And the nursing? How is that?” John said.

“It couldn’t be any better.”  replied his grandad.  These young nurses really look after us all here.” 

“What about sleeping? Are you sleeping well enough?” asked John.

“There is no problem with that at all.” the old man replied.”  I get eight solid hours a night.  At 10 pm they bring me a hot cup of chocolate up and give me a viagra tablet, and that’s it, I go out like a light.”

John was alarmed to hear this and a bit confused so he rushed off to question the nurse in charge.

“Hello.” He said.  “I was wondering if you could clear something up for me please?” He then told her what his dad had just told him.

“Oh yes,” replied the nurse.  “He has told you correctly.  Every night at 10 pm we give him a hot cup of chocolate and a viagra, it works ever so well.  The hot chocolate makes him sleep right away and the viagra stops him from rolling out of the bed!”

In Heat

One day a young girl asks her mom, “Mom, can I take the dog for a walk around the block?”

Her mum replies, “No you can’t because she is in heat.”

“What does that mean?” asked the child.

“Go and ask your dad.  He is in his shed.”

The girl goes out to the shed and says, “Dad, can I take Lulu for a walk around the block? I asked Mom, but she said the dog was in heat, and to come to ask you.”

He took a rag, soaked it in petrol,  scrubbed the dog’s fanny with it to disguise the scent, and said, “OK, you can go now, but keep Lulu on her lead and only go one time around the block.”

The young girl left and returned a few minutes later with no dog on its lead.

The puzzled dad asked, “Where’s Lulu?”

His daughter replied, “She ran out of petrol about halfway around the block, so another dog is pushing her home!” 

Potato Clock

One day Paddy went into a John Lewis department store and asked one of the shop assistants, “Excuse me soir, but have ya got annie potato clocks?”

The assistant glares at him and says, “Are you taking the piss? We sell cuckoo clocks, carriage clocks, grandfather clocks and alarm clocks.  What the fuck is a potato clock?

Paddy replied, ” I don’t know but I start my new job at noin tomorrow and the woif said to me I better get a potato clock!”

The Midget

Me and this midget were in the pub toilets the other day taking a piss and he kept winking at me.

I said, ” Sorry mate, I am not gay.”

He replied, “Neither am I but you keep fucking splashing in my eye!”

Fugly

I was at a wedding recently and I whispered to the bloke next to me, “Isn’t that bride a right fucking ugly dog?”

“Do you mind?” came the angry reply, ” That is my daughter you are talking about.”

“Oh, I am sorry mate,” I said back rather embarrassed, ” I didn’t know you were her father.”

“I’m not!” Boomed the response, ” I am her fucking mother!”

 

STOP!

During my latest check-up at my doctor’s surgery, the very pretty nurse said to me, ” I think you should stop wanking!”

“Why nurse” I replied, “Will I go blind?”

“No” she answered, ” It’s because I am still talking to you!”

The Epileptic  

I was in the pub last night telling a friend a joke about an epileptic, “What would you do if an epileptic was having a fit in the bath?” My mate said he didn’t know and I told him, “Throw the washing in.”

There was a bloke at the next table who overheard the joke and said to me, “My brother is an epileptic and he had a fit in the bath and died.”

Fuck me, if the ground could have swallowed me up right there and then I would have been happy.  I replied, ” I am so sorry to hear that mate,  did he drown?”

“No”, he said, “He choked on one of my fucking socks!” 

Don’t Feed The Monkies

On his last day trip to Dudley Zoo Paddy was throwing lots of 20-pound notes into the monkey enclosure.  The zoo keeper tells him to stop right away as it is not allowed.

Paddy responded with, ” Of course it’s allowed!”

NO, IT IS NOT!” shouted the zoo keeper sternly.

“Bejasus, it is for sure it is!” replied Paddy.  ” It says roight here on this soign.. Don’t feed the monkeys.  £20 foin!”

Blog Posts

Notes And Links

GDJ on Pixabay – The image shown at the top of this page is the copyright of GDJ.  You can find more great work from the artist Gordon and lots more free stock photo’s at Pixabay.

Christmas: Nostalgic Christmas Adverts

Image © of Liliboas via iStock

The following adverts are from the 1980’s and 1990’s but may have the odd 1970’s thrown in!

These adverts are more entertaining than a lot of the drivel that is put on TV these days.  Enjoy your trip down memory lane.

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Blog Posts

Notes And Links

Poetry: A Harley Davidson Christmas Poem By Unknown

Image © unknown via iStock

Here’s a Christmas poem that made me smile.  It is a parody of A Visit from St. Nicholas by Clement Clarke Moore.

In case you didn’t know fanny means something completely different in America, it means a person’s bottom so Father Christmas isn’t a pervert, ha ha. 

Image © Unknown via Giggle Palooza

Father Christmas On A Harley Davidson.

A Harley Davidson Christmas Poem 

‘Twas the night before Christmas, and all through the pad,
There was nada happenin’, now that’s pretty bad.
 
The woodstove was hung up in that stocking routine,
In hopes that the Fat Boy would soon make the scene.
 
With our stomachs packed with tacos and beer,
My girl and I crashed on the couch for some cheer.
 
When out in the yard there arose such a racket,
I ran for the door and pulled on my jacket.
 
I saw a large bro’ on a ’56 Pan
Wearin’ black leathers, a cap, and boots (cool biker, man).
 
He hauled up the bars on that bike full of sacks,
And that Pan hit the roof like it was running on tracks. 
 
I couldn’t help gawking, the old guy had class.
But I had to go in, I was freezing my ass.
 
Down through the stovepipe he fell with a crash,
And out of the stove, he came dragging his stash.
 
With a smile and some glee he passed out the loot,
A new jacket for her and some parts for my scoot.
 
He patted her fanny and shook my right hand,
Spun on his heel and up the stovepipe, he ran.
 
From up on the roof came a great deal of thunder,
As that massive V-twin ripped the silence asunder.
 
With beard in the wind, he roared off in the night,
Shouting, “Have a cool Yule, and to all a good ride!
 
By Unknown.

Blog Posts

Notes And Links

The image at the top of the page is from unknown and is via iStock.

The image of Father Christmas on a Harley Davidson and the poem above are from unknown people but were sourced from Giggle Palooza.

Read about Harley-Davidson here.

Mental Health: I Am A Domestic Violence Survivor By Paul Hibbert

Image © Paul Hibbert via Hibbert Home Tech

Let me start by saying Domestic Violence / Domestic Abuse is WRONG (albeit if it is physical, mental or both), end of, regardless of if it is a man or woman who is the victim.  However, you rarely hear it mentioned or shown about it happening to men.  This needs to change NOW!

Let me tell you from daily experience we don’t all cope well regarding our mental health, despite what others may think differently.

This video brought tears to my eyes and after watching it I knew I had to share it on my website.

Paul posted this video as part of men’s mental health awareness month.  He is an inspiration and has my total admiration and respect for his honesty here and his braveness in publicly speaking out the way he is here.  Like him I want men to know THEY ARE NOT ALONE and if I can help in any way to get that message across then I will.  The more this video is seen the better and hopefully it will help someone.

About Paul Hibbert

Paul Hibbert is a UK-based journalist creating a broad range of technical product reviews and tutorials primarily on the Youtube platform.

He creates videos using honesty and humour as his fundamental principles.

Audiences that would not usually be engaged with technology who watch him will get a unique perspective and an engaging presentation style that is otherwise absent from the technology sector.

Blog Posts

Notes And Links

Hibbert Home Tech – The image shown at the top of this page is the copyright of Paul Hibbert and comes from his official website.

Hibbert Home Tech on Facebook. 

Hibbert Home Tech on Twitter

Hibbert Home Tech on Instagram.

Hibbert Home Tech on TikTok.

Hibbert Home Tech on Patron.Like me, if you can, help support Paul with his funny, informative and entertaining content here or make a one-off payment on PayPal by clicking here.  In Paul’s own words, “There’s no pressure to donate anything at all, but if I’ve helped you and you’re feeling generous then your kindness is welcome.”

Regarding domestic abuse, this is advice from Gov.UK.  Click the link for more information.

If you are in immediate danger, call 999 and ask for the police.  If you can’t speak and are calling on a mobile press 55 to have your call transferred to the police.  Find out how to call the police when you can’t speak here

Household isolation instructions do not apply if you need to leave your home to escape domestic abuse.  

The Men’s Advice Line – This website is run by Respect and is a confidential helpline specifically for male victims.

ManKind Initiative – Official website.  Their confidential helpline is available for male victims of domestic abuse and domestic violence across the UK as well as their friends, family, neighbours, work colleagues and employers.

They provide information, support and a signposting service to men suffering from domestic abuse from their current or former wife, partner (including same-sex partner) or husband.  This can range from physical violence or object throwing to abuse such as constant bullying or insults.

Men’s Aid Charity – Official website.  Formed in 2006 to help provide practical advice and support to men who have been abused, Men’s Aid has grown to represent the views of many individuals both male and female and is committed to helping those who have suffered from bias in the legal system, Family Courts or any other areas.  They strive to remove bias and prejudice from all parts of our Society and focus on providing help and assistance to anyone, regardless of gender or sexual orientation, who may need it, in particular males.

For further help and advice for men being abused click here.

Women’s Aid – Official website.  They are coming together across society and communities to end domestic abuse.

UKSaysNoMore – Official website.  They seek to unite and strengthen a diverse community of members and organisations nationwide to actively take a stand against domestic abuse and sexual violence under one powerful, visual symbol.  The campaign provides open-source tools and resources for individuals and organisations to take action and get involved in making a difference.  Together they can challenge the myths and misconceptions around these issues, share resources and information, and ultimately work together to make real positive change.

Bright Sky – This is a mobile app and website for anyone experiencing domestic abuse, or who is worried about someone else.  The app can be downloaded for free from the app stores.  Only download the app if it is safe for you to do so and if you are sure that your phone isn’t being monitored.

If you are experiencing domestic abuse and need immediate help, ask for A.N.I. in a participating pharmacy. ‘It stands for Action Needed Immediately.  If a pharmacy has the Ask for A.N.I. logo (below) on display, it means they’re ready to help.  They will offer you a private space, provide a phone and ask if you need support from the police or other domestic abuse support services.

Image © Government via Gov.UK

Local History: The Birmingham Buddhist Vihara

Image © Frank Parker

On Saturday 17th September 2022,  I visited the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara in Osler Street, Ladywood, Birmingham as part of Birmingham Heritage WeekI never realised there was a Buddhist Temple in Birmingham so it was a pleasant surprise to find out there was and I am glad I went.

It is such a peaceful, tranquil, and friendly place to visit. I HIGHLY RECOMMEND you visit this Peace Pagoda.  

The Birmingham Buddhist Vihara Photos

Click here to see photographic memories of my day out.  

About The Birmingham Buddhist Vihara

In 1975 Dr. Rewata Dhamma, the Founder and Spiritual Director of Birmingham Buddhist Vihara and Dhammatalaka Peace Pagoda, was invited to England where he established a Buddhist monastery in Birmingham as his base.

Since his arrival in England in 1975, the majority of those who have called on Venerable Dr. Rewata Dhamma for teaching have been English.  Impressed by this, and wishing well for the future of Buddhism in England, he realized that the teaching would only become truly established here once the British themselves took responsibility for its development. Buddhism is not a missionary religion in the sense that is usually understood.  Religion cannot be imposed from outside; it must develop in line with the culture in which it finds itself and how best to do this can only be truly understood by people who are native to that culture.  On the other hand, it is also necessary for these people to have some depth of understanding of Buddhism itself and so they must have training and information available to them which is suitable to their cultural background and age group.

Interest in Buddhism from schools, colleges and universities has steadily increased over the years and the Vihara has become one of the major centres in the West Midlands serving this need.  As Buddhism becomes increasingly an accepted part of comparative religious studies so they welcome the many groups and individuals who need information and guidance from them.  This encourages further development of Buddhism and practice for seekers of Buddhist knowledge.

In 1998 he accomplished the building of Dhamma Talaka Peace Pagoda, after years of planning, as a suitable resting place for the royal relics.

The Peace Pagoda is the only purpose-built Myanmar-style pagoda in the UK and can offer a unique educational and cultural experience to visiting students and groups of all ages.  The pagoda is a miniature replica of Shwedagon pagoda in Yangon, Myanmar, which is one of the most important pagodas in that country.  Visitors to the pagoda may learn about Theravada Buddhist beliefs, practices and meditation methods; students can also be given the opportunity to try meditation for themselves.

You can read more information and see what they have to offer on their website here.

In front of the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara. Image © Frank Parker

A Guide To The Dhammatalaka Peace Pagoda

Read an online e-book version of A Guide To The Dhammatalaka Peace Pagoda here.

Download A Guide To The Dhammatalaka Peace Pagoda in PDF format by clicking here.

If you don’t have a PDF reader you can download one from here 

Opening Times

Opening times vary depending on what is going on at the time.

To see what events are happening and when click here.

Address

29-31 Osler Sreet

Ladywood

Birmingham

B16 9EU.

Telephone

0121 454 6591.

General Enquiries

For general enquiries click here.

School Visit Enquiries

For school visit enquiries click here.

Open Day

Visit the Birmingham Heritage Week website (link above) to find out when the next open day will be.

Blog Posts

Notes And Links

The image shown at the top of this page is copyright of Frank Parker.

The videos shown above are via YouTube.

The Birmingham Buddhist Vihara on Facebook.

 

The Birmingham Buddhist Vihara Photos – Page 1

© Frank Parker

Here are photos I took on my first visit to the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara on 17/09/22.  

In front of the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
An older sign at the front of the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
The entrance to the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
The left lion at the entrance © Frank Parker
The right lion at the entrance © Frank Parker
The Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
Outside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
Outside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
Rewata Dhamma Hall outside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
Buddha statue outside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
Buddha statue outside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
Writing above the front door of the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
Wood carving on the front door at the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
Wood carving on the front door at the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
Wood carving inside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
Wood carving inside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
Wood carving inside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
Wood carved cabinet and ornaments inside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
Ornaments inside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
Wood carved cabinet and ornaments inside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker

Blog Posts

Links

 

The Birmingham Buddhist Vihara Photos – Page 2

© Frank Parker

Here are more photos I took on my first visit to the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara on 17/09/22.  

Ornaments inside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
Ornaments inside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
Baddamta Rewata Dhamma and wood carved chair inside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
Baddamta Rewata Dhamma inside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
Wood-carved chair inside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
Wood-carved chair inside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
Wood-carved chairs inside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
Wood-carved settee and gong inside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
A gong inside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
A gong inside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
A wooden cabinet and ornaments inside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
A wooden cabinet and ornaments inside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
A wooden cabinet, ornaments and books inside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
A trophy inside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
A cabinet and ornaments inside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
A cabinet and ornaments inside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
Inside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
Inside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
Inside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker
Inside the Birmingham Buddhist Vihara © Frank Parker

Blog Posts

Links