Halloween Photos (Part 3)

Image ©Toby Ord via Wikipedia

Growing up in England from a child to a teenager in the 1960’s, 1970’s and 1980’s, Halloween was an American thing you saw on the telly.  There was no dressing up and trick-or-treating, not in my family home anyway.  Even when my kids were younger I never really bothered much about Halloween.  It was just all too American for me and just liked the English traditions I was brought up with.  They had fun wearing masks, bobbing for apples etc. but we never went out dressed up knocking on people’s doors, in fact, I don’t recall ever seeing anyone else do it either. 

Nowadays all of the above is a common sight.  I am no killjoy and I don’t knock anyone who really enjoys it.  I admit it’s a fun thing for kids to do and a good excuse for a party for the adults which I have enjoyed going to in the past few years.  When you have suffered from depression and anxiety for as long as I have, just to be included can be a lifesaver.

The main thing I like about Halloween is dressing up and the Horror theme to it.  I have never celebrated  Halloween in my life in the past because, since I was a kid, I have loved horror.  Every day is Halloween for me, ha ha.

Below are photos of Halloween celebrations of me and my family over the years. 

The quality of some of these photos is not the greatest but I have tried to enhance them the best I can but they are worth reminiscing about on here regardless.

2021  (Continued) 

Click here for 2021 details.

Image © Frank Parker

Me and my sister Julie.  

Image © Julie Shingler

Me and my great nephew Billy.

Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker

My cool Freddy Krueger Halloween costume.

I won the Best Costume award for this.  Thank you to my niece Faye for that and the bottle of Bucks Fizz and the cool cover it was in that she crocheted herself.

Image © Frank Parker

Hey You Guys!

The day after the Halloween party I tried on the mask my sister Yvonne gave me what she wore of Sloth from The Goonies.

It doesn’t exactly look like him and I can guarantee it did in the stock photo from where it was purchased from.

I happily had it to add to my mask collection as Yvonne was just going to throw it away!  It is another mask that is not full over the head so my glasses can be worn underneath it if I decide to wear it again which I doubt but I am always happy to receive anything free regarding horror, masks and Halloween costumes.  They are all appreciated.  

2022 

This was my fifth Halloween party and I wore my cool Werewolf costume.  Like the previous years, the quality of the mask was nothing like in the photo from the place I ordered it from but I wasn’t unhappy about it because it was very close and I enjoyed wearing it.  It was my fourth favourite Halloween costume since I started wearing Halloween costumes.

I ordered myself some slip-on werewolf feet, and werewolf gloves and, just like most masks in stock photos that you buy, these were not as good quality as them and I didn’t like how the feet slipped on over your shoes but it was the best I could find.  I wore a blooded shirt with it.  I got some fake fur to stick to my chest using titty tape, ha ha.  I made my own meaty blood and that was a laugh (see below) and I used a severed hand prop (which I rubbed in dirt and sprayed fake blood on it) to complete the scary look to it all.

This wasn’t the werewolf I wanted to go as originally.  I wanted to go as the Universal Classic Monsters The Wolf Man version from 1941, starring Lon Chaney Jnr.  However, there wasn’t a mask available for him so I thought I would try and get a look similar to my favourite werewolf film ever, An American Werewolf In London.  I saw a very cool mask that would have been cool but after reading a lot of reviews and seeing you really get a PATHETIC version of it, (no surprise there), I decided to go for a generic werewolf look.  It bothered me that everything I wore didn’t match the same shade of brown but regardless it was a costume I enjoyed wearing.  

Picture this scene.  I had recently been attacked and bitten by a werewolf but I managed to get away somehow.  The next night there was a full moon and I changed into a wolf man.  I run around outside to find someone to kill. A bloke sees me, panics and runs into some nearby muddy woods.  I attack him and he falls to the ground.  I grab his legs and drag him.  Screaming, he grabs any fallen trees and branches he can to stop himself from going any further.  Desperately clawing the ground, his dirty hands could not save him now).  I  pounce on him, bite his throat and chew on it, causing blood to soak my shirt.  I bite one of his dirty hands off before running off with it in my hand to find my next victim.  This was the inspiration for the look I wanted to achieve for this Halloween party. I have always had a great imagination since I was little! 

This was another tight mask meaning I couldn’t wear my glasses underneath making it hard to see (especially in the dark) but I could wear my hearing aids which is always good at noisy parties.  However, it was not as tight as three years ago and I didn’t have to cut a slit in the back of it like I did with that one but I still had trouble getting it on and off.  Out of all my masks, this was the one I sweated the most in.  I was very hot wearing this.  I did put baby talcum powder in it but it made no difference.

As mentioned above, the meaty blood I made (the night before) was a laugh because, oh boy, did it smell! 

I used fake blood in a jug and added ripped-up cotton balls, green and red food colouring and washing-up liquid to get the colour and constancy of blood-stained chewed-up meat.  I just couldn’t get it how I pictured it in my head. 

I added more cotton wool and put it in the microwave (not shown) thinking the heat would help thicken it but that was a disaster.  The whole lot overflowed and made my microwave look like a horror scene from a film!

I was either getting too light, or too dark by adding a bit of red and brown sauce to it, too watery or too thick, by adding shredded tissue to it.  I added sweet pickle so the chunks in it would make it look like chunks of flesh.  Eventually, I was sort of happy with what I had (and you can see in the photos of it in my mouth and hanging from it, it looked realistic) but as you can imagine it smelled very tangy indeed and it sure did make the car stink on the journey there and it was noticed by people at the party too.  Still, it made the whole experience very memorable, ha ha.

The photos below were taken at my sister Julie’s house where I got ready and at my nephew Wayne’s house on the 30th of October, 2022.

Image © Frank Parker

My cool werewolf Halloween costume.

Complete with meat in my mouth and hanging from my fur.

Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker

My cool werewolf Halloween costume.

I had just got ready at Julie’s ready for the Halloween party.

Image © Julie Shingler
Image © Julie Shingler
Image © Julie Shingler
Image © Julie Shingler

My cool werewolf Halloween costume.

Image © Julie Shingler
Image © Julie Shingler

My cool werewolf Halloween costume.

It is thirsty work being a werewolf and killing people, ha ha.

Image © Julie Shingler

Me and my sister Julie. 

Image © Julie Shingler

Me and my great nephew Harley. 

Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker

Making fake bloodied meat. 

Image © Frank Parker

My cool werewolf Halloween mask.

The day after the Halloween party I washed my shirt and mask for keepsakes.  The wolf looks like he has had a stroke, ha ha.

Later that day I went to a kid’s get-together.  It wasn’t a Halloween party as such so I haven’t classed it as one. 

Anyway, I wasn’t sure what to wear so I cobbled an outfit together. I went as a devil.  I have had this mask for a long time.  my gloves were from my 2017 outfit and my cloak from the 2019 one. I already had the shrunken head (again from a long time ago as part of my horror collection).  This devil liked to shrink people’s heads, chop them off and keep them as souvenirs.

There’s that great imagination again!

The photos below were taken at my sister Julie’s house where I got ready on the 31st of October, 2022.

Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker

My devil Halloween costume.

Blog Posts

Notes And Links

This page contains links that send you to Wikipedia and is subject to change.

The image shown above of a carved pumpkin is the copyright of Wikipedia user Toby Ord.  It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 2.5)

The images above are copyright of Frank Parker unless stated.

The images above of me and my great nephew Billy, my cool werewolf Halloween costume and my sister Julie, and my great nephew Harley are copyright of Julie Shingler.

Creative Commons – Official website.  They offer better sharing, advancing universal access to knowledge and culture, and fostering creativity, innovation, and collaboration. 

Wikipedia – Official website.  Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit in good faith. Its purpose is to benefit readers by containing information on all branches of knowledge.  Hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, it consists of freely editable content, whose articles also have numerous links to guide readers to more information.  

Halloween Photos (Part 2)

Image ©Toby Ord via Wikipedia

Growing up in England from a child to a teenager in the 1960’s, 1970’s and 1980’s, Halloween was an American thing you saw on the telly.  There was no dressing up and trick-or-treating, not in my family home anyway.  Even when my kids were younger I never really bothered much about Halloween.  It was just all too American for me and just liked the English traditions I was brought up with.  They had fun wearing masks, bobbing for apples etc. but we never went out dressed up knocking on people’s doors, in fact, I don’t recall ever seeing anyone else do it either. 

Nowadays all of the above is a common sight.  I am no killjoy and I don’t knock anyone who really enjoys it.  I admit it’s a fun thing for kids to do and a good excuse for a party for the adults which I have enjoyed going to in the past few years.  When you have suffered from depression and anxiety for as long as I have, just to be included can be a lifesaver.

The main thing I like about Halloween is dressing up and the Horror theme to it.  I have never celebrated  Halloween in my life in the past because, since I was a kid, I have loved horror.  Every day is Halloween for me, ha ha.

Below are photos of Halloween celebrations of me and my family over the years. 

The quality of some of these photos is not the greatest but I have tried to enhance them the best I can but they are worth reminiscing about on here regardless.

2019  

This was my third  Halloween party and I wore my cool Nosferatu Halloween costume. Like the previous years, the quality of the Count Orlok mask was nothing like in the photo from the place I ordered it from but I wasn’t unhappy about it because it was very close and I enjoyed wearing it.  It has been my second favourite Halloween costume since I started wearing them.

I ordered myself some false nails (slightly exaggerated to give my fingers a more bony, scary look), a cloak to wear with it and I wore a black shirt, black trousers and black shoes to try and get the old-fashioned look to it all.

The mask was bloody tight! I had to cut a slit in the back of it and I still had trouble getting it on and off.  I couldn’t wear my glasses underneath which annoys me as it means I can’t see much, especially when it gets dark.  It was tighter around my left eye and caused my eye to open more but this added to the scary look, ha ha.

The photos below was taken at my sister Julie’s house where I got ready and at my niece Faye’s house (where the party was) on the 26th of September, 2019.

You can watch the classic 1922 silent film classic Nosferatu below.

Image © Frank Parker

My very cool Nosferatu mask.

Image © Frank Parker

After I got ready for the Halloween party, and had this photo taken on my phone, I noticed (as you can see here) that the nail from my right-hand thumb was missing and I had white make up on my shirt.  That was annoying as it spoiled the photo a bit for me.

My great niece Lucy helped me look everywhere for it (bless her) and I eventually found it in the bathroom where I got ready.

Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker

Me (minus a nail on my thumb) and my sister Julie in our Halloween costumes.

Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker

My very cool Nosferatu Halloween costume.

Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker

Me and my sisters Cathy and Julie in our Halloween costumes.

Image © Frank Parker

Me, my sister Cathy and my niece Joanne in our Halloween costumes.

Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker

Me and my niece Joanne in our Halloween costumes.

Image © Frank Parker

My very cool Nosferatu Halloween costume.

Image © Frank Parker

Me and my sister Yvonne in our Halloween costumes.

Nosferatu 1922 Silent Film In Full

The 1922 silent film Nosferatu or to give its full title, Nosferatu: A Symphony Of Horror.  It starred Max Schreck as Count Orlok.

The scene where Nosferatu’s shadow goes up the stairway is a classic scene and it scared me when I was very young. I never watched all of the film until I was older.

2020

There was no Halloween party this year thanks to COVID (the less I say about a lot of bull shit regarding this the better.  That’s a topic for another day).  Me and my sisters, Julie, Cathy and Yvonne did a video call so I never bothered with a full Halloween costume, just this crap demon ripping through a face mask and a bloody t-shirt.  As ever quality of the mask was nothing like in the photo from the place I ordered it from and this was the most I had ever been unhappy I had ever been because it was nothing like what I thought I was going to get.  I wasn’t surprised though due to experience but I didnt think it was going to be this bad.  I added blood to it to try and make it look better but I never enjoyed wearing it one bit and was glad to take it off after the call.  It was my worst Halloween costume since I started wearing them.

The mask wasn’t too tight like my mask from the year before and I didn’t have to cut a slit in the back of it like that one. I could wear my glasses underneath this one which was pleasing.

The photo below was taken at my house on Halloween, 2019.

Image © Frank Parker

2021

This was my fourth  Halloween party and I wore my cool Freddy Krueger costume.  Like the previous years, the quality of the mask was nothing like in the photo from the place I ordered it from but I wasn’t unhappy about it because it was very close and I enjoyed wearing it.  It was my third favourite Halloween costume since I started wearing Halloween costumes.

I ordered myself a hat to wear with it and I wore Freddy’s famous stripey jumper and gloves, black trousers and black shoes to try and get the full A Nightmare On Elm Street look.  The film starred Robert Englund as Freddy Krueger.

The was another tight mask meaning I couldn’t wear my glasses underneath again or my hearing aids making it hard to see (especially in the dark) and hear.  However, it was not as tight as two years ago and I didn’t have to cut a slit in the back of it like I did with that one but I still had trouble getting it on and off. At least this one didn’t hurt my left eye, ha ha.

The photos below were taken at my sister Julie’s house where I also got ready on the 30th of September, 2019.

Image © Frank Parker

My cool Freddy Krueger mask. 

Image © Frank Parker
Image © Julie Shingler

My cool Freddy Krueger Halloween costume. 

Image © Frank Parker

My cool Freddy Krueger mask.  

Image © Julie Shingler
Image © Julie Shingler

Me, my niece Joanne, great nephew Archie and brother-in-law Ken. 

Image © Julie Shingler

My cool Freddy Krueger Halloween costume.

Even Freddy needs to check his phone now and then, ha ha.

Image © unknown
Image © unknown
Image © unknown

Me and my sister Julie. 

Whatever I said it made Julie laugh out load, ha ha.

Blog Posts

Notes And Links

This page contains links that send you to Wikipedia and is subject to change.

The image shown above of a carved pumpkin is the copyright of Wikipedia user Toby Ord.  It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 2.5)

The images above are copyright of Frank Parker unless stated.

The images above of me in my cool Freddy Krueger Halloween costume and of me, my niece Joanne, great nephew Archie and brother-in-law Ken are copyright of Julie Shingler.

The images above of me and my sister Julie are unknown because I can’t remember who took them?!

Creative Commons – Official website.  They offer better sharing, advancing universal access to knowledge and culture, and fostering creativity, innovation, and collaboration. 

The 1922 silent film Nosferatu is in the public domain.

Wikipedia – Official website.  Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit in good faith. Its purpose is to benefit readers by containing information on all branches of knowledge.  Hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, it consists of freely editable content, whose articles also have numerous links to guide readers to more information.  

Halloween Photos (Part 1)

Image ©Toby Ord via Wikipedia

Growing up in England from a child to a teenager in the 1960’s, 1970’s and 1980’s, Halloween was an American thing you saw on the telly.  There was no dressing up and trick-or-treating, not in my family home anyway.  Even when my kids were younger I never really bothered much about Halloween.  It was just all too American for me and just liked the English traditions I was brought up with.  They had fun wearing masks, bobbing for apples etc. but we never went out dressed up knocking on people’s doors.  in fact, I don’t recall ever seeing anyone else do it either. 

Nowadays all of the above is a common sight.  I am no killjoy and I don’t knock anyone who really enjoys it.  I admit it’s a fun thing for kids to do and a good excuse for a party for the adults which I have enjoyed going to in the past few years.  When you have suffered from depression and anxiety for as long as I have, just to be included can be a lifesaver.

The main thing I like about Halloween is dressing up and the Horror theme to it.  I have never celebrated  Halloween in my life in the past because, since I was a kid, I have loved horror.  Every day is Halloween for me, ha ha.

Below are photos of Halloween celebrations of me and my family over the years. 

The quality of some of these photos is not the greatest but I have tried to enhance them the best I can but they are worth reminiscing about on here regardless.

1990’s

Happy times from back in the day.

I don’t know the exact date unfortunately of the following photos but it was in the 90’s.

Image © Frank Parker

My lovely son Frank Jnr and lovely daughter Debbie bobbing for apples. 

Image © Frank Parker

Frank Jnr and Debbie wearing Halloween masks.  

2017

The costume I wore this year was meant to be a zombie in grey clothes but it looked nothing like the photo I ordered it from.  Needless to say, I was not happy with it but I wore it anyway.  It wasn’t a full over-the-head mask so the only good thing about it was it wasn’t tight and I could wear my glasses underneath it which is good because it helps me see better, especially when it gets dark.  

Sadly I don’t have any other photos of it but I took it all to show Mom what I was wearing for the Halloween party at my sister Julie’s house that was in early November.

This was the first Halloween party I had ever been invited to.

This photo was taken at my mom’s bungalow on the 17th of October, 2017.

Image © Frank Parker

My lovely mom wearing the mask from my Halloween costume.

 

This wonderful photo of Mom’s fantastic smile was taken on the 3rd of November, 2017.

Image © Frank Parker

Mom wearing her Halloween costume at a 2017 Halloween party. 

Fireworks taken on the 3rd of November, 2017.

Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker

Fireworks at a 2017 Halloween party.

Tyler loved watching the fireworks.

Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker

My lovely grandson Tyler enjoyed the fireworks with his auntie Julie, his daddy and auntie Cathy at a 2017 Halloween party.   

Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker

Tyler enjoyed the fireworks with his auntie Julie at a 2017 Halloween party. 

Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker

Tyler enjoyed the fireworks with his auntie Cathy at a 2017 Halloween party.

Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker

Tyler enjoyed the fireworks at a 2017 Halloween party.

2018

This is my scary pumpkin man Halloween costume and, like the previous year, the quality of it was nothing like in the photo from the place I ordered it from.  Again I wasn’t happy about that but it was close so I felt OK wearing it and, due to it not being a full over-the-head mask again, it wasn’t tight and I could wear my glasses underneath it again which is as good as ever because it helps me see better, especially when it gets dark.  

I wore it with black trousers and used a severed hand prop (not shown) to complete the scary look to it all.

This was my second Halloween party but sadly I have no photos from it.

The photos below were taken at my house on the 27th of September, 2018 before we went to the Halloween party at my niece Joanne’s house.

Image © Frank Parker

My lovely granddaughter Kasey and me wearing our Halloween costumes before a 2018 Halloween party.

Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker

Kasey proudly showed off her Halloween costume and bag before a 2018 Halloween party. 

Image © Frank Parker

Kasey was very pleased with her Halloween nails before a 2018 Halloween party. 

Kasey loved stopping at mine over the Halloween holiday in 2018.

The photos below were taken on Halloween, 2018.

Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker

Kasey loved her Build-A-Bear wig and her visit to McDonald’s.

My lovely Dog Rosie looks like Donald Trump below, ha ha.

Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker

Rosie joined in with the Halloween holiday fun in 2018 wearing Kasey’s Build-A-Bear wig.

Blog Posts

Notes And Links

This page contains a link that sends you to Wikipedia and is subject to change.

The image shown above of a carved pumpkin is the copyright of Wikipedia user Toby Ord.  It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 2.5).

The images above are copyright of Frank Parker. 

Creative Commons – Official website.  They offer better sharing, advancing universal access to knowledge and culture, and fostering creativity, innovation, and collaboration. 

Wikipedia – Official website.  Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit in good faith. Its purpose is to benefit readers by containing information on all branches of knowledge.  Hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, it consists of freely editable content, whose articles also have numerous links to guide readers to more information.  

Television

Image © of Max Rahubovskiy via Pexels

Most of us have grown up watching a television screen of some sort.  For me, television was at its best in the 1970’s and 1980’s when it was proper family entertainment. 

I don’t watch much telly these days (and I certainly DO NOT watch the bullshit so-called news).  Like films, it has all become too woke for my liking.  What was once entertainment has become a form of brainwashing and lecturing and I don’t watch it live anymore. I don’t turn on my television much unless it is to watch a DVD via my DVD player, watch YouTube, or Amazon Prime, or watch something decent that fits in with my likes via my Amazon Fire TV stick 4K Max.  

I have plenty of favourite television programs over the decades as a child and older, but watching them with family in my favourite decade, the 70’s, will always hold the most special memories for me. 

I like most TV genres with my favourite being Horror and Science Fiction ones.  I have favourite actors and actresses the same as anyone else does and they will be shown on this page.  I am not going to list every telly programme I have watched in my lifetime, that would be IMPOSSIBLE to remember but I will list programmes I have watched and enjoyed that I think are worth watching for someone else but of course, your opinions may differ from mine, that’s life.  

About Televison

Television (TV), also referred to as telly, is a telecommunication medium for transmitting moving images and sound.  The term can refer to a TV set or the medium of TV transmission.  Television is a mass medium for advertising, entertainment, news, and sports.

Television became available in crude experimental forms in the late 1920’s, but only after several years of further development was the new technology marketed to consumers.  After World War II, an improved form of black-and-white TV broadcasting became popular in the United Kingdom (U.K.) and the United States (U.S.), and TV sets became commonplace in homes, businesses, and institutions.  During the 1950’s, telly was the primary medium for influencing public opinion.  In the mid-1960’s, colour broadcasting was introduced in the U.S. and most other developed countries.

The availability of various types of archival storage media such as Betamax and Video Home System (VHS) tapes, Laser Discs, high-capacity hard disk drives, Compact Discs (CD’s), Digital Versatile Discs (DVD’s, flash drives, high-definition (HD) DVD’s and Blu-ray Discs, and cloud digital video recorders has enabled viewers to watch pre-recorded material, such as movies, at home on their own time schedule.  For many reasons, especially the convenience of remote retrieval, the storage of television and video programming now also occurs on the cloud (such as the video-on-demand service by Netflix).  At the end of the first decade of the 2000’s, digital television transmissions greatly increased in popularity.  Another development was the move from standard-definition TV (SDTV) (576i, with 576 interlaced lines of resolution and 480i) to high-definition TV (HDTV), which provides a resolution that is substantially higher.  HDTV may be transmitted in different formats (1080p, 1080i and 720p).  Since 2010, with the invention of smart television, Internet television has increased the availability of television programs and movies via the Internet through streaming video services such as Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, and Hulu.

In 2013, 79% of the world’s households owned a television set.  The replacement of earlier cathode-ray tube (CRT) screen displays with compact, energy-efficient, flat-panel alternative technologies such as liquid-crystal display (LCD) both fluorescent backlit and light-emitting diode (LED), organic light-emitting diode (OLED) and plasma displays was a hardware revolution that began with computer monitors in the late 1990’s.  Most television sets sold in the 2000’s were flat-panel, mainly LED’s.  Major manufacturers announced the discontinuation of CRT, Digital Light Processing (DLP), plasma, and even fluorescent-backlit LCD TV’s by the mid-2010’s.  In the near future, LED’s are expected to be gradually replaced by OLED TV’s.  Also, major manufacturers have announced that they will increasingly produce smart TV’s in the mid-2010’s.  Smart TVs with integrated Internet and Web 2.0 functions became the dominant form of television by the late 2010’s.

Television signals were initially distributed only as terrestrial television using high-powered radio-frequency television transmitters to broadcast the signal to individual television receivers.  Alternatively, television signals are distributed by coaxial cable or optical fibre, satellite systems and, since the 2000’s via the Internet.  Until the early 2000’s, these were transmitted as analogue signals, but a transition to digital television was expected to be completed worldwide by the late 2010’s.  A standard television set consists of multiple internal electronic circuits, including a tuner for receiving and decoding broadcast signals.  A visual display device that lacks a tuner is correctly called a video monitor rather than a television.

Image © Wags05 via Wikipedia

Flat-screen televisions for sale at a consumer electronics store in 2008.

Etymology

The word television comes from the Ancient Greek τῆλε (tele) meaning far, and Latin visio meaning sight.  The first documented usage of the term dates back to 1900, when the Russian scientist Constantin Perskyi used it in a paper that he presented in French at the first International Congress of Electricity, which ran from the 18th to the 25th of August 1900 during the International World Fair in Paris.

The anglicised version of the term was first attested in 1907 when it was classed as a theoretical system to transmit moving images over telegraph or telephone wires.  It was formed in English or borrowed from the French word télévision.  In the 19th century and early 20th century, other proposals for the name of a then-hypothetical technology for sending pictures over distance were telephote (1880) and televista (1904).

The abbreviation TV is from 1948.  The use of the term to mean a television set dates from 1941.  The use of the term to mean television as a medium dates from 1927.

The term telly is more common in the United Kingdom (U.K).  The slang term the tube or the boob tube derives from the bulky cathode-ray tube used on most TV’s until the advent of flat-screen tellies.  

The History Of Television

Mechanical Television

Read more about Mechanical Television here.

Facsimile transmission systems (FAX) for still photographs pioneered methods of mechanical scanning of images in the early 19th century.  Alexander Bain introduced the facsimile machine between 1843 and 1846.  Frederick Bakewell demonstrated a working laboratory version in 1851.  Willoughby Smith discovered the photoconductivity of the element selenium in 1873.  As a 23-year-old German university student, Paul Julius Gottlieb Nipkow proposed and patented the Nipkow disk in 1884 in Berlin.  This was a spinning disk with a spiral pattern of holes in it, so each hole scanned a line of the image.  Although he never built a working model of the system, variations of Nipkow’s spinning disk image rasteriser became exceedingly common.  Constantin Perskyi coined the word television (TV) in a paper read to the International Electricity Congress at the International World Fair in Paris on the 24th of August, 1900.  Perskyi’s paper reviewed the existing electromechanical technologies, mentioning the work of Nipkow and others.  However, it was not until 1907 that developments in amplification tube technology by Lee de Forest and Arthur Korn, among others, made the design practical.

The first demonstration of the live transmission of images was by Georges Rignoux and A. Fournier in Paris in 1909.  A matrix of 64 selenium cells, individually wired to a mechanical commutator, served as an electronic retina.  In the receiver, a type of Kerr cell modulated the light and a series of differently angled mirrors attached to the edge of a rotating disc scanned the modulated beam onto the display screen.  A separate circuit regulated synchronisation.  The 8×8 pixel resolution in this proof-of-concept demonstration was just sufficient to clearly transmit individual letters of the alphabet.  An updated image was transmitted several times each second.

In 1911, Boris Rosing and his student Vladimir Zworykin created a system that used a mechanical mirror-drum scanner to transmit, in Zworykin’s words, “very crude images” over wires to the Braun tube (cathode-ray tube) in the receiver.  Moving images was not possible because in the scanner the sensitivity was not enough and the selenium cell was very laggy.

In 1921, Edouard Belin sent the first image via radio waves with his belinograph.

By the 1920’s, when amplification made TV practical, Scottish inventor John Logie Baird employed the Nipkow disk in his prototype video systems.  On the 25th of March, 1925, Baird gave the first public demonstration of televised silhouette images in motion, at Selfridges’s department store in London.  Since human faces had inadequate contrast to show up in his primitive system, he televised a ventriloquist’s dummy named Stooky Bill, whose painted face had higher contrast, talking and moving.  By the 26th of January, 1926, he had demonstrated before members of the Royal Institution the transmission of an image of a face in motion by radio.  This is widely regarded as the world’s first true public TV demonstration, exhibiting light, shade and detail.  Baird’s system used the Nipkow disk for both scanning the image and displaying it.  A brightly illuminated subject was placed in front of a spinning Nipkow disk set with lenses which swept images across a static photocell.  The thallium sulphide (Thalofide) cell, developed by Theodore Case in the United States (U.S.), detected the light reflected from the subject and converted it into a proportional electrical signal.  This was transmitted by Amplitude Modulation (AM) radio waves to a receiver unit, where the video signal was applied to a neon light behind a second Nipkow disk rotating synchronised with the first.  The brightness of the neon lamp was varied in proportion to the brightness of each spot on the image.  As each hole in the disk passed by, one scan line of the image was reproduced.  Baird’s disk had 30 holes, producing an image with only 30 scan lines, just enough to recognize a human face.  In 1927, Baird transmitted a signal over 438 miles (705 km) of telephone line between London and Glasgow.  Baird’s original televisor now resides in the Science Museum, South Kensington.

In 1928, Baird’s company (Baird Television Development Company/Cinema Television) broadcast the first transatlantic TV signal, between London and New York, and the first shore-to-ship transmission.  In 1929, he became involved in the first experimental mechanical TV service in Germany.  In November of the same year, Baird and Bernard Natan of Pathe established France’s first television company, Television-Baird-Natan.  In 1931, he made the first outdoor remote broadcast, of The Derby.  In 1932, he demonstrated ultra-short-wave (USW) television.  Baird’s mechanical system reached a peak of 240 lines of resolution on the British Broadcasting Company’s (BBC) telecasts in 1936, though the mechanical system did not scan the televised scene directly.  Instead, a 17.5 mm film was shot, rapidly developed and then scanned while the film was still wet.

A U.S. inventor, Charles Francis Jenkins, also pioneered the television.  He published an article on Motion Pictures by Wireless in 1913 and transmitted moving silhouette images for witnesses in December 1923.  On the 13th of June, 1925, he publicly demonstrated the synchronised transmission of silhouette pictures.  In 1925 Jenkins used the Nipkow disk and transmitted the silhouette image of a toy windmill in motion, over a distance of 5 miles (8 km), from a naval radio station in Maryland to his laboratory in Washington, D.C., using a lensed disk scanner with a 48-line resolution.  He was granted U.S. Patent No. 1,544,156 (Transmitting Pictures over Wireless) on the 30th of June, 1925 and filed it on the 13th of March, 1922.

Herbert E. Ives and Frank Gray of Bell Telephone Laboratories gave a dramatic demonstration of mechanical television on the 7th of April, 1927.  Their reflected-light television system included both small and large viewing screens.  The small receiver had a 2-inch-wide by 2.5-inch-high screen (5 by 6 cm).  The large receiver had a screen 24 inches wide by 30 inches high (60 by 75 cm).  Both sets could reproduce reasonably accurate, monochromatic, moving images.  Along with the pictures, the sets received synchronised sound.  The system transmitted images over two paths.  The first was a copper wire link from Washington to New York City, then a radio link from Whippany, New Jersey.  Comparing the two transmission methods, viewers noted no difference in quality.  Subjects of the telecast included Secretary of Commerce Herbert Hoover.  A flying-spot scanner beam illuminated these subjects.  The scanner that produced the beam had a 50-aperture disk.  The disc revolved at a rate of 18 frames per second, capturing one frame about every 56 milliseconds (today’s systems typically transmit 30 or 60 frames per second, or one frame every 33.3 or 16.7 milliseconds respectively).  Telly historian Albert Abramson underscored the significance of the Bell Labs demonstration and said, “It was in fact the best demonstration of a mechanical television system ever made to this time. It would be several years before any other system could even begin to compare with it in picture quality.”

In 1928, WRGB, then W2XB, was started as the world’s first TV station.  It was broadcast from the General Electric (GE) facility in Schenectady, N.Y.  It was popularly known as WGY Television.  Meanwhile, in the Soviet Union, Leon Theremin had been developing a mirror drum-based television, starting with 16 lines resolution in 1925, then 32 lines and eventually 64 using interlacing in 1926.  As part of his thesis, on the 7th of May, 1926, he electrically transmitted, and then projected, near-simultaneous moving images on a 5-square-foot (0.46 m2) screen.

By 1927 Theremin had achieved an image of 100 lines, a resolution that was not surpassed until May 1932 by Radio Corporation of America (RCA), with 120 lines.

On Christmas Day in 1926, Kenjiro Takayanagi demonstrated a television system with a 40-line resolution that employed a Nipkow disk scanner and cathode ray tubes (CRT) display at Hamamatsu Industrial High School in Japan.  This prototype is still on display at the Takayanagi Memorial Museum at Shizuoka University, Hamamatsu Campus.  His research in creating a production model was halted by the SCAP after World War II.

Because only a limited number of holes could be made in the disks, and disks beyond a certain diameter became impractical, image resolution on mechanical television broadcasts was relatively low, ranging from about 30 lines up to 120 or so.  Nevertheless, the image quality of 30-line transmissions steadily improved with technical advances, and by 1933 the United Kingdom (U.K.) broadcasts using the Baird system were remarkably clear.  A few systems ranging into the 200-line region also went on the air. Two of these were the 180-line system that Compagnie des Compteurs installed in Paris in 1935, and the 180-line system that Peck Television Corp. started in 1935 at station VE9AK in Montreal.  The advancement of all-electronic television (including image dissectors and other camera tubes and CRT’s for the reproducer) marked the start of the end for mechanical systems as the dominant form of television.  Mechanical TV, despite its inferior image quality and generally smaller picture, would remain the primary television technology until the 1930’s.  The last mechanical telecasts ended in 1939 at stations run by a lot of public universities in the U.S.

Image © of Hzeller via Wikipedia
Image © of Orrin Dunlap, Jnr.

John Logie Baird in 1925 with his televisor equipment and dummies James (on the left) and Stooky Bill (on the right). 

The above image is on page 650 of Popular Radio magazine, Vol. 10, No. 7, dated November 1926. It was published by Popular Radio, Inc. in New York, U.S.A.  You can download a copy of this magazine via World Radio History by clicking here.

Electronic Television 

Read more about Electronic Television here.

In 1897, English physicist J. J. Thomson was able, in his three well-known experiments, to deflect cathode rays, a fundamental function of the modern cathode-ray tube. The earliest version of the cathode ray tube (CRT) was invented by the German physicist Ferdinand Braun in 1897 and is also known as the Braun tube.  It was a cold-cathode diode, a modification of the Crookes tube, with a phosphor-coated screen.  Braun was the first to conceive the use of a CRT as a display device.  The Braun tube became the foundation of 20th-century television.  In 1906 the Germans Max Dieckmann and Gustav Glage produced raster images for the first time in a CRT.  In 1907, Russian scientist Boris Rosing used a CRT in the receiving end of an experimental video signal to form a picture.  He managed to display simple geometric shapes on the screen.

In 1908, Alan Archibald Campbell-Swinton, fellow of the Royal Society, published a letter in the scientific journal Nature in which he described how distant electric vision could be achieved by using a cathode-ray tube, or Braun tube, as both a transmitting and receiving device, he expanded on his vision in a speech given in London in 1911 and reported in The Times and the Journal of the Rontgen Society in another letter to Nature published in October 1926.  Campbell-Swinton also announced the results of some not-very-successful experiments he had conducted with G. M. Minchin and J. C. M. Stanton.  They attempted to generate an electrical signal by projecting an image onto a selenium-coated metal plate that was simultaneously scanned by a cathode ray beam.  These experiments were conducted before March 1914, when Minchin died, but they were later repeated by two different teams in 1937, by H. Miller and J. W. Strange from Electric and Musical Industries Ltd. (EMI), and by H. Iams and A. Rose from Radio Corporation of America (RCA).  Both teams succeeded in transmitting very faint images with the original Campbell-Swinton’s selenium-coated plate.  Although others had experimented with using a cathode-ray tube as a receiver, the concept of using one as a transmitter was novel.  The first cathode-ray tube to use a hot cathode was developed by John B. Johnson (who gave his name to the term Johnson noise) and Harry Weiner Weinhart of Western Electric and became a commercial product in 1922.

In 1926, Hungarian engineer Kalman Tihanyi designed a television (TV) system using fully electronic scanning and display elements and employing the principle of charge storage within the scanning (or camera) tube.  The problem of low sensitivity to light resulting in low electrical output from transmitting (or camera) tubes would be solved with the introduction of charge-storage technology by Kalman Tihanyi beginning in 1924.  His solution was a camera tube that accumulated and stored electrical charges (photoelectrons) within the tube throughout each scanning cycle.  The device was first described in a patent application he filed in Hungary in March 1926 for a television system he called Radioskop.  After further refinements included in a 1928 patent application, Tihanyi’s patent was declared void in Great Britain in 1930, so he applied for patents in the United States (U.S.).  Although his breakthrough would be incorporated into RCA’s iconoscope design in 1931, the U.S. patent for Tihanyi’s transmitting tube would not be granted until May 1939.  The patent for his receiving tube had been granted the previous October.  Both patents had been purchased by RCA prior to their approval.  Charge storage remains a basic principle in the design of imaging devices for television to the present day.  On Christmas Day, 1926, at Hamamatsu Industrial High School in Japan, Japanese inventor Kenjiro Takayanagi demonstrated a TV system with a 40-line resolution that employed a CRT display.  This was the first working example of a fully electronic television receiver and Takayanagi’s team later made improvements to this system parallel to other TV developments.  Takayanagi did not apply for a patent.

In the 1930’s, Allen B. DuMont made the first CRT to last 1,000 hours of use, which was one of the factors that led to the widespread adoption of TV.

On the 7th of September 1927, U.S. inventor Philo Farnsworth’s image dissector camera tube transmitted its first image, a simple straight line, at his laboratory at 202 Green Street in San Francisco.  By the 3rd of September 1928, Farnsworth had developed the system sufficiently to hold a demonstration for the press.  This is widely regarded as the first electronic television demonstration.  In 1929, the system was improved further by the elimination of a motor generator, so that his television system now had no mechanical parts.  That year, Farnsworth transmitted the first live human images with his system, including a three-and-a-half-inch image of his wife Elma (nicknamed Pem) with her eyes closed (possibly due to the bright lighting required).

Meanwhile, Vladimir Zworykin was also experimenting with the cathode-ray tube to create and show images.  While working for Westinghouse Electric in 1923, he began to develop an electronic camera tube.  But in a 1925 demonstration, the image was dim, had low contrast, and poor definition, and was stationary.  Zworykin’s imaging tube never got beyond the laboratory stage but RCA, which acquired the Westinghouse patent, asserted that the patent for Farnsworth’s 1927 image dissector was written so broadly that it would exclude any other electronic imaging device.  Thus RCA, on the basis of Zworykin’s 1923 patent application, filed a patent interference suit against Farnsworth. The U.S. Patent Office examiner disagreed in a 1935 decision, finding priority of invention for Farnsworth against Zworykin.  Farnsworth claimed that Zworykin’s 1923 system could not produce an electrical image of the type to challenge his patent.  Zworykin received a patent in 1928 for a colour transmission version of his 1923 patent application.  He also divided his original application in 1931.  Zworykin was unable or unwilling to introduce evidence of a working model of his tube that was based on his 1923 patent application. In September 1939, after losing an appeal in the courts, and being determined to go forward with the commercial manufacturing of television equipment, RCA agreed to pay Farnsworth US$1 million over a ten-year period, in addition to license payments, to use his patents.

In 1933, RCA introduced an improved camera tube that relied on Tihanyi’s charge storage principle.  Called the Iconoscope by Zworykin, the new tube had a light sensitivity of about 75,000 lux and thus was claimed to be much more sensitive than Farnsworth’s image dissector.  However, Farnsworth had overcome his power issues with his Image Dissector through the invention of a completely unique multipactor device that he began work on in 1930, and demonstrated in 1931.  This small tube could amplify a signal reportedly to the 60th power or better and showed great promise in all fields of electronics.  Unfortunately, an issue with the multipactor was that it wore out at an unsatisfactory rate.

At the Berlin Radio Show in August 1931 in Berlin, Manfred von Ardenne gave a public demonstration of a television system using a CRT for both transmission and reception, the first completely electronic television transmission.  However, Ardenne had not developed a camera tube, using the CRT instead as a flying-spot scanner to scan slides and film.  Ardenne achieved his first transmission of TV pictures on Christmas Eve, 1933, followed by test runs for a public television service in 1934.  The world’s first electronically scanned TV service started in Berlin in 1935, the Fernsehsender Paul Nipkow, culminating in the live broadcast of the 1936 Summer Olympic Games from Berlin to public places all over Germany.

Philo Farnsworth gave the world’s first public demonstration of an all-electronic TV system, using a live camera, at the Franklin Institute of Philadelphia on the 25th of August 1934, and for ten days afterwards.  Mexican inventor Guillermo Gonzalez Camarena also played an important role in early telly.  His experiments with TV (known as telectroescopía at first) began in 1931 and led to a patent for the trichromatic field sequential system colour TV in 1940.  In Britain, the EMI engineering team led by Isaac Shoenberg applied in 1932 for a patent for a new device they called the Emitron, which formed the heart of the cameras they designed for the British Broadcasting Company (BBC).   On the 2nd of November 1936, a 405-line broadcasting service employing the Emitron began at studios in Alexandra Palace, and transmitted from a specially built mast atop one of the Victorian building’s towers.  It alternated for a short time with Baird’s mechanical system in adjoining studios but was more reliable and visibly superior.  This was the world’s first regular high-definition television (HDTV) service. 

The original U.S. iconoscope was noisy, had a high ratio of interference to signal, and ultimately gave disappointing results, especially when compared to the high-definition (HD) mechanical scanning systems that became available.  The Electric and Musical Industries Ltd. (EMI) team, under the supervision of Isaac Shoenberg, analysed how the iconoscope (or Emitron) produces an electronic signal and concluded that its real efficiency was only about 5% of the theoretical maximum.  They solved this problem by developing, and patenting in 1934, two new camera tubes dubbed super-Emitron and CPS Emitron.  The super-Emitron was between ten and fifteen times more sensitive than the original Emitron and iconoscope tubes and, in some cases, this ratio was considerably greater.  It was used for outside broadcasting by the British Broadcasting Company (BBC), for the first time, on Armistice Day 1937, when the general public could watch on a TV set as the King laid a wreath at the Cenotaph.  This was the first time that anyone had broadcast a live street scene from cameras installed on the roof of neighbouring buildings because neither Farnsworth nor R.C.A. would do the same until the 1939 New York World’s Fair.

On the other hand, in 1934, Zworykin shared some patent rights with the German licensee company Telefunken.  The image iconoscope (Superikonoskop in Germany) was produced as a result of the collaboration.  This tube is essentially identical to the super-Emitron.  The production and commercialisation of the super-Emitron and image iconoscope in Europe were not affected by the patent war between Zworykin and Farnsworth, because Dieckmann and Hell had priority in Germany for the invention of the image dissector, having submitted a patent application for their Lichtelektrische Bildzerlegerrohre fur Fernseher (Photoelectric Image Dissector Tube for Television) in Germany in 1925, two years before Farnsworth did the same in the United States.  The image iconoscope (Superikonoskop) became the industrial standard for public broadcasting in Europe from 1936 until 1960 when it was replaced by the vidicon and plumbicon tubes.  Indeed, it was the representative of the European tradition in electronic tubes competing against the American tradition represented by the image orthicon.  The German company Heimann produced the Superikonoskop for the 1936 Berlin Olympic Games, later Heimann also produced and commercialised it from 1940 to 1955.  From 1952 to 1958 the Dutch company Philips finally produced and commercialised the image iconoscope and multicon.

U.S. television broadcasting, at the time, consisted of a variety of markets in a wide range of sizes, each competing for programming and dominance with separate technology, until deals were made and standards agreed upon in 1941.  RCA, for example, used only Iconoscopes in the New York area, but Farnsworth Image Dissectors in Philadelphia and San Francisco.  In September 1939, RCA agreed to pay the Farnsworth Television and Radio Corporation royalties over the next ten years for access to Farnsworth’s patents.  With this historic agreement in place, RCA integrated much of what was best about Farnsworth Technology into their systems.  In 1941, the United States implemented 525-line television.  Electrical engineer Benjamin Adler played a prominent role in the development of television.

The world’s first 625-line TV standard was designed in the Soviet Union in 1944 and became a national standard in 1946.  The first broadcast in 625-line standard occurred in Moscow in 1948.  The concept of 625 lines per frame was subsequently implemented in the European CCIR standard.  In 1936, Kalman Tihanyi described the principle of plasma display, the first flat panel display system.

Early electronic TV sets were large and bulky, with analogue circuits made of vacuum tubes.  Following the invention of the first working transistor at Bell Labs, Sony founder Masaru Ibuka predicted in 1952 that the transition to electronic circuits made of transistors would lead to smaller and more portable TV sets.  The first fully transistorised, portable solid-state television set was the 8-inch Sony TV8-301, developed in 1959 and released in 1960.  This began the transformation of TV viewership from a communal viewing experience to a solitary viewing experience.  By 1960, Sony had sold over 4 million portable TV sets worldwide.

Image © unknown via Wikipedia and is in the public domain

Ferdinand Braun.

Image © unknown via Wikipedia and is in the public domain

Vladimir Zworykin in 1929.

The Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Company research engineer can be seen here with Mildred Birt demonstrating electronic television.

The broadcast images are projected on a mirror on the top of the cabinet making it possible for many to watch.

Image © unknown via Wikipedia

Manfred von Ardenne in 1933. 

Image © unknown via Wikipedia and is in the public domain

A Radio Corporation Of America Advertisement.

This RCA advertisement from the Radio & Television magazine (Vol. X, No. 2, June, 1939) is for the beginning of regular experimental television broadcasting from the NBC studios to the New York metropolitan area, U.S.A.

Image © unknown via Wikipedia and is in the public domain

An Indian-head test pattern.

This 2F21 monoscope tube motif was used from 1940 until the advent of colour television.  It was displayed when a television station first signed on every day.

Colour Television 

Read more about Colour Television here

The basic idea of using three monochrome images to produce a colour image had been experimented with almost as soon as black-and-white televisions (TV) had first been built. Although he gave no practical details, among the earliest published proposals for TV was one by Maurice Le Blanc, in 1880, for a colour system, including the first mentions in TV literature of line and frame scanning.  Polish inventor Jan Szczepanik patented a colour TV system in 1897, using a selenium photoelectric cell at the transmitter and an electromagnet controlling an oscillating mirror and a moving prism at the receiver.  But his system contained no means of analyzing the spectrum of colours at the transmitting end, and could not have worked as he described it.  Another inventor, Hovannes Adamian, also experimented with colour television as early as 1907.  The first colour TV project was claimed by him, and was patented in Germany on the 31st of March, 1908, patent No. 197183, then in Britain, on the 1st of April 1908, patent No. 7219, in France (patent No. 390326) and in Russia in 1910 (patent No. 17912).

Scottish inventor John Logie Baird demonstrated the world’s first colour transmission on the 3rd of July, 1928, using scanning discs at the transmitting and receiving ends with three spirals of apertures, each spiral with filters of a different primary colour and three light sources at the receiving end, with a commutator to alternate their illumination.  Baird also made the world’s first colour broadcast on the 4th of February, 1938, sending a mechanically scanned 120-line image from Baird’s Crystal Palace studios to a projection screen at London’s Dominion Theatre.  Mechanically scanned colour television was also demonstrated by Bell Laboratories in June 1929 using three complete systems of photoelectric cells, amplifiers, glow-tubes, and colour filters, with a series of mirrors to superimpose the red, green, and blue images into one full-colour image.

The first practical hybrid system was again pioneered by John Logie Baird.  In 1940 he publicly demonstrated a colour TV combining a traditional black-and-white display with a rotating coloured disk.  This device was very deep, but was later improved with a mirror folding the light path into an entirely practical device resembling a large conventional console.  However, Baird was unhappy with the design, and, as early as 1944, had commented to a British government committee that a fully electronic device would be better.

In 1939, Hungarian engineer Peter Carl Goldmark introduced an electro-mechanical system while at CBS Broadcasting Inc. (CBS), which contained an Iconoscope sensor.  The CBS field-sequential colour system was partly mechanical, with a disc made of red, blue, and green filters spinning inside the television camera at 1,200 rpm, and a similar disc spinning in synchronisation in front of the cathode ray tube (CRT) inside the receiver set.  The system was first demonstrated to the Federal Communications Commission (FDC) on the 29th of August, 1940, and shown to the press on the 4th of September, 1940. 

CBS began experimental colour field tests using film as early as the 28th of August, 1940, and live cameras by the 12th of November, 1940. The National Broadcasting Company (NBC) (which is owned by Radio Corporation of America (RCA) made its first field test of colour TV on the 20th of February, 1941.  CBS began daily colour field tests on the 1st of June, 1941.  These colour systems were not compatible with existing black-and-white television sets, and, as no colour TV sets were available to the public at this time, viewing of the colour field tests was restricted to RCA and CBS engineers and the invited press.  The War Production Board halted the manufacture of TV and radio equipment for civilian use from the 22nd of April, 1942 to the 20th of August, 1945, limiting any opportunity to introduce colour TV to the general public.

As early as 1940, Baird had started work on a fully electronic system he called Telechrome. Early Telechrome devices used two electron guns aimed at either side of a phosphor plate.  The phosphor was patterned so the electrons from the guns only fell on one side of the patterning or the other.  Using cyan and magenta phosphors, a reasonable limited-colour image could be obtained.  He also demonstrated the same system using monochrome signals to produce a 3D image (called stereoscopic at the time).  A demonstration on the 16th of August.  1944 was the first example of a practical colour TV system.  Work on the Telechrome continued and plans were made to introduce a three-gun version for full colour.  However, Baird’s untimely death in 1946 ended the development of the Telechrome system.  Similar concepts were common through the 1940’s and 1950’s, differing primarily in the way they re-combined the colours generated by the three guns.  The Geer tube was similar to Baird’s concept but used small pyramids with the phosphors deposited on their outside faces, instead of Baird’s 3D patterning on a flat surface.  The Penetron used three layers of phosphor on top of each other and increased the power of the beam to reach the upper layers when drawing those colours.  The Chromatron used a set of focusing wires to select the coloured phosphors arranged in vertical stripes on the tube.

One of the great technical challenges of introducing colour broadcast TV was the desire to conserve bandwidth, potentially three times that of the existing black-and-white standards, and not use an excessive amount of radio spectrum.  In the United States (U.S.), after considerable research, the National Television Systems Committee (NTSC) approved an all-electronic system developed by RCA, which encoded the colour information separately from the brightness information and greatly reduced the resolution of the colour information to conserve bandwidth.  As black-and-white TV’s could receive the same transmission and display it in black-and-white, the colour system adopted is backwards compatible.  Compatible Colour, featured in RCA advertisements of the period, is mentioned in the song America, of West Side Story, 1957.  The bright image remained compatible with existing black-and-white TV sets at slightly reduced resolution, while colour TV’s could decode the extra information in the signal and produce a limited-resolution colour display.  The higher-resolution black-and-white and lower-resolution colour images combine in the brain to produce a seemingly high-resolution colour image.  The NTSC standard represented a major technical achievement.

The first colour broadcast was the first episode of the live program The Marriage on the 8th of July, 1954.  During the following ten years most network broadcasts, and nearly all local programming, continued to be in black-and-white.  It was not until the mid-1960s that colour sets started selling in large numbers, due in part to the colour transition of 1965 in which it was announced that over half of all network prime-time programming would be broadcast in colour that autumn.  The first all-color prime-time season came just one year later.  In 1972, the last holdout among daytime network programs converted to colour, resulting in the first completely all-colour network season.

Early colour sets were either floor-standing console models or tabletop versions nearly as bulky and heavy, so in practice, they remained firmly anchored in one place.  General Electric’s (GE) relatively compact and lightweight Porta-Colour set was introduced in the spring of 1966.  It used a transistor-based ultrahigh-frequency (UHF) tuner.  The first fully transistorised colour television in the United States was the Quasar TV introduced in 1967.   These developments made watching colour television a more flexible and convenient proposition.

In 1972, sales of colour sets finally surpassed sales of black-and-white sets.  Colour broadcasting in Europe was not standardized on the Phase Alternate Line (PAL) format until the 1960’s, and broadcasts did not start until 1967.  By this point, many of the technical issues in the early sets had been worked out, and the spread of colour sets in Europe was fairly rapid.  By the mid-1970’s, the only stations broadcasting in black-and-white were a few high-numbered UHF stations in small markets and a handful of low-power repeater stations in even smaller markets such as vacation spots.  By 1979, even the last of these had converted to colour and, by the early 1980’s, black and white sets had been pushed into niche markets, notably low-power uses, small portable sets, or for use as video monitor screens in lower-cost consumer equipment.  By the late 1980’s even these areas switched to colour sets.

 

Image © Kskhh via Wikipedia

A 40″ Samsung Full HD LED TV.

Image © Denelson83 via Wikipedia and is in the public domain

SMPTE colour bars.

These are used in a test pattern, sometimes when no programme material is available.

Digital Television 

Read more about Digital Television here and here.

Digital television (DTV)  is the transmission of audio and video by digitally processed and multiplexed signals, in contrast to the totally analogue and channel-separated signals used by analogue television (TV).  Due to data compression, digital TV can support more than one programme in the same channel bandwidth.  It is an innovative service that represents the most significant evolution in TV broadcast technology since colour TV emerged in the 1950’s.  Digital TV’s roots have been tied very closely to the availability of inexpensive, high-performance computers.  It was not until the 1990’s that digital TV became possible.  Digital TV was previously not practically possible due to the impractically high bandwidth requirements of uncompressed digital video, requiring around 200 Mbit/s for a standard-definition television (SDTV) signal, and over 1 Gbit/s for high-definition television (HDTV).

A digital TV service was proposed in 1986 by Nippon Telegraph and Telephone (NTT) and the Ministry of Posts and Telecommunication (MPT) in Japan, where there were plans to develop an Integrated Network System service.  However, it was not possible to practically implement such a digital TV service until the adoption of Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) video compression technology made it possible in the early 1990’s.

In the mid-1980’s, as Japanese consumer electronics firms forged ahead with the development of HDTV technology, the MUSE analogue format proposed by Japan Broadcasting Corporation (also known as NHK), a Japanese company, was seen as a pacesetter that threatened to eclipse United States (U.S.) electronics companies’ technologies.  Until June 1990, the Japanese MUSE standard, based on an analogue system, was the front-runner among the more than 23 other technical concepts under consideration.  Then, a U.S. company, General Instrument, demonstrated the possibility of a digital TV signal.  This breakthrough was of such significance that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was persuaded to delay its decision on an Associated Television (ATV) standard until a digitally-based standard could be developed.

In March 1990, when it became clear that a digital standard was possible, the FCC made a number of critical decisions.  First, the Commission declared that the new ATV standard must be more than an enhanced analogue signal, but be able to provide a genuine HDTV signal with at least twice the resolution of existing TV images.  Then, to ensure that viewers who did not wish to buy a new digital TV set could continue to receive conventional TV broadcasts, it dictated that the new ATV standard must be capable of being simulcast on different channels.  The new ATV standard also allowed the new definition television (DTV) signal to be based on entirely new design principles.  Although incompatible with the existing National Television Standards Committee (NTSC) standard, the new DTV standard would be able to incorporate many improvements.

The last standards adopted by the FCC did not require a single standard for scanning formats, aspect ratios, or lines of resolution.  This compromise resulted from a dispute between the consumer electronics industry (joined by some broadcasters) and the computer industry (joined by the film industry and some public interest groups) over which of the two scanning processes (interlaced or progressive) would be best suited for the newer digital HDTV compatible display devices.  Interlaced scanning, which had been specifically designed for older analogue cathode ray tube (CRT) display technologies, scans even-numbered lines first, then odd-numbered ones.  In fact, interlaced scanning can be looked at as the first video compression model as it was partly designed in the 1940’s to double the image resolution to exceed the limitations of the TV broadcast bandwidth.  Another reason for its adoption was to limit the flickering on early CRT screens whose phosphor-coated screens could only retain the image from the electron scanning gun for a relatively short duration.  However, interlaced scanning does not work as efficiently on newer devices such as Liquid-crystal display (LCD), for example, which are better suited to a more frequent progressive refresh rate.

Progressive scanning, the format that the computer industry had long adopted for computer display monitors, scans every line in sequence, from top to bottom.  Progressive scanning in effect doubles the amount of data generated for every full screen displayed in comparison to interlaced scanning by painting the screen in one pass in 1/60-second, instead of two passes in 1/30-second.  The computer industry argued that progressive scanning is superior because it does not flicker on the new standard of display devices in the manner of interlaced scanning.  It also argued that progressive scanning enables easier connections with the Internet, and is more cheaply converted to interlaced formats than vice versa.  The film industry also supported progressive scanning because it offered a more efficient means of converting filmed programming into digital formats.  For their part, the consumer electronics industry and broadcasters argued that interlaced scanning was the only technology that could transmit the highest quality pictures then (and currently) feasible, i.e., 1,080 lines per picture and 1,920 pixels per line.  Broadcasters also favoured interlaced scanning because their vast archive of interlaced programming is not readily compatible with a progressive format.  William F. Schreiber, who was director of the Advanced Television Research Program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology from 1983 until his retirement in 1990, thought that the continued advocacy of interlaced equipment originated from consumer electronics companies that were trying to get back the substantial investments they made in the interlaced technology.

The digital TV transition started in the late 2000’s.  All governments across the world set the deadline for analogue shutdown by 2010’s.  Initially, the adoption rate was low, as the first digital tuner-equipped TV sets were costly but soon, as the price of digital-capable TV sets dropped, more and more households were converting to digital TV sets. 

Smart Television

Read more about Smart Television here.

The advent of digital television (TV) allowed innovations like smart TV sets.  A smart television, sometimes referred to as a connected TV or hybrid TV, is a TV set or set-top box with integrated Internet and Web 2.0 features, and is an example of technological convergence between computers, television sets and set-top boxes.  Besides the traditional functions of TV sets and set-top boxes provided through traditional Broadcasting media, these devices can also provide Internet TV, online interactive media, over-the-top content, as well as on-demand streaming media, and home networking access.  These TV’s come pre-loaded with an operating system.

Smart TV is not to be confused with Internet TV, Internet Protocol television or Web TV.  Internet television refers to the receiving of television content over the Internet instead of by traditional systems such as terrestrial, cable and satellite (although the Internet itself is received by these methods).  Internet protocol television (IPTV) is one of the emerging Internet television technology standards for use by TV  networks.  Web TV is a term used for programs created by a wide variety of companies and individuals for broadcast on Internet TV.  A first patent was filed in 1994 (and extended the following year) for an intelligent TV system, linked with data processing systems, by means of a digital or analogue network.  Apart from being linked to data networks, one key point is its ability to automatically download necessary software routines, according to a user’s demand, and process their needs.  Major TV manufacturers announced the production of smart TV’s only, for middle-end and high-end TV’s in 2015.   Smart TV’s have gotten more affordable compared to when they were first introduced, with 46 million United States (U.S.) households having at least one as of 2019.

Image © LG via Wikipedia

An LG Smart TV.

3D Television 

Read more about 3D Television here.

3D television (3DTV) conveys depth perception to the viewer by employing techniques such as stereoscopic display, multi-view display, 2D-plus-depth, or any other form of 3D display.  Most modern 3D television (TV) sets use an active shutter 3D system or a polarised 3D system, and some are autostereoscopic without the need for glasses.  Stereoscopic 3D television was demonstrated for the first time on the 10th of August, 1928, by John Logie Baird in his company’s premises at 133 Long Acre, London.  Baird pioneered a variety of 3D television systems using electromechanical and cathode-ray tube (CRT) techniques.  The first 3D TV was produced in 1935.  The advent of digital TV in the 2000’s greatly improved 3D TV sets.  Although 3D TV sets are quite popular for watching 3D home media such as on Blu-ray discs, 3D programming has largely failed to make inroads with the public.  Many 3D TV channels which started in the early 2010’s were shut down by the mid-2010’s.  According to DisplaySearch 3D TV shipments totaled 41.45 million units in 2012, compared with 24.14 in 2011 and 2.26 in 2010.  As of late 2013, the number of 3D TV viewers started to decline.

Broadcast Systems

Terrestrial Television

Read more about Terrestrial Television here and here.

Programming is broadcast by television (TV) stations, sometimes called channels, as stations are licensed by their governments to broadcast only over assigned channels in the TV band.  At first, terrestrial broadcasting was the only way TV could be widely distributed, and because bandwidth was limited, i.e., there were only a small number of channels available, government regulation was the norm.  In the United States (U.S.), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) allowed stations to broadcast advertisements beginning in July 1941 but required public service programming commitments as a requirement for a license.  By contrast, the United Kingdom (U.K.) chose a different route, imposing a TV license fee on owners of TV reception equipment to fund the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) which had public service as part of its Royal Charter.

WRGB claims to be the world’s oldest TV station, tracing its roots to an experimental station founded on the 13th of January, 1928, broadcasting from the General Electric (G.E.) factory in Schenectady, New York, U.S.  under the call letters W2XB.  It was popularly known as WGY Television after its sister radio station.  Later in 1928, G.E. started a second facility, this one in New York City, which had the call letters W2XBS and which today is known as WNBC.  The two stations were experimental in nature and had no regular programming, as receivers were operated by engineers within the company.  The image of a Felix the Cat doll rotating on a turntable was broadcast for two hours every day for several years as new technology was being tested by the engineers.  On the 2nd of November 1936, the BBC began transmitting the world’s first public regular high-definition service from the Victorian Alexandra Palace in north London.   It therefore claims to be the birthplace of TV broadcasting as we now know it.

With the widespread adoption of cable across the U.S. in the 1970’s and 1980’s, terrestrial TV broadcasts have been in decline.  In 2013 it was estimated that about 7% of U.S. households used an antenna.  A slight increase in use began around 2010 due to the switchover to digital terrestrial TV broadcasts, which offered pristine image quality over very large areas and offered an alternative to cable TV (CATV) for cord-cutters.  All other countries around the world are also in the process of either shutting down analogue terrestrial TV or switching over to digital terrestrial TV.

Image © Tennen-Gas via Wikipedia

A modern high-gain UHF Yagi television antenna.

This antenna is used for UHF HDTV reception.  The antenna’s main lobe is off the right end of the antenna and it is most sensitive to stations in that direction.  Each of the metal crossbars along the antenna support boom is called an element, which acts as a half-wave dipole resonator for the radio waves.  The antenna has one driven element which is attached to the TV and it is behind the black box.  The black box is a preamplifier which increases the power of the TV signal before it is sent to the TV set.  The 17 elements to the right of the driven element are called directors.  They reinforce the signal.   The 4 elements on the V-shaped boom are called a corner reflector and they serve to reflect the signal back toward the driven element. 

Yagi HDTV antennas use a corner reflector to increase the bandwidth of the antenna.  The rest of the antenna increases the gain at higher channels, while the corner reflector increases the gain at lower channels.

Cable Television

Read more about Cable Television here and here.

Cable television (CATV) is a system of broadcasting television (TV) programming to paying subscribers via radio frequency (RF) signals transmitted through coaxial cables or light pulses through fibre-optic cables.  This contrasts with traditional terrestrial TV, in which the TV signal is transmitted over the air by radio waves and received by a television antenna attached to the TV.  In the 2000’s, frequency modulation (FM) radio programming, high-speed Internet, telephone service, and similar non-television services may also be provided through these cables.  The abbreviation CATV is used for cable television in the United States (U.S.).   It originally stood for Community Access Television or Community Antenna Television, from cable television’s origins in 1948, in areas where over-the-air reception was limited by distance from transmitters or mountainous terrain, large community antennas were constructed, and cable was run from them to individual homes.

Image © Peter Trieb via Wikipedia and is in the public domain

Coaxial cable.

This cable is used to carry cable television signals into cathode-ray tubes and flat-panel TV sets.

Satellite Television

Read more about Satellite Television here.

Satellite television is a system of supplying television (TV) programming using broadcast signals relayed from communication satellites.  The signals are received via an outdoor parabolic reflector antenna usually referred to as a satellite dish and a low-noise block downconverter.  A satellite receiver then decodes the desired TV program for viewing on a television set.  Receivers can be external set-top boxes or a built-in TV tuner.  Satellite TV provides a wide range of channels and services, especially to geographic areas without terrestrial TV or cable TV (CATV).

The most common method of reception is direct-broadcast satellite TV, also known as direct-to-home.  In  direct-broadcast satellite television  (DBSTV) systems, signals are relayed from a direct broadcast satellite on the Ku wavelength and are completely digital.  Satellite TV systems formerly used systems known as TV receive-only.  These systems received analogue signals transmitted in the C-band spectrum from fixed-satellite service (FSS) type satellites and required the use of large dishes.  Consequently, these systems were nicknamed big dish systems and were more expensive and less popular.

The direct-broadcast satellite (DBS) TV signals were earlier analogue signals and later digital signals, both of which require a compatible receiver.  Digital signals may include high-definition television (HDTV).  Some transmissions and channels are free-to-air or free-to-view, while many other channels are pay-for television requiring a subscription.  In 1945, British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke proposed a worldwide communications system which would function by means of three satellites equally spaced apart in Earth’s orbit.  This was published in the October 1945 issue of the Wireless World magazine and won him the Franklin Institute’s Stuart Ballantine Medal in 1963.

The first satellite TV signals from Europe to North America were relayed via the Telstar satellite over the Atlantic Ocean on the 23rd of July. 1962.  The signals were received and broadcast in North American and European countries and watched by over 100 million.  Launched in 1962, the Relay 1 satellite was the first satellite to transmit TV signals from the U.S. to Japan.  The first geosynchronous communication satellite, Syncom 2, was launched on the 26th of July 1963.

The world’s first commercial communications satellite, called Intelsat I nicknamed Early Bird, was launched into geosynchronous orbit on the 6th of April. 1965.  The first national network of TV satellites, called Orbita, was created by the Soviet Union in October 1967 and was based on the principle of using the highly elliptical Molniya satellite for rebroadcasting and delivering television signals to ground downlink stations.  The first commercial North American satellite to carry TV transmissions was Canada’s geostationary Anik 1, which was launched on the 9th of November, 1972.  ATS-6, the world’s first experimental educational and Direct Broadcast Satellite, was launched on the 30th of May, 1974.   It transmitted at 860 MHz using wideband frequency modulation (FM) and had two sound channels.  The transmissions were focused on the Indian subcontinent but experimenters were able to receive the signal in Western Europe using home-constructed equipment that drew on Ultra high frequency  (UHF) television design techniques already in use.

The first in a series of Soviet geostationary satellites to carry Direct-To-Home television, Ekran 1, was launched on the 26th of October, 1976.  It used a 714 MHz UHF downlink frequency so that the transmissions could be received with existing UHF television technology rather than microwave technology.

Image © Brian Katt via Wikipedia

DBS satellite dishes.

These Dishes are installed on an apartment complex in San Jose, California,  U.S.A.

Internet Television

Read more about Internet Television here.

Internet television (or online television) is the digital distribution of television (TV) content via the Internet as opposed to traditional systems like terrestrial, cable, and satellite, although the Internet itself is received by terrestrial, cable, or satellite methods.  Internet television is a general term that covers the delivery of television series, and other video content, over the Internet by video streaming technology, typically by major traditional television broadcasters.  Internet television should not be confused with Smart TV, Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) or Web TV.  Smart television refers to a television set which has a built-in operating system.  IPTV is one of the emerging Internet television technology standards for use by television networks.  Web television is a term used for programs created by a wide variety of companies and individuals for broadcast on Internet television.

Television Sets

Read more about Television Sets here.

A television set, also called a television receiver, television (TV), TV set, or telly, is a device that combines a tuner, display, amplifier, and speakers for the purpose of viewing television and hearing its audio components.  Introduced in the late 1920’s in mechanical form, television sets became a popular consumer product after World War II in electronic form, using cathode-ray tubes (CRT).  The addition of colour to broadcast television after 1953 further increased the popularity of TV sets and an outdoor antenna became a common feature of suburban homes. The ubiquitous TV set became the display device for recorded media in the 1970’s, such as Betamax and Video Home System (VHS), which enabled viewers to record TV shows and watch prerecorded movies.  In the subsequent decades, TV sets were used to watch digital versatile discs (DVD) and Blu-ray Discs of movies and other content.  Major TV manufacturers announced the discontinuation of CRT, Digital Light Processing (DLP), plasma and fluorescent-backlit liquid-crystal displays (LCD) by the mid-2010’s.  Telly’s since 2010’s mostly used light-emitting diodes (LED).  These are expected to be gradually replaced by organic light-emitting diodes (OLED) in the near future.

Image © Fletcher6 via Wikipedia

An RCA Model 630-TS Television.

The RCA 630-TS was the first mass-produced television set.  It was sold in 1946 – 1947.

Display Technologies

Read more about Display Technologies here.

Disk

Read more about Disk here.

The earliest systems employed a spinning disk to create and reproduce images.  These usually had a low resolution and screen size and never became popular with the public.

CRT

Read more about CRT here.

The cathode-ray tube (CRT) is a vacuum tube used in a television (TV) containing one or more electron guns (a source of electrons or electron emitter) and a fluorescent screen used to view images.  It has a means to accelerate and deflect electron beams onto the screen to create the images.  The images may represent electrical waveforms (oscilloscope), pictures (tv, computer monitor), radar targets or others.  The cathode ray tube (CRT) uses an evacuated glass envelope which is large, deep (i.e. long from front screen face to rear end), fairly heavy, and relatively fragile.  As a matter of safety, the face is typically made of thick lead glass so as to be highly shatter-resistant and to block most X-ray emissions, particularly if the CRT is used in a consumer product.

In television sets and computer monitors, the entire front area of the tube is scanned repetitively and systematically in a fixed pattern called a raster.  An image is produced by controlling the intensity of each of the three electron beams, one for each additive primary colour (red, green, and blue) with a video signal as a reference.  In all modern C.R.T. monitors and televisions, the beams are bent by magnetic deflection, a varying magnetic field generated by coils and driven by electronic circuits around the neck of the tube, although electrostatic deflection is commonly used in oscilloscopes, a type of diagnostic instrument.

A 14″ cathode-ray tube.

This LG.Philips cathode-ray tubes show their deflection coils and electron guns.

DLP

Image © Blue tooth7 via Wikipedia

Read more about DLP here.

Digital Light Processing (DLP) is a type of video projector technology that uses a digital micromirror device.  Some DLP’s have a television (TV) tuner, which makes them a type of TV display.  It was originally developed in 1987 by Dr. Larry Hornbeck of Texas Instruments.  While the  Digital Light Processing (DLP) imaging device was invented by Texas Instruments, the first DLP-based projector was introduced by Digital Projection Ltd in 1997.  Digital Projection and Texas Instruments were both awarded Emmy Awards in 1998 for the invention of the DLP projector technology.  DLP is used in a variety of display applications from traditional static displays to interactive displays and non-traditional embedded applications including medical, security, and industrial uses.  DLP technology is used in DLP front projectors (standalone projection units for classrooms and businesses primarily), but also in private homes.  In these cases, the image is projected onto a projection screen.  DLP is also used in DLP rear projection TV sets and digital signs.  It is also used in about 85% of digital cinema projection.

Image © Dave Pape via Wikipedia and is in the public domain

A Christie Mirage 5000 DLP projector.

This projector made by Christie is circa 2001.  It was one of four being used in the CAVE virtual reality system at EVL in Chicago, U.S.A. and was capable of 120 Hz field-sequential stereo at 1280×1024 resolution, with 5000 lumens brightness.

Plasma

Read more about Plasma here.

A plasma display panel (PDP) is a type of flat panel display common to large television (TV) displays 30 inches (76 cm) or larger.  They are called plasma displays because the technology uses small cells containing electrically charged ionised gases, or what are in essence chambers more commonly known as fluorescent lamps.

LCD

Read more about LCD here.

Liquid-crystal-display (LCD) televisions are television (TV) sets that use LCD display technology to produce images.  LCD TV’s are much thinner and lighter than cathode-ray tubes (CRT) of similar display size and are available in much larger sizes (e.g., 90-inch diagonal).  When manufacturing costs fell, this combination of features made LCD’s practical for TV receivers.  LCD’s come in two types, those using cold cathode fluorescent lamps, simply called LCD’s and those using light-emitting diodes (LED) as a backlight called LED’s.

In 2007, LCD TV sets surpassed sales of CRT-based TV sets worldwide for the first time, and their sales figures relative to other technologies accelerated.  LCD TV sets have quickly displaced the only major competitors in the large-screen market, the Plasma display panel and rear-projection TV.  In mid-2010’s LCD’s especially LED’s became, by far, the most widely produced and sold TV display type.  LCD’s also have disadvantages.  Other technologies address these weaknesses, including organic light-emitting diode (OLED), field emission display (FED) and surface-conduction electron-emitter display (SED) TV’s, but as of 2014 none of these have entered widespread production.

OLED

Read more about OLED here.

An organic light-emitting diode (OLED) is a light-emitting diode in which the emissive electroluminescent layer is a film of organic compound which emits light in response to an electric current.  This layer of organic semiconductor is situated between two electrodes.  Generally, at least one of these electrodes is transparent.  OLED’s are used to create digital displays in devices such as television (TV) screens.  It is also used for computer monitors, and portable systems such as mobile phones, handheld game consoles and personal digital assistants (PDA).

There are two main groups of OLED, those based on small molecules and those employing polymers.  Adding mobile ions to an OLED creates a light-emitting electrochemical cell (LEC), which has a slightly different mode of operation.  OLED displays can use either passive-matrix or active-matrix addressing schemes.  Active-matrix OLED’s require a thin-film transistor backplane to switch each individual pixel on or off but allow for higher resolution and larger display sizes.

An OLED display works without a backlight.  Thus, it can display deep black levels and can be thinner and lighter than a liquid crystal display (LCD).  In low ambient light conditions such as a dark room, an OLED screen can achieve a higher contrast ratio than an LCD, whether it uses cold cathode fluorescent lamps or a light-emitting diode (LED) backlight.  OLED’s are expected to replace other forms of display in the near future.

Image © LG via Wikipedia

An LG 3D OLED TV.

Display Resolution

LDTV

Read more about LDTV here.

Low-definition television (LDTV) refers to television (TV) systems that have a lower screen resolution than standard-definition TV systems such 240p (320*240).  It is used in handheld tellies.  The most common source of LDTV programming is the Internet, where mass distribution of higher-resolution video files could overwhelm computer servers and take too long to download.  Many mobile phones and portable devices such as Apple’s iPod Nano, or Sony’s PlayStation Portable use LDTV video, as higher-resolution files would be excessive to the needs of their small screens (320×240 and 480×272 pixels respectively).  The current generation of iPod Nanos has LDTV screens, as do the first three generations of iPod Touch and iPhone (480×320).  For the first years of its existence, YouTube offered only one, low-definition (LD) resolution of 320x240p at 30fps or less.  A standard, consumer-grade videotape can be considered a standard-definition television (SDTV) due to its resolution (approximately 360 × 480i/576i).

Image © Libron via Wikipedia and is in the public domain

A comparison of 8K UHDTV, 4K UHDTV, HDTV and SDTV resolution.

SDTV

Read more about SDTV here.

Standard-definition television (SDTV) refers to two different resolutions, 576i, with 576 interlaced lines of resolution, derived from the European-developed Phase Alternating Line (PAL) and Sequentiel de couleur a memoir (french for colour sequential with memory) (SECAM) systems, and 480i based on the American National Television System Committee (NTSC) system.  SDTV is a television (TV) system that uses a resolution that is not considered to be either high-definition television (HDTV) (720p, 1080i, 1080p, 1440p, 4K ultra high-definition television (UHDTV), and 8K ultra-high definition (UHD) or enhanced-definition television (EDT.V 480p).  In North America, digital SDTV is broadcast in the same 4:3 aspect ratio as National Television Standards Committee  (NTSC) signals with widescreen content being centre cut.  However, in other parts of the world that used the PAL or SECAM colour systems, SDTV is now usually shown with a 16:9 aspect ratio, with the transition occurring between the mid-1990’s and mid-2000’s.  Older programs with a 4:3 aspect ratio are shown in the United States (U.S.) as 4:3 with non-Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC) countries preferring to reduce the horizontal resolution by anamorphically scaling a pillarboxed image.

HDTV

Read more about HDTV here

High-definition television (HDTV) provides a resolution that is substantially higher than that of standard-definition television (SDTV).

HDTV may be transmitted in various formats:

1080p: 1920×1080p: 2,073,600 pixels (~2.07 megapixels) per frame.

1080i: 1920×1080i: 1,036,800 pixels (~1.04 MP) per field or 2,073,600 pixels (~2.07 MP) per frame.

A non-standard CEA resolution exists in some countries such as 1440×1080i: 777,600 pixels (~0.78 MP) per field or 1,555,200 pixels (~1.56 MP) per frame.

720p: 1280×720p: 921,600 pixels (~0.92 MP) per frame.

UHDTV

Read more about UHDTV here.

Ultra-high-definition television (UHDTV), also known as Super Hi-Vision,  UltraHD or UHD  includes 4K UHD (2160p) and 8K ultra-high definition (UHD) (4320p), which are two digital video formats proposed by NHK Science & Technology Research Laboratories and defined and approved by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). The Consumer Electronics Association (CTA) announced on the 17th of October, 2012, that UHD, or Ultra HD, would be used for displays that have an aspect ratio of at least 16:9 and at least one digital input capable of carrying and presenting natural video at a minimum resolution of 3840×2160 pixels.

Content

Television Programming

Read more about Television Programming here, here and here.

Getting television (TV) programming shown to the public can happen in many other ways.  After production, the next step is to market and deliver the product to whichever markets are open to using it.  This typically happens on two levels:

Original run or First run (a producer creates a programme of one or multiple episodes and shows it on a station or network which has either paid for the production itself or to which a license has been granted by the TV producers to do the same).

Broadcast syndication  (this is the terminology rather broadly used to describe secondary programming usages i.e. beyond its original run.  It includes secondary runs in the country of the first issue, but also international usage which may not be managed by the originating producer.  In many cases, other companies, TV stations, or individuals are engaged to do the syndication work, in other words, to sell the product into the markets they are allowed to sell into by contract from the copyright holders, in most cases the producers).

First-run programming is increasing on subscription services outside of the United States (U.S.), but few domestically produced programs are syndicated on domestic free-to-air (FTA) elsewhere.  This practice is increasing, however, generally on digital-only FTA channels or with subscriber-only, first-run material appearing on FTA.  Unlike the U.S., repeat FTA screenings of an FTA network program usually only occur on that network.  Also, affiliates rarely buy or produce non-network programming that is not focused on local programming.

Television Genres

Television (TV)  genres include a broad range of programming types that entertain, inform, and educate viewers.  The most expensive entertainment genres to produce are usually dramas and dramatic miniseries.  However, other genres, such as historical Western genres, may also have high production costs.

Pop culture entertainment genres include action-oriented shows such as police, crime, detective dramas, horror, or thriller shows.  As well, there are also other variants of the drama genre, such as medical dramas and daytime soap operas.  Sci-fi series can fall into either the drama or action category, depending on whether they emphasise philosophical questions or high adventure.  Comedy is a popular genre which includes situation comedy (sitcom) and animated series for the adult demographic such as Comedy Central’s South Park.

The least expensive forms of entertainment programming genres are game shows, talk shows, variety shows, and reality TV.  Game shows feature contestants answering questions and solving puzzles to win prizes.  Talk shows contain interviews with film, TV, music and sports celebrities and public figures.  Variety shows feature a range of musical performers and other entertainers, such as comedians and magicians, introduced by a host or Master of Ceremonies.  There is some crossover between some talk shows and variety shows because leading talk shows often feature performances by bands, singers, comedians, and other performers in between the interview segments.  Reality TV series regular people (i.e., not actors) facing unusual challenges or experiences ranging from arrest by police officers to significant weight loss.  A derived version of reality shows depicts celebrities doing mundane activities such as going about their everyday life or doing regular jobs. 

Fictional TV programmes that some telly scholars and broadcasting advocacy groups argue are quality TV programmes include series such as The Sopranos.  Kristin Thompson argues that some of these television series exhibit traits also found in art films, such as psychological realism, narrative complexity, and ambiguous plot lines.  Nonfiction TV programmes that some telly scholars and broadcasting advocacy groups argue are quality television programmes, include a range of serious, noncommercial, programming aimed at a niche audience, such as documentaries and public affairs shows. 

Television Funding

Around the world, broadcast television (TV) is financed by government, advertising, licensing (a form of tax), subscription, or any combination of these.  To protect revenues, subscription TV channels are usually encrypted to ensure that only subscribers receive the decryption codes to see the signal.  Unencrypted channels are known as free-to-air (FTA).  In 2009, the global TV market represented 1,217.2 million TV households with at least one TV and total revenues of 268.9 billion EUR (declining 1.2% compared to 2008).  North America had the biggest TV revenue market share with 39% followed by Europe (31%), Asia-Pacific (21%), Latin America (8%), and Africa and the Middle East (2%).  Globally, the different TV revenue sources are divided into 45–50% TV advertising revenues, 40–45% subscription fees and 10% public funding.

Television Advertising

Read more about Television advertising here

Television’s broad reach makes it a powerful and attractive medium for advertisers. Many television (TV) networks and stations sell blocks of broadcast time to advertisers (sponsors) to fund their programming.  Television advertisements (also called a TV commercial, commercial, ad and an advert) is a span of TV programming produced and paid for by an organisation, which conveys a message, typically to market a product or service.  Advertising revenue provides a significant portion of the funding for most privately owned TV networks.  The vast majority of TV ads today consist of brief advertising spots, ranging in length from a few seconds to several minutes (as well as programme-length infomercials).  Adverts of this sort have been used to promote a wide variety of goods, services and ideas since the beginning of TV.

The effects of TV advertising upon the viewing public (and the effects of mass media in general) have been the subject of discourse by philosophers including Marshall McLuhan.  The viewership of TV programming, as measured by companies such as Nielsen Media Research, is often used as a metric for TV  advertisement placement, and consequently, for the rates charged to advertisers to air within a given network, television programme, or time of day (called a daypart).  In many countries, including the United States (U.S.), TV campaign advertisements are considered indispensable for a political campaign.  In other countries, such as France, political advertising on the telly is heavily restricted, while some countries, such as Norway, completely ban political adverts.

The first official, paid television ad was broadcast in the U.S. on the 1st of July, 1941, over New York station WNBT (now WNBC) before a baseball game between the Brooklyn Dodgers and Philadelphia Phillies.  The announcement for Bulova watches, for which the company paid anywhere from $4.00 to $9.00 (reports vary), displayed a WNBT test pattern modified to look like a clock with the hands showing the time.  The Bulova logo, with the phrase Bulova Watch Time, was shown in the lower right-hand quadrant of the test pattern while the second hand swept around the dial for one minute.  The first TV ad broadcast in the United Kingdom (U.K.) was on ITV on the 22nd of September, 1955, advertising Gibbs SR toothpaste.  The first TV ad broadcast in Asia was on Nippon Television in Tokyo on the 28th of August, 1953, advertising Seikosha (now Seiko), which also displayed a clock with the current time.

Image via Swtpc6800 on Wikipedia and is in the public domain

Radio News cover, September, 1928.

Television was still in its experimental phase in 1928, but the medium’s potential to sell goods was already predicted.  It was seen as the ideal television of the future but these early experimental televisions could not maintain synchronisation with the camera.  The viewer had to constantly make adjustments as seen by the sync control in the man’s hand.  

United Kingdom

The television (TV) regulator oversees TV advertising in the United Kingdom (U.K.).  Its restrictions have applied since the early days of commercially funded TV.  Despite this, an early TV mogul, Roy Thomson, likened the broadcasting licence to being a licence to print money.  Restrictions mean that the big three national commercial TV channels ITV, Channel 4, and Channel 5 can show an average of only seven minutes of advertising per hour (eight minutes in the peak period).  Other broadcasters must average no more than nine minutes (twelve in the peak).  This means that many imported TV shows from the United States (U.S.) have unnatural pauses where a British company does not use the narrative breaks intended for more frequent U.S. advertising.  Advertisements must not be inserted in the course of certain specific proscribed types of programmes which last less than half an hour in scheduled duration.  This list includes any news or current affairs programmes, documentaries, and programmes for children.  Additionally, ads may not be carried in a programme designed and broadcast for reception in schools in any religious broadcasting service or other devotional program or during a formal Royal ceremony or occasion.  There also must be clear demarcations in time between the programmes and the adverts.  The British Broadcasting Company (BBC), being strictly non-commercial, is not allowed to show advertisements on TV in the U.K., although it has many advertising-funded channels abroad.  The majority of its budget comes from TV license fees and broadcast syndication, the sale of content to other broadcasters.

United States

Since its inception in the United States (U.S.) in 1941, television (TV) commercials have become one of the most effective, persuasive, and popular methods of selling products of many sorts, especially consumer goods.  During the 1940’s and into the 1950’s, programmes were hosted by single advertisers.  This, in turn, gave great creative control to the advertisers over the content of the show.  Perhaps due to the quiz show scandals in the 1950’s, networks shifted to the magazine concept, introducing advertising breaks with other advertisers.

U.S. advertising rates are determined primarily by Nielsen ratings.  The time of the day and popularity of the channel determine how much a TV commercial can cost.  For example, it can cost approximately $750,000 for a 30-second block of commercial time during the highly popular singing competition American Idol, while the same amount of time for the Super Bowl can cost several million dollars. Conversely, lesser-viewed time slots, such as early mornings and weekday afternoons, are often sold in bulk to producers of infomercials at far lower rates.  In recent years, the paid programme or infomercial has become common, usually in lengths of 30 minutes or one hour.  Some drug companies and other businesses have even created news items for broadcast, known in the industry as video news releases, paying programme directors to use them.

Some TV programmes also deliberately place products into their shows as advertisements, a practice started in feature films and is known as product placement.  For example, a character could be drinking a certain kind of pop, going to a particular chain restaurant, or driving a certain make of car.  This is sometimes very subtle, with shows having vehicles provided by manufacturers for low cost in exchange for product placement.  Sometimes, a specific brand or trade mark, or music from a certain artist or group, is used.   This excludes guest appearances by artists who perform on the show.

Ireland

Broadcast advertising is regulated by the Broadcasting Authority of Ireland.

Subscription 

Some television (TV) channels are partly funded from subscriptions, therefore, the signals are encrypted during the broadcast to ensure that only the paying subscribers have access to the decryption codes to watch pay television or speciality channels.  Most subscription services are also funded by advertising.

Taxation Or License

Television (TV) services in some countries may be funded by a TV licence or a form of taxation, which means that advertising plays a lesser role or no role at all.  For example, some channels may carry no advertising at all and some very little, including:

Australia (ABC Television).

Belgium (VRT for Flanders and RTBF for Wallonia).

Denmark (DR).

Ireland (RTE).

Japan (NHK).

Norway (NRK).

Sweden (SVT).

Switzerland (SRG SSR).

Republic of China (Taiwan) (PTS).

United Kingdom (BBC).

United States (PBS).

Broadcast Programming

Read more about Broadcast Programming here and here.

Broadcast programming, or television (TV) listings in the United Kingdom (U.K.), is the practice of organising TV programmes in a schedule, with broadcast automation used to regularly change the scheduling of TV programmes to build an audience for a new show, retain that audience, or compete with other broadcasters’ programmes.

See Also

Blog Posts

Notes And Links

Article source: Wikipedia and is subject to change.

Max Rahubovskiy on Pexels –  The image shown at the top of this page is the copyright of Max Rahubovskiy.  You can find more great work from the photographer Max by clicking the link above and you can get lots more free stock photos at Pexels.

The image above of Flat-screen televisions in 2008 is the copyright of Wikipedia user Wags05.  It is in the Public Domain. 

The image above of the Nipkow Disk is the copyright of Wikipedia user Hzeller.   It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 3.0).  

The image above of John Ferdinand Braun is copyright unknown and is in the Public Domain.

The image above of Vladimir Zworykin is copyright unknown and is in the Public Domain.

The image above of Manfred von Ardenne in 1933 is the copyright of unknown.   It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 3.0).  

The image above of A Radio Corporation Of America 1939 Advertisement is copyright unknown and is in the Public Domain.

The image above of A 40″ Samsung Full HD LED TV is the copyright of Wikipedia user Kskhh.   It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 4.0).  

The image above of SMPTE colour bars is the copyright of Wikipedia user Denelson83.  It is in the Public Domain. You can see more of his/her great work here.

The image above of an LG Smart TV is the copyright of Wikipedia user LG.  It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 2.0).  You can see more of their great work here.

The image above of A modern high-gain UHF Yagi television antenna is the copyright of Wikipedia user Tennen-Gas.   It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 3.0).  

The image above of Coaxial cable is the copyright of Wikipedia user Peter Trieb.  It is in the Public Domain. 

The image above of DBS satellite dishes is the copyright of Wikipedia user Brian Katt.   It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 3.0).  You see more of his great work here.

The image above of an RCA Model 630-TS television is the copyright of Wikipedia user Fletcher6.   It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 3.0).  You see more of his/her work here.

The image above of a 14″ cathode-ray tube is the copyright of Wikipedia user Blue tooth7.   It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 3.0)

The image above of a Christie Mirage 5000 DLP projector is the copyright of Wikipedia user Dave Pape.  It is in the Public Domain. You can see more of his great work here.

The image above of an LG 3D OLED TV is the copyright of Wikipedia user LG.  It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 2.0).  You can see more of their great work here.

The image above of a comparison of 8K UHDTV, 4K UHDTV, HDTV and SDTV resolution is the copyright of Wikipedia user Libron.  It is in the Public Domain.   

The image above of the Radio News cover, September, 1928 is provided by Wikipedia user Swtpc6800 and is in the Public Domain.

Birmingham: The Old Crown In Digbeth Photos (Part 2)

On Monday the 11th of September, 2023,  I visited the Old Crown in High Street, Digbeth, Birmingham, for the first time in my life, as part of Birmingham Heritage Week.  

Being a Brummie, born and bred, I have passed this pub a lot of times, especially as I got older and I always wondered what it would be like inside.  Although as an adult I could have popped in at any time I never got around to it until now.   I am pleased I saw, as part of Heritage Week, that this Medieval pub was presenting an exhibition on the 655-year history of Birmingham’s oldest pub.  It included never-before-seen photos and illustrations of the Grade-II* listed venue, as well as giving away a booklet by Carl Chinn.

I couldn’t really look around and appreciate how historic it is as much as I would have liked and take better shots inside of the old features because it was packed (and noisy) but I managed to take some decent enough photos to share.  Sadly, and bloody annoyingly, 19 photos didn’t turn out at all.   It had been a long day for me, coming from Edgbaston after doing a lot of walking around Cannon Hill Park (also another Heritage Week event) and it was a very hot day so my phone was heating up, on charge and playing up by now so that would explain that mystery.  It is just my usual bad luck but that’s a subject for another day!

I would have liked to have taken better ones outside too but there are seemingly never-ending roadworks going on and fences everywhere so the options to take decent photos, including crossing to the other side which is completely blocked off, makes it all very restricting indeed.

As someone who battles mental health problems daily, it wasn’t easy being there on my own and my anxiety was very high but it is a nice pub to go to and I am glad I went.  I hope to take some better photos one day, however, at £5.50 for a pint of lager shandy, I won’t be going there that often!

The Old Crown In Digbeth Photos (Part 2)

Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker

The interior of The Old Crown in Digbeth. Taken on 09/09/23.

Image © Frank Parker

The Old Crown well in The Old Crown in Digbeth.  Taken on 09/09/23.

Image © Frank Parker

The History of The Old Crown sign in The Old Crown in Digbeth.  Taken on 09/09/23.

Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker

History of The Old Crown in Digbeth.  Taken on 09/09/23.

Blog Posts

Notes And Links

Birmingham: The Old Crown In Digbeth Photos (Part 1)

Image © Frank Parker

On Monday the 11th of September, 2023,  I visited the Old Crown in High Street, Digbeth, Birmingham, for the first time in my life, as part of Birmingham Heritage Week.  

Being a Brummie, born and bred, I have passed this pub a lot of times, especially as I got older and I always wondered what it would be like inside.  Although as an adult I could have popped in at any time I never got around to it until now.   I am pleased I saw, as part of Heritage Week, that this Medieval pub was presenting an exhibition on the 655-year history of Birmingham’s oldest pub.  It included never-before-seen photos and illustrations of the Grade-II* listed venue, as well as giving away a booklet by Carl Chinn.

I couldn’t really look around and appreciate how historic it is as much as I would have liked and take better shots inside of the old features because it was packed (and noisy) but I managed to take some decent enough photos to share.  Sadly, and bloody annoyingly, 19 photos didn’t turn out at all.   It had been a long day for me, coming from Edgbaston after doing a lot of walking around Cannon Hill Park (also another Heritage Week event) and it was a very hot day so my phone was heating up, on charge and playing up by now so that would explain that mystery.  It is just my usual bad luck but that’s a subject for another day!

I would have liked to have taken better ones outside too but there are seemingly never-ending roadworks going on and fences everywhere so the options to take decent photos, including crossing to the other side which is completely blocked off, makes it all very restricting indeed.

As someone who battles mental health problems daily, it wasn’t easy being there on my own and my anxiety was very high but it is a nice pub to go to and I am glad I went.  I hope to take some better photos one day, however, at £5.50 for a pint of lager shandy, I won’t be going there that often!

The Old Crown In Digbeth Photos (Part 1)

Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Looking towards the side of The Old Crown in Digbeth. Taken on 09/09/23.
Image © Frank Parker

Looking towards The Old Crown in Digbeth. Taken on 09/09/23.

Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker

The Old Crown in Digbeth. Taken on 09/09/23.

Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker

Looking towards the side of The Old Crown in Digbeth. Taken on 09/09/23. 

Image © Frank Parker

The Old Crown sign at The Old Crown in Digbeth. Taken on 09/09/23.

Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker

The interior of The Old Crown in Digbeth. Taken on 09/09/23. 

Blog Posts

Notes And Links

 

Birmingham: The Old Crown In Digbeth

Image © Frank Parker

On Monday the 11th of September, 2023,  I visited the Old Crown in High Street, Digbeth, Birmingham, for the first time in my life, as part of Birmingham Heritage Week.  The pub was celebrating its 165th birthday over the weekend.

Being a Brummie, born and bred, I have passed this pub a lot of times, especially as I got older and I always wondered what it would be like inside.  Although as an adult I could have popped in at any time I never got around to it until now.   I am pleased I saw, as part of Heritage Week, that this Medieval pub was presenting an exhibition on the 655-year history of Birmingham’s oldest pub.  It included never-before-seen photos and illustrations of the Grade-II* listed venue, as well as giving away a booklet by Carl Chinn. 

I couldn’t really look around and appreciate how historic it is as much as I would have liked and take better shots inside of the old features because it was packed (and noisy) but I managed to take some decent enough photos to share.  Sadly, and bloody annoyingly, 19 photos didn’t turn out at all.   It had been a long day for me, coming from Edgbaston after doing a lot of walking around Cannon Hill Park (also another Heritage Week event) and it was a very hot day so my phone was heating up, on charge and playing up by now so that would explain that mystery.  It is just my usual bad luck but that’s a subject for another day!

I would have liked to have taken better ones outside too but there are seemingly never-ending roadworks going on and fences everywhere so the options to take decent photos, including crossing to the other side which is completely blocked off, makes it all very restricting indeed.

As someone who battles mental health problems daily, it wasn’t easy being there on my own and my anxiety was very high but it is a nice pub to go to and I am glad I went.  I hope to take some better photos one day, however, at £5.50 for a pint of lager shandy, I won’t be going there that often!

 

Photos Of The Old Crown, Digbeth

Click here to see photographic memories of my time there.

About The Old Crown, Digbeth

The Old Crown pub is in Deritend and is a Grade II* listed building retaining its black and white timber frame.  Almost all of the present building dates from the early 16th century. 

The Old Crown is Birmingham’s oldest secular building and has existed since 1368. 

It is Birmingham’s oldest inn with Queen Elizabeth I staying here in 1575 on her way home from Kenilworth Castle. 

Rooms are individually decorated with a mix of en-suite and shared bathrooms.  Facilities include TV, tea and coffee, towels and free wifi.   

The pub has a restaurant and there are various local eateries a short walk away and award-winning purveyors of street food, Digbeth Dining Club, takes place just two minutes away.  The Old Crown is situated a 10-minute walk from the city centre and has many local attractions within easy reach.

Having stood the test of time during the English Civil War the pub & events garden now stands proud in the heart of Digbeth, Birmingham’s thriving creative quarter.

History Of The Old Crown

It is believed the building was constructed between 1450 and 1500 with some evidence dating to 1492 (the same year the Saracen’s Head in nearby Kings Norton was completed).  John Leland visited the town during his tours of England and Wales upon entering Birmingham, in 1538 noted the building, as a “mansion house of tymber”.   It is thought to have been originally built as the Guildhall and School of St. John, Deritend.  This Guild owned a number of other buildings throughout Warwickshire, including the Guildhall in Henley in Arden.  The building was purchased in 1589, by John Dyckson, alias Bayleys who, in the 1580’s, had been buying a number of properties and lands in Deritend and in Bordesley.

Described as a tenement and garden, running alongside Heath Mill Lane, the building remained in the Dixon alias Baylis (later Dixon) family for the next hundred years.

In the original deed, John Dyckson is described as a Caryer, which in the West Midlands at this time, when roads were nothing more than hollow-ways and bridle paths, implied that he owned several trains of pack-horses.  These would have needed stabling, and Dixon would have needed warehouse space to store goods awaiting dispatch and arrived goods awaiting collection.  Such facilities would be useful to other travellers, and it may well be that the use of the house as an Inn, dates from this time.  Indeed, since England was in the grip of a patriotic pother over the failed Armada the previous year, it would have been opportune to adopt the name The Crown.  However, the earliest documentary evidence of the building’s use as an Inn is from 1626.  In a marriage settlement dated the 21st of December, 1666 it was noted by the sign of the Crowne

Heated skirmishes were fought around the building when Prince Rupert’s forces raided Birmingham during the English Civil War.

The building was converted into two houses in 1684 and then converted into three houses in 1693.  It remained three houses until the 19th century.   In 1851, Joshua Toulmin Smith saved the Old Crown from demolition when the Corporation proposed demolishing the building in order to improve the street.   Again in 1856 and 1862, the Corporation proposed to demolish the building and Smith saved the building each time.

In 1991 a local pub company owned by the Brennan family bought the Old Crown.  In the summer of 1994, Pat Brennan and his youngest son, Peter, were doing repairs and clearing out the old sheds to the rear of the property when they found the old well, which had been closed off for more than 100 years.  Now restored, it is situated at the rear entrance of the pub.   At the end of May 1998, under the guidance of Pat and Ellen Brennan and their sons Patrick, Gary and Peter, after the family’s £2 million investment into Birmingham’s most famous hostelry, The Old Crown was restored to its former glory and reopened.

Image © Frank Parker

The History of The Old Crown sign inside the pub.

Image © Frank Parker

Looking towards The Old Crown, Digbeth, Birmingham.  Taken on 09/09/23.

Image © Oosoom via Wikipedia

The Old Crown in 2006.

Construction Of The Old Crown

The building is 71 feet, 4 inches (21.74 meters) wide and 20 feet, 2 inches (6.15 meters) deep on the ground floor.  On the first floor, which overhangs the front, it is 21 feet, 9 inches (6.63 meters) deep.   When built, the original building had a central hall with a length of 40 feet (12 meters) and a width of 20 feet (6 meters).  Below this were a number of arched cellars. On the upper floor were just four rooms.  The building had a courtyard to its rear which contained a well.  It was 26 feet (8 meters) deep and surrounded by large stones.  The well was excavated and deepened to produce a total depth of 38 feet (12 meters).  The new section of the well was lined with square bricks.  At the top, it was 2 feet 7 inches, (787.4 millimetres) at its narrowest diameter and 2 feet, 9 in (838.2 millimetres) at its widest diameter.  It widened to around 4 feet (1.2 meters) at the bottom.  The well was cleaned in 1863 and Smith added an iron gate to the top of it to preserve it whilst keeping it accessible.

Image © Frank Parker

The Old Crown well.  Taken on 09/09/23.

Read more about The Old Crown here.

The above article is
sourced from The Old Crown website in the About The Old Crown section.  The rest is from  Wikipedia and is subject to change. 

Opening Times

Monday to Thursday: 12:00 p.m. to 23:30 p.m.

Food service until 9:00 p.m.

Friday to Saturday: 12:00 p.m. to 0:30 a.m.

Food service until 9:00 p.m.

Sunday: 12:00 p.m. to 23:00 p.m.

Food service until 5:45 p.m.

Bookings

The Old Crown, winner of the Best Traditional Pub at the 2019 Midland Food and Drink Hospitality Awards, has 10 bedrooms and 1 apartment available to book. 

Bookings are not compulsory but highly recommended, especially for weekends, due to how busy they are.  They always hold some space for walk-ins, so please feel free to come down even if your preferred date is full, and they will do their best to seat you.

Some dates will show as unavailable in their booking calendar due to events that are yet to be released.  

Although they do not have on-site parking, there are a number of local car parks (2 located on the High Street, visible from the hotel), feel free to enquire with them for more details or directions.

To book a room or send them an enquiry via e-mail click here.

Sign up for their newsletter and be the first to find out about these events when they are announced.

Address

High St

Deritend

Birmingham

B12 0LD

Telephone

0121 248 1368.

E-Mail

Blog Posts

Links

Images on this page of The Old Crown are the copyright of Frank Parker unless otherwise stated.

The image above of The Old Crown in 2006 is the copyright of Wikipedia user Oosoom.   It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 3.0). 

The Old Crown – Official website.

The Old Crown on Facebook.

The Old Crown on Twitter.

The Old Crown on Instagram.

The Old Crown on YouTube.

Creative Commons – Official website.  They offer better sharing, advancing universal access to knowledge and culture, and fostering creativity, innovation, and collaboration. 

 

Films

Image © of Bence Szemerey via Pixabay

Everyone loves watching a good film albeit at the cinema or at home on the television etc.  With a collection of over 1000 DVDs that includes a LOT of films, it is clear to see that this is another big passion of mine.

I can’t remember the very first film I went to see at the pictures but it was in the mid-1970’s and it possibly could have been the Disney animation adaptation of Robin Hood.  Visits to the cinema over the decades as a child and older, with family have always held special memories for me. 

Watching a film on the telly is always good but nothing beats the experience and sound quality of watching it on the big screen.  Having a home cinema has always been a dream of mine but that probably won’t ever happen but one day I would like to get a decent surround sound system and projector with a large screen or a large telly to watch films on.  I will say never say never on that one!

I like most film genres with my favourite being Horror and Science Fiction ones.  I have favourite actors and actresses the same as anyone else does and they will be shown on this page.  I am not going to list every film I have watched in my lifetime, that would be IMPOSSIBLE to remember but I will list films I have watched and enjoyed that I think are worth watching for someone else but of course, your opinions may differ from mine, that’s life.

About Film

A film, also called a movie, motion picture, moving picture, picture, photoplay, or flick is a work of visual art that simulates experiences and otherwise communicates ideas, stories, perceptions, feelings, beauty, or atmosphere through the use of moving images. Flick is, in general, a slang term, first recorded in 1926.  It originates in the verb flicker, owing to the flickering appearance of early films.  These images are generally accompanied by sound and, more rarely, other sensory stimulations.   The word cinema, short for cinematography, is often used to refer to filmmaking and the film industry, and the art form that is the result of it. 

The History Of Film

Precursors

The art of film has drawn on several earlier traditions in fields such as oral storytelling, literature, theatre, and visual arts.  Forms of art and entertainment that have already featured moving or projected images include shadowgraphy (probably used since prehistoric times), camera obscura (a natural phenomenon that has possibly been used as an artistic aid since prehistoric times), shadow puppetry (possibly originated around 200 BCE in Central Asia, India, Indonesia or China) and the magic lantern (developed in the 1650’s,  this multi-media phantasmagoria shows that magic lanterns were popular from 1790 throughout the first half of the 19th century and could feature mechanical slides, rear projection, mobile projectors, superimposition, dissolving views, live actors, smoke that was sometimes used to project images upon, odours, sounds, and even electric shocks).

Before Celluloid

The stroboscopic animation principle was introduced in 1833 with the stroboscopic disc (better known as the phenakisticope) and later applied in the zoetrope (since 1866), the flip book (since 1868), and the praxinoscope (since 1877) before it became the basic principle for cinematography.

Image © of Simon Ritter von Stampfer via Wikipedia

Prof. Stampfer’s Stroboscopische Scheibe No. X., created on the 22nd of June, 1833.  This is side Nr. 10 of the reworked second series of Stampfer’s stroboscopic disc published by Trentsensky & Vieweg in the same year.

Experiments with early phenakisticope-based animation projectors were made at least as early as 1843 and publicly screened in 1847.  Jules Duboscq marketed phenakisticope projection systems in France from circa 1853 until the 1890’s.

Photography was introduced in 1839, but initially, photographic emulsions needed such long exposures that the recording of moving subjects seemed impossible.  At least as early as 1844, a photographic series of subjects posed in different positions was created to either suggest a motion sequence or document a range of different viewing angles.  The advent of stereoscopic photography, with early experiments in the 1840’s and commercial success since the early 1850’s, raised interest in completing the photographic medium with the addition of means to capture colour and motion.  In 1849, Joseph Plateau published the idea to combine his invention of the phenakisticope with the stereoscope, as suggested to him by stereoscope inventor Charles Wheatstone, and to use photographs of plaster sculptures in different positions to be animated in the combined device.  In 1852, Jules Duboscq patented such an instrument as the Stereoscope-fantascope, ou Bioscope, but he only marketed it very briefly, without success.  One Bioscope disc with stereoscopic photographs of a machine is in the Plateau collection of Ghent University, but no instruments or other discs have yet been found.

By the late 1850’s the first examples of instantaneous photography came about and provided hope that motion photography would soon be possible, but it took a few decades before it was successfully combined with a method to record a series of sequential images in real-time.  In 1878, Eadweard Muybridge eventually managed to take a series of photographs of a running horse with a battery of cameras in a line along the track and published the results as The Horse in Motion on cabinet cards.  Muybridge, as well as Etienne-Jules Marey, Ottomar Anschütz, and many others, would create many more chronophotography studies.  Muybridge had the contours of dozens of his chronophotographic series traced onto glass discs and projected them with his zoopraxiscope in his lectures from 1880 to 1895.

Image © of Eadweard Muybridge via Wikipedia

An animation of the retouched Sallie Garner card from The Horse in Motion series by Eadweard Muybridge.  The series was from 1878 – 1879. 

Anschutz made his first instantaneous photographs in 1881.  He developed a portable camera that allowed shutter speeds as short as 1/1000 of a second in 1882.  The quality of his pictures was generally regarded to be much higher than that of the chronophotography works of Muybridge and Etienne-Jules Marey.  In 1886, Anschutz developed the Electrotachyscope, an early device that displayed short motion picture loops with 24 glass plate photographs on a 1.5-meter-wide rotating wheel that was hand-cranked to the speed of circa 30 frames per second.  Different versions were shown at many international exhibitions, fairs, conventions, and arcades from 1887 until at least 1894.  Starting in 1891, some 152 examples of a coin-operated peep-box Electrotachyscope model were manufactured by Siemens & Halske in Berlin and sold internationally.  Nearly 34,000 people paid to see it at the Berlin Exhibition Park in the summer of 1892.  Others saw it in London or at the 1893 Chicago World’s Fair.  On the 25th of November 1894, Anschutz introduced an Electrotachyscope projector with a 6 x 8 meter screening in Berlin.  Between the 22nd of February and the 30th of March 1895, a total of circa 7,000 paying customers came to view a 1.5-hour show of some 40 scenes at a 300-seat hall in the old Reichstag building in Berlin.

Image © unknown via Wikipedia

A picture of Ottomar’s Anschutz’s electrotachyscope, first published in Scientific American on the 16th of November, 1889.

Emile Reynaud already mentioned the possibility of projecting the images of the Praxinoscope in his 1877 patent application.  He presented a praxinoscope projection device at the Societe Francaise de Photographie on the 4th of June 1880 but did not market his praxinoscope before 1882.  He then further developed the device into the Theatre Optique which could project longer sequences with separate backgrounds, patented in 1888.  He created several movies for the machine by painting images on hundreds of gelatin plates that were mounted into cardboard frames and attached to a cloth band.  From the 28th of October 1892 to March 1900 Reynaud gave over 12,800 shows to a total of over 500,000 visitors at the Grevin Museu in Paris.

First Motion Pictures

By the end of the 1880’s, the introduction of lengths of celluloid photographic film and the invention of motion picture cameras, which could photograph a rapid sequence of images using only one lens, allowed the action to be captured and stored on a single compact reel of film.

Movies were initially shown publicly to one person at a time through peep show devices such as the Electrotachyscope, Kinetoscope, and the Mutoscope.  Not much later, exhibitors managed to project films on large screens for theatre audiences.

The first public screenings of films at which admission was charged were made in 1895 by the American Woodville Latham and his sons, using films produced by their Eidoloscope company, by the Skladanowsky brothers, and by the arguably better known  French brothers Auguste and Louis Lumiere with ten of their own productions.  Private screenings had preceded these by several months, with Latham’s slightly predating the others.

Roundhay Garden Scene is a short silent motion picture filmed by French inventor Louis Le Prince at Oakwood Grange in Roundhay, Leeds, in northern England on the 14th of October 1888.

Pauvre Pierrot or Poor Pete as it is known in English is a French short animated film directed by Charles-Emile Reynaud in 1891 and was released in 1892. 

Georges Melies’ Le Voyage dans la Lune or A Trip to the Moon as it is known in English is an early narrative film and also an early science fiction film, released in 1902.

The Bond is a two-reel propaganda film created by Charlie Chaplin at his own expense for the Liberty Loan Committee to help sell U.S. Liberty Bonds during World War I, released in 1918. 

Early Evolution

The earliest films were simply one static shot that showed an event or action with no editing or other cinematic techniques.  Typical films showed employees leaving a factory gate, people walking in the street, and the view from the front of a trolley as it traveled a city’s Main Street.  According to legend, when a film showed a locomotive at high speed approaching the audience, the audience panicked and ran from the theater.  Around the turn of the 20th century, films started stringing several scenes together to tell a story.  The filmmakers who first put several shots or scenes discovered that, when one shot follows another, that act establishes a relationship between the content in the separate shots in the minds of the viewer.  It is this relationship that makes all film storytelling possible.  In a simple example, if a person is shown looking out a window, whatever the next shot shows, it will be regarded as the view the person was seeing.  Each scene was a single stationary shot with the action occurring before it.  The scenes were later broken up into multiple shots photographed from different distances and angles.  Other techniques such as camera movement were developed as effective ways to tell a story with film.  Until sound film became commercially practical in the late 1920’s, motion pictures were purely visual art, but these innovative silent films had gained a hold on the public imagination.  Rather than leave audiences with only the noise of the projector as an accompaniment, theater owners hired a pianist or organist or, in large urban theaters, a full orchestra to play music that fit the mood of the film at any given moment. By the early 1920’s, most films came with a prepared list of sheet music to be used for this purpose, and complete film scores were composed for major productions.

The rise of European cinema was interrupted by the outbreak of World War I, while the film industry in the United States flourished with the rise of Hollywood, typified most prominently by the innovative work of D. W. Griffith in The Birth of a Nation (1915) and Intolerance (1916).  However, in the 1920’s, European filmmakers such as Eisenstein, F. W. Murnau, and Fritz Lang, in many ways inspired by the meteoric wartime progress of film through Griffith, along with the contributions of Charles Chaplin, Buster Keaton, and others, quickly caught up with American film-making and continued to further advance the medium.

Sound

In the 1920’s, the development of electronic sound recording technologies made it practical to incorporate a soundtrack of speech, music, and sound effects synchronized with the action on the screen.  The resulting sound films were initially distinguished from the usual silent moving pictures or movies by calling them talking pictures or talkies.  The revolution they wrought was swift.  By 1930, silent film was practically extinct in the US and already being referred to as the old medium.

The evolution of sound in cinema began with the idea of combining moving images with existing phonograph sound technology.  Early sound-film systems, such as Thomas Edison’s Kinetoscope and the Vitaphone used by Warner Bros., laid the groundwork for synchronized sound in film.  The Vitaphone system, produced alongside Bell Telephone Company and Western Electric, faced initial resistance due to expensive equipping costs, but sound in cinema gained acceptance with movies like Don Juan (1926) and The Jazz Singer (1927).

American film studios, while Europe standardized on Tobis-Klangfilm and Tri-Ergon systems.  This new technology allowed for greater fluidity in film, giving rise to more complex and epic movies like King Kong (1933).

As the television threat emerged in the 1940’s and 1950’s, the film industry needed to innovate to attract audiences.  In terms of sound technology, this meant the development of surround sound and more sophisticated audio systems, such as Cinerama’s seven-channel system.  However, these advances required a large number of personnel to operate the equipment and maintain the sound experience in cinemas.

In 1966, Dolby Laboratories introduced the Dolby A noise reduction system, which became a standard in the recording industry and eliminated the hissing sound associated with earlier standardization efforts.  Dolby Stereo, a revolutionary surround sound system, followed and allowed cinema designers to take acoustics into consideration when designing cinemas.  This innovation enabled audiences in smaller venues to enjoy comparable audio experiences to those in larger city cinemas.

Today, the future of sound in film remains uncertain, with potential influences from artificial intelligence, remastered audio, and personal viewing experiences shaping its development.  However, it is clear that the evolution of sound in cinema has been marked by continuous innovation and a desire to create more immersive and engaging experiences for audiences.

Colour

A significant technological advancement in the film industry was the introduction of natural colour, where colour was captured directly from nature through photography, as opposed to being manually added to black-and-white prints using techniques like hand-coloring or stencil-coloring.  Early colour processes often produced colours that appeared far from natural.  Unlike the rapid transition from silent films to sound films, colour’s replacement of black-and-white happened more gradually.

The crucial innovation was the three-strip version of the Technicolor process, first used in animated cartoons in 1932.  The process was later applied to live-action short films, specific sequences in feature films, and finally, to an entire feature film, Becky Sharp, in 1935.  Although the process was expensive, the positive public response, as evidenced by increased box office revenue, generally justified the additional cost.  Consequently, the number of films made in color gradually increased year after year.

The 1950’s: The Growing Influence Of Television

In the early 1950’s, the proliferation of black-and-white television started seriously depressing North American cinema attendance.  In an attempt to lure audiences back into cinemas, bigger screens were installed, widescreen processes, polarised 3D projection, and stereophonic sound were introduced, and more films were made in colour, which soon became the rule rather than the exception.  Some important mainstream Hollywood films were still being made in black-and-white as late as the mid-1960’s, but they marked the end of an era.  Colour television receivers had been available in the U.S. since the mid-1950’s, but at first, they were very expensive and few broadcasts were in colour.  During the 1960’s, prices gradually came down, colour broadcasts became common, and sales boomed.  The overwhelming public verdict in favour of colour was clear.  After the final flurry of black-and-white films had been released in mid-decade, all Hollywood studio productions were filmed in colour, with the usual exceptions made only at the insistence of star filmmakers such as Peter Bogdanovich and Martin Scorsese.

The 1960’s And Later

The decades following the decline of the studio system in the 1960’s saw changes in the production and style of film.  Various New Wave movements (including the French New Wave, New German Cinema wave, Indian New Wave, Japanese New Wave, New Hollywood, and Egyptian New Wave) and the rise of film-school-educated independent filmmakers contributed to the changes the medium experienced in the latter half of the 20th century.  Digital technology has been the driving force for change throughout the 1990’s and into the 2000’s.  Digital 3D projection largely replaced earlier problem-prone 3D film systems and has become popular in the early 2010’s. 

Image © unknown via Wikipedia

Salah Zulfikar, one of the most popular actors in the golden age of Egyptian Cinema.

Etymology And Alternative Terms

The name film originally referred to the thin layer of photochemical emulsion on the celluloid strip that used to be the actual medium for recording and displaying motion pictures.

The most common term in Europe is film while in the United States,  movie is preferred.

Archaic terms include animated pictures and animated photography. Common terms for the field, in general, include the big screen, the silver screen, the movies, and cinema.  The last of these is commonly used, as an overarching term, in scholarly texts and critical essays.  In the early years, the word sheet was sometimes used instead of screen.

Recording And Transmission Of The Film

The moving images of a film are created by photographing actual scenes with a motion-picture camera, by photographing drawings or miniature models using traditional animation techniques, by means of C.G.I. and computer animation, or by a combination of some or all of these techniques, and other visual effects.

Before the introduction of digital production, a series of still images were recorded on a strip of chemically sensitised celluloid (photographic film stock), usually at a rate of 24 frames per second.  The images are transmitted through a movie projector at the same rate as they were recorded, with a Geneva drive ensuring that each frame remains still during its short projection time.  A rotating shutter causes stroboscopic intervals of darkness, but the viewer does not notice the interruptions due to flicker fusion.  The apparent motion on the screen is the result of the fact that the visual sense cannot discern the individual images at high speeds, so the impressions of the images blend with the dark intervals and are thus linked together to produce the illusion of one moving image.  An analogous optical soundtrack (a graphic recording of the spoken words, music, and other sounds) runs along a portion of the film exclusively reserved for it and is not projected.

Contemporary films are usually fully digital through the entire process of production, distribution, and exhibition.

Film Theory

Film theory seeks to develop concise and systematic concepts that apply to the study of film as art.  The concept of film as an art-form began in 1911 with Ricciotto Canudo’s manifest The Birth of the Sixth Art.  The Moscow Film School, the oldest film school in the world, was founded in 1919, in order to teach about and research film theory.  Formalist film theory, led by Rudolf Arnheim, Bela Balazs, and Siegfried Kracauer, emphasized how film differed from reality and thus could be considered a valid fine art.  Andre Bazin reacted against this theory by arguing that film’s artistic essence lay in its ability to mechanically reproduce reality, not in its differences from reality, and this gave rise to realist theory.  More recent analysis spurred by Jacques Lacan’s psychoanalysis and Ferdinand de Saussure’s semiotics among other things has given rise to psychoanalytic film theory, structuralist film theory, feminist film theory, and others.  On the other hand, critics from the analytical philosophy tradition, influenced by Wittgenstein, try to clarify misconceptions used in theoretical studies and produce analysis of a film’s vocabulary and its link to a form of life.

Image © Janke via Wikipedia

The Bolex H16 Reflex camera.

Language

Film is considered to have its own language.  James Monaco wrote a classic text on film theory, titled How to Read a Film, that addresses this.  Director Ingmar Bergman famously said, “Andrei Tarkovsky for me is the greatest director, the one who invented a new language, true to the nature of film, as it captures life as a reflection, life as a dream.”  An example of the language is a sequence of back and forth images of one speaking actor’s left profile, followed by another speaking actor’s right profile, then a repetition of this, which is a language understood by the audience to indicate a conversation.  This describes another theory of film, the 180-degree rule, as a visual story-telling device with an ability to place a viewer in a context of being psychologically present through the use of visual composition and editing.  The Hollywood style includes this narrative theory, due to the overwhelming practice of the rule by movie studios based in Hollywood, California, during film’s classical era.  Another example of cinematic language is having a shot that zooms in on the forehead of an actor with an expression of silent reflection that cuts to a shot of a younger actor who vaguely resembles the first actor, indicating that the first person is remembering a past self, an edit of compositions that causes a time transition.

Montage

Read more about Montage here.

Montage is a film editing technique in which separate pieces of film are selected, edited, and assembled to create a new section or sequence within a film.  This technique can be used to convey a narrative or to create an emotional or intellectual effect by juxtaposing different shots, often for the purpose of condensing time, space, or information.  Montage can involve flashbacks, parallel action, or the interplay of various visual elements to enhance the storytelling or create symbolic meaning.

The concept of montage emerged in the 1920’s, with pioneering Soviet filmmakers such as Sergei Eisenstein and Lev Kuleshov developing the theory of montage. Eisenstein’s film Battleship Potemkin (1925) is a prime example of the innovative use of montage, where he employed complex juxtapositions of images to create a visceral impact on the audience. 

As the art of montage evolved, filmmakers began incorporating musical and visual counterpoint to create a more dynamic and engaging experience for the viewer.  The development of scene construction through mise-en-scène, editing, and special effects led to more sophisticated techniques that can be compared to those utilized in opera and ballet.

The French New Wave movement of the late 1950’s and 1960’s also embraced the montage technique, with filmmakers such as Jean-Luc Godard and François Truffaut using montage to create distinctive and innovative films.  This approach continues to be influential in contemporary cinema, with directors employing montage to create memorable sequences in their films.

In contemporary cinema, montage continues to play an essential role in shaping narratives and creating emotional resonance.  Filmmakers have adapted the traditional montage technique to suit the evolving aesthetics and storytelling styles of modern cinema:

Rapid editing and fast-paced montages: With the advent of digital editing tools, filmmakers can now create rapid and intricate montages to convey information or emotions quickly.  Films like Darren Aronofsky’s Requiem for a Dream (2000) and Edgar Wright’s Shaun of the Dead (2004) employ fast-paced editing techniques to create immersive and intense experiences for the audience.

Music video influence: The influence of music videos on film has led to the incorporation of stylized montage sequences, often accompanied by popular music.  Films like Guardians of the Galaxy (2014) and Baby Driver (2017) use montage to create visually striking sequences that are both entertaining and narratively functional.

Sports and training montages: The sports and training montage has become a staple in modern cinema, often used to condense time and show a character’s growth or development.  Examples of this can be found in films like Rocky (1976), The Karate Kid (1984), and Million Dollar Baby (2004).

Cross-cutting and parallel action: Contemporary filmmakers often use montage to create tension and suspense by cross-cutting between parallel storylines.  Christopher Nolan’s Inception (2010) and Dunkirk (2017) employ complex cross-cutting techniques to build narrative momentum and heighten the audience’s emotional engagement.

Thematic montage: Montage can also be used to convey thematic elements or motifs in a film.  Wes Anderson’s The Royal Tenenbaums (2001) employs montage to create a visual language that reflects the film’s themes of family, nostalgia, and loss.

As the medium of film continues to evolve, montage remains an integral aspect of visual storytelling, with filmmakers finding new and innovative ways to employ this powerful technique.

Film Criticism

Film criticism is the analysis and evaluation of films.  In general, these works can be divided into two categories, academic criticism by film scholars and journalistic film criticism that appears regularly in newspapers and other media.  Film critics working for newspapers, magazines, and broadcast media mainly review new releases.  Normally they only see any given film once and have only a day or two to formulate their opinions.  Despite this, critics have an important impact on the audience response and attendance at films, especially those of certain genres.  Mass marketed action, horror, and comedy films tend not to be greatly affected by a critic’s overall judgment of a film.  The plot summary and description of a film and the assessment of the director’s and screenwriters’ work that makes up the majority of most film reviews can still have an important impact on whether people decide to see a film.  For prestige films such as most dramas and art films, the influence of reviews is important.  Poor reviews from leading critics at major papers and magazines will often reduce audience interest and attendance.

The impact of a reviewer on a given film’s box office performance is a matter of debate.  Some observers claim that movie marketing in the 2000’s is so intense, well-coordinated and well financed that reviewers cannot prevent a poorly written or filmed blockbuster from attaining market success.  However, the cataclysmic failure of some heavily promoted films which were harshly reviewed, as well as the unexpected success of critically praised independent films indicates that extreme critical reactions can have considerable influence.  Other observers note that positive film reviews have been shown to spark interest in little-known films.  Conversely, there have been several films in which film companies have so little confidence that they refuse to give reviewers an advanced viewing to avoid widespread panning of the film.  However, this usually backfires, as reviewers are wise to the tactic and warn the public that the film may not be worth seeing and the films often do poorly as a result.  Journalist film critics are sometimes called film reviewers.  Critics who take a more academic approach to films, through publishing in film journals and writing books about films using film theory or film studies approaches, study how film and filming techniques work, and what effect they have on people.  Rather than having their reviews published in newspapers or appearing on television, their articles are published in scholarly journals or up-market magazines.  They also tend to be affiliated with colleges or universities as professors or instructors.

In 1986, Roger Ebert, winner of the Pulitzer Prize for Criticism said, “If a movie can illuminate the lives of other people who share this planet with us and show us not only how different they are but, how even so, they share the same dreams and hurts, then it deserves to be called great.”

Industry

Read more about Industry here. Read more about World Cinema

The making and showing of motion pictures became a source of profit almost as soon as the process was invented.  Upon seeing how successful their new invention, and its product, was in their native France, the Lumieres quickly set about touring the Continent to exhibit the first films privately to royalty and publicly to the masses.  In each country, they would normally add new, local scenes to their catalogue and, quickly enough, found local entrepreneurs in the various countries of Europe to buy their equipment and photograph, export, import, and screen additional product commercially.  The Oberammergau Passion Play of 1898 was the first commercial motion picture ever produced.  Other pictures soon followed, and motion pictures became a separate industry that overshadowed the vaudeville world.  Dedicated theaters and companies formed specifically to produce and distribute films, while motion picture actors became major celebrities and commanded huge fees for their performances. By 1917 Charlie Chaplin had a contract that called for an annual salary of one million dollars.  From 1931 to 1956, film was also the only image storage and playback system for television programming until the introduction of videotape recorders.

In the United States, much of the film industry is centered around Hollywood, California.  Other regional centers exist in many parts of the world, such as Mumbai-centered Bollywood, the Indian film industry’s Hindi cinema which produces the largest number of films in the world.  Though the expense involved in making films has led cinema production to concentrate under the auspices of movie studios, recent advances in affordable film making equipment have allowed independent film productions to flourish.

Profit is a key force in the industry, due to the costly and risky nature of filmmaking; many films have large cost overruns, an example being Kevin Costner’s Waterworld.  Yet many filmmakers strive to create works of lasting social significance.  The Academy Awards (also known as the Oscars) are the most prominent film awards in the United States, providing recognition each year to films, based on their artistic merits (but it has got so woke lately that is questionable indeed).   There is also a large industry for educational and instructional films made in lieu of or in addition to lectures and texts.   Revenue in the industry is sometimes volatile due to the reliance on blockbuster films released in movie theaters.  The rise of alternative home entertainment has raised questions about the future of the cinema industry, and Hollywood employment has become less reliable, particularly for medium and low-budget films.

World Cinema

Read more about World Cinema here.

World cinema is a term in film theory that refers to films made outside of the American motion picture industry, particularly those in opposition to the aesthetics and values of commercial American cinema.  The Third Cinema of Latin America and various national cinemas are commonly identified as part of world cinema.  The term has been criticized for Americentrism and for ignoring the diversity of different cinematic traditions around the world.

Image © unknown via Wikipedia

Most productive cinemas around the world based on IMDb (as of 2009).  Over 10,000 titles (green), over 5,000 (yellow), over 1,000 (blue).

Associated Fields

Read more about Film theory here, Product placement here, and Propaganda here.

Derivative academic fields of study may both interact with and develop independently of filmmaking, as in film theory and analysis.  Fields of academic study have been created that are derivative or dependent on the existence of film, such as film criticism, film history, divisions of film propaganda in authoritarian governments, or psychological on subliminal effects (e.g., of a flashing soda can during a screening).  These fields may further create derivative fields, such as a movie review section in a newspaper or a television guide.  Sub-industries can spin off from film, such as popcorn makers, and film-related toys (e.g., Star Wars figures).  Sub-industries of pre-existing industries may deal specifically with film, such as product placement and other advertising within films.

Terminology

The terminology used for describing motion pictures varies considerably between British and American English.  In British usage, the name of the medium is film.  The word movie is understood but seldom used.  Additionally, the pictures (plural) is used semi-frequently to refer to the place where movies are exhibited, while in American English this may be called the movies, but it is becoming outdated.  In other countries, the place where movies are exhibited may be called a cinema or movie theatre.  By contrast, in the United States, movie is the predominant form.  Although the words film and movie are sometimes used interchangeably, film is more often used when considering artistic, theoretical, or technical aspects.  The term movies more often refers to entertainment or commercial aspects, such as where to go for a fun evening on a date.  For example, a book titled How to Understand a Film would probably be about the aesthetics or theory of film, while a book entitled Let’s Go to the Movies would probably be about the history of entertaining movies and blockbusters.

Further terminology is used to distinguish various forms and media used in the film industry.  Motion pictures and moving pictures are frequently used terms for film and movie productions specifically intended for theatrical exhibition, such as, for instance, Star Wars. DVD and videotape are video formats that can reproduce a photochemical film.  A reproduction based on such is called a transfer.  After the advent of theatrical film as an industry, the television industry began using videotape as a recording medium.  For many decades, the tape was solely an analogue medium onto which moving images could be either recorded or transferred.  Film and filming refer to the photochemical medium that chemically records a visual image and the act of recording respectively.  However, the act of shooting images with other visual media, such as with a digital camera, is still called filming and the resulting works are often called films as interchangeable with movies, despite not being shot on film.  Silent films need not be utterly silent but are films and movies without an audible dialogue, including those that have a musical accompaniment.  The word, Talkies, refers to the earliest sound films created to have audible dialogue recorded for playback along with the film, regardless of a musical accompaniment.  Cinema either broadly encompasses both films and movies, or it is roughly synonymous with film and theatrical exhibition, and both are capitalised when referring to a category of art.  The silver screen refers to the projection screen used to exhibit films and, by extension, is also used as a metonym for the entire film industry.

Widescreen refers to a larger width to height in the frame, compared to earlier historic aspect ratios.  A feature-length film, or feature film, is of a conventional full length, usually 60 minutes or more, and can commercially stand by itself without other films in a ticketed screening.  A short is a film that is not as long as a feature-length film, often screened with other shorts, or preceding a feature-length film.  An independent is a film made outside the conventional film industry.

In U.S. usage, one talks of a screening or projection of a movie or video on a screen at a public or private theatre.  In British English, a film showing happens at a cinema, never a theatre, which is a different medium and place altogether.  A cinema usually refers to an arena designed specifically to exhibit films, where the screen is affixed to a wall, while a theatre usually refers to a place where live, non-recorded action or combination thereof occurs from a podium or other type of stage, including the amphitheatre.  Theatres can still screen movies in them, though the theatre would be retrofitted to do so.  One might propose going to the cinema when referring to the activity, or sometimes to the pictures in British English, whereas the U.S. expression is usually going to the movies.  A cinema usually shows a mass-marketed movie using a front-projection screen process with either a film projector or, more recently, with a digital projector.  But, cinemas may also show theatrical movies from their home video transfers that include Blu-ray Disc, DVD, and videocassette when they possess sufficient projection quality or based upon need, such as movies that exist only in their transferred state, which may be due to the loss or deterioration of the film master and prints from which the movie originally existed.  Due to the advent of digital film production and distribution, physical film might be absent entirely.  A double feature is a screening of two independently marketed, stand-alone feature films.  A viewing is a watching of a film.  Sales and at the box office refer to tickets sold at a theatre, or more currently, rights sold for individual showings.  A release is the distribution and often simultaneous screening of a film.  A preview is a screening in advance of the main release.

Any film may also have a sequel, which portrays events following those in the film.  Bride of Frankenstein is an early example.  When there are more films than one with the same characters, story arcs, or subject themes, these movies become a series, such as the James Bond series.  And, existing outside a specific story timeline usually, does not exclude a film from being part of a series.  A film that portrays events occurring earlier in a timeline with those in another film, but is released after that film, is sometimes called a prequel, an example being Butch and Sundance: The Early Days.

The credits, or end credits, are a list that gives credit to the people involved in the production of a film.  Films from before the 1970’s usually start a film with credits, often ending with only a title card, saying The End or some equivalent, often an equivalent that depends on the language of the production.  From then onward, a film’s credits usually appear at the end of most films.  However, films with credits that end a film often repeat some credits at or near the start of a film and therefore appear twice, such as that film’s acting leads, while less frequently some appearing near or at the beginning only appear there, not at the end, which often happens to the director’s credit.  The credits appearing at or near the beginning of a film are usually called titles or beginning titles.  A post-credits scene is a scene shown after the end of the credits.  Ferris Bueller’s Day Off has a post-credit scene in which Ferris tells the audience that the film is over and they should go home.

A film’s cast refers to a collection of the actors and actresses who appear, or star, in a film.  A star is an actor or actress, often a popular one, and in many cases, a celebrity who plays a central character in a film.  Occasionally the word can also be used to refer to the fame of other members of the crew, such as a director or other personality, such as Martin Scorsese.  A crew is usually interpreted as the people involved in a film’s physical construction outside cast participation, and it could include directors, film editors, photographers, grips, gaffers, set decorators, prop masters, and costume designers.  A person can both be part of a film’s cast and crew, such as Woody Allen, who directed and starred in Take the Money and Run.

A film goer, movie goer, or film buff is a person who likes or often attends films and movies, and any of these, though more often the latter, could also see oneself as a student of films and movies.  Intense interest in films, film theory, and film criticism, is known as cinephilia.  A film enthusiast is known as a cinephile or cineaste.

Preview

Read more about Test screening here.

A preview performance refers to a showing of a film to a select audience, usually for the purposes of corporate promotions, before the public film premiere itself.  Previews are sometimes used to judge audience reaction, which if unexpectedly negative, may result in recutting or even refilming certain sections based on the audience response.  One example of a film that was changed after a negative response from the test screening is 1982’s First Blood.  After the test audience responded very negatively to the death of protagonist John Rambo (a Vietnam veteran) at the end of the film, the company wrote and re-shot a new ending in which the character survives.

Trailer And Teaser

Read more about the Film trailer here.

Trailers or previews are advertisements for films that will be shown in 1 to 3 months at a cinema.  Back in the early days of cinema, with cinemas that had only one or two screens, only certain trailers were shown for the films that were going to be shown there.  Later, when cinemas added more screens or new cinemas were built with a lot of screens, all different trailers were shown even if they were not going to play that film in that cinema.  Film studios realised that the more trailers that were shown (even if it was not going to be shown in that particular cinema) the more patrons would go to a different cinema to see the film when it came out.  The term trailer comes from their having originally been shown at the end of a film.  That practice did not last long because patrons tended to leave the theatre after the films ended, but the name stuck.  Trailers are now shown before the film, or when the first film in a double feature begins.  Film trailers are also common on DVD’s and Blu-ray Discs, as well as on the Internet and mobile devices.  Trailers are created to be engaging and interesting for viewers.  As a result, in the Internet era, viewers often seek out trailers to watch them.  Of the ten billion videos watched online annually in 2008, film trailers ranked third, after news and user-created videos.  Teasers are a much shorter preview or advertisement that lasts only 10 to 30 seconds.  Teasers are used to get patrons excited about a film coming out in the next six to twelve months.  Teasers may be produced even before the film production is completed.

The Role Of Film In Culture

Films are cultural artefacts created by specific cultures, facilitating intercultural dialogue.  It is considered to be an important art form that provides entertainment and historical value, often visually documenting a period of time.  The visual basis of the medium gives it a universal power of communication, often stretched further through the use of dubbing or subtitles to translate the dialogue into other languages. Just seeing a location in a film is linked to higher tourism to that location, demonstrating how powerful the suggestive nature of the medium can be.

Education And Propaganda

Read more about Educational films here and Propaganda films here.

Film is used for a range of goals, including education and propaganda due to its ability to effectively intercultural dialogue.  When the purpose is primarily educational, a film is called an educational film.  Examples are recordings of academic lectures and experiments, or a film based on a classic novel.  Film may be propaganda, in whole or in part, such as the films made by Leni Riefenstahl in Nazi Germany, U.S. war film trailers during World War II, or artistic films made under Stalin by Sergei Eisenstein.  They may also be works of political protest, as in the films of Andrzej Wajda, or more subtly, the films of Andrei Tarkovsky.  The same film may be considered educational by some, and propaganda by others as the Film is used for a range of goals, including education and propaganda due to its ability to effectively intercultural dialogue. When the purpose is primarily educational, a film is called an educational film. Examples are recordings of academic lectures and experiments, or a film based on a classic novel. Film may be propaganda, in whole or in part, such as the films made by Leni Riefenstahl in Nazi Germany, U.S. war film trailers during World War II, or artistic films made under Stalin by Sergei Eisenstein. They may also be works of political protest, as in the films of Andrzej Wajda, or more subtly, the films of Andrei Tarkovsky.  The same film may be considered educational by some, and propaganda by others as the categorisation of a film can be subjective.

Production

Read more about Filmmaking here

At its core, the means to produce a film depend on the content the filmmaker wishes to show, and the apparatus for displaying it e.g. the zoetrope merely requires a series of images on a strip of paper.  Film production can, therefore, take as little as one person with a camera, or even without a camera, as in Stan Brakhage’s 1963 film Mothlight, or thousands of actors, extras, and crew members for a live-action, feature-length epic.  The necessary steps for almost any film can be boiled down to conception, planning, execution, revision, and distribution.  The more involved the production, the more significant each of the steps becomes.  In a typical production cycle of a Hollywood-style film, these main stages are defined as development, pre-production, production, post-production and distribution.

This production cycle usually takes three years.  The first year is taken up with development.  The second year comprises preproduction and production.  The third year, post-production and distribution.  The bigger the production, the more resources it takes, and the more important financing becomes.  Most feature films are artistic works from the creators’ perspective, e.g., film directors, cinematographers, screenwriters and for-profit business entities for the production companies.

Crew

Read more about the Film crew here.

A film crew is a group of people hired by a film company, and employed during the production or photography phase, for the purpose of producing a film or motion picture.  Crew is distinguished from cast, who are the actors who appear in front of the camera or provide voices for characters in the film.  The crew interacts with but is also distinct from the production staff, consisting of producers, managers, company representatives, their assistants, and those whose primary responsibility falls in the pre-production or post-production phases, such as screenwriters and film editors.  Communication between production and crew generally passes through the director and his/her staff of assistants.  Medium-to-large crews are generally divided into departments with well-defined hierarchies and standards for interaction and cooperation between the departments.  Other than acting, the crew handles everything in the photography phase such as props and costumes, shooting, sound, electrics, i.e., lights, sets, and production special effects.  Caterers (known in the film industry as craft services) are usually not considered part of the crew.

Technology

Read more about Cinema Techniques here.

Film stock consists of transparent celluloid, acetate, or polyester base coated with an emulsion containing light-sensitive chemicals.  Cellulose nitrate was the first type of film base used to record motion pictures, but due to its flammability was eventually replaced by safer materials.  Stock widths and the film format for images on the reel have had a rich history, though most large commercial films are still shot on (and distributed to theatres) as 35 mm prints.  Originally moving picture film was shot and projected at various speeds using hand-cranked cameras and projectors; though 1000 frames per minute (162/3 frame/s) is generally cited as a standard silent speed, research indicates most films were shot between 16 frame/s and 23 frame/s and projected from 18 frame/s on up (often reels included instructions on how fast each scene should be shown).  When synchronised sound film was introduced in the late 1920’s, a constant speed was required for the sound head.  24 frames per second was chosen because it was the slowest (and thus cheapest) speed which allowed for sufficient sound quality.  The standard was set with Warner Bros.’s The Jazz Singer and their Vitaphone system in 1927.  Improvements since the late 19th century include the mechanisation of cameras which allows them to record at a consistent speed and quiet camera design thus allowing sound recorded on-set to be usable without requiring large blimps to encase the camera, the invention of more sophisticated filmstocks and lenses, allowing directors to film in increasingly dim conditions, and the development of synchronized sound, allowing sound to be recorded at exactly the same speed as its corresponding action.  The soundtrack can be recorded separately from shooting the film, but many parts of the soundtrack are usually recorded simultaneously for live-action pictures.

As a medium, film is not limited to motion pictures, since the technology developed as the basis for photography.  It can be used to present a progressive sequence of still images in the form of a slideshow. Film has also been incorporated into multimedia presentations and often has importance as primary historical documentation.  However, historic films have problems in terms of preservation and storage, and the motion picture industry is exploring many alternatives.  Most films on cellulose nitrate base have been copied onto modern safety films. Some studios save colour films through the use of separation masters which are three B&W negatives each exposed through red, green, or blue filters (essentially a reverse of the Technicolor process).  Digital methods have also been used to restore films, although their continued obsolescence cycle makes them (as of 2006) a poor choice for long-term preservation.  Film preservation of decaying film stock is a matter of concern to both film historians and archivists and to companies interested in preserving their existing products in order to make them available to future generations (and thereby increase revenue).  Preservation is generally a higher concern for nitrate and single-strip color films, due to their high decay rates; black-and-white films on safety bases and color films preserved on Technicolor imbibition prints tend to keep up much better, assuming proper handling and storage.

Some films in recent decades have been recorded using analogue video technology similar to that used in television production.  Modern digital video cameras and digital projectors are gaining ground as well.  These approaches are preferred by some film-makers, especially because footage shot with digital cinema can be evaluated and edited with non-linear editing systems (N.L.E.) without waiting for the film stock to be processed.  The migration was gradual, and as of 2005, most major motion pictures were still shot on film.

Independent

Read more about Independent film here.

Independent filmmaking often takes place outside Hollywood or other major studio systems.  An independent film (or indie film) is a film initially produced without financing or distribution from a major film studio.  Creative, business and technological reasons have all contributed to the growth of the indie film scene in the late 20th and early 21st century.  On the business side, the costs of big-budget studio films also lead to conservative choices in cast and crew.  There is a trend in Hollywood towards co-financing (over two-thirds of the films put out by Warner Bros. in 2000 were joint ventures, up from 10% in 1987).  A hopeful director is almost never given the opportunity to get a job on a big-budget studio film unless he or she has significant industry experience in film or television.  Also, the studios rarely produce films with unknown actors, particularly in lead roles.

Before the advent of digital alternatives, the cost of professional film equipment and stock was also a hurdle to being able to produce, direct, or star in a traditional studio film.  The advent of consumer camcorders in 1985, and more importantly, the arrival of high-resolution digital video in the early 1990’s, have lowered the technology barrier to film production significantly. Both production and post-production costs have been significantly lowered.  In the 2000’s, the hardware and software for post-production could be installed in a commodity-based personal computer.  Technologies such as DVD’s, FireWire connections and a wide variety of professional and consumer-grade video editing software make film-making relatively affordable.

Since the introduction of digital video D.V. technology, the means of production have become more democratised.  Filmmakers can conceivably shoot a film with a digital video camera and edit the film, create and edit the sound and music, and mix the final cut on a high-end home computer.  However, while the means of production may be democratised, financing, distribution, and marketing remain difficult to accomplish outside the traditional system.  Most independent filmmakers rely on film festivals to get their films noticed and sold for distribution.  The arrival of internet-based video websites such as YouTube and Veoh has further changed the filmmaking landscape, enabling indie filmmakers to make their films available to the public.

Image © unknown via Wikipedia

The Lumiere Brothers were among the first filmmakers.

Open Content Film

Read more about Open content film here.

An open-content film is much like an independent film, but it is produced through open collaborations.  Its source material is available under a license which is permissive enough to allow other parties to create fan fiction or derivative works, than a traditional copyright.  Like independent filmmaking, open source filmmaking takes place outside Hollywood or other major studio systems.  For example, the film Balloon was based on a real event during the Cold War.

Fan Film

Read more about Fan films here.

A fan film is a film or video inspired by a film, television program, comic book or a similar source, created by fans rather than by the source’s copyright holders or creators.  Fan filmmakers have traditionally been amateurs, but some of the most notable films have actually been produced by professional filmmakers as film school class projects or as demonstration reels.  Fan films vary tremendously in length, from short faux-teaser trailers for non-existent motion pictures to rarer full-length motion pictures.

Distribution

Read more about Film distribution here and Film release here.

Film distribution is the process through which a film is made available for viewing by an audience.  This is normally the task of a professional film distributor, who would determine the marketing strategy of the film, the media by which a film is to be exhibited or made available for viewing, and may set the release date and other matters.  The film may be exhibited directly to the public either through a cinema (historically the main way films were distributed) or television for personal home viewing including on DVD-Video or Blu-ray Disc, video-on-demand, online downloading, television programs through broadcast syndication etc.  Other ways of distributing a film include rental or personal purchase of the film in a variety of media and formats, such as VHS tape or DVD, or Internet downloading or streaming using a computer.

Animation

Read more about Animation here.

Animation is a technique in which each frame of a film is produced individually, whether generated as a computer graphic (by photographing a drawn image), or by repeatedly making small changes to a model unit (see
claymation and stop motion), and then photographing the result with a special animation camera.  When the frames are strung together and the resulting film is viewed at a speed of 16 or more frames per second, there is an illusion of continuous movement (due to the phi phenomenon).  Generating such a film is very labour-intensive and tedious, though the development of computer animation has greatly sped up the process. Because animation is very time-consuming and often very expensive to produce, the majority of animation for television and films comes from professional animation studios.  However, the field of independent animation has existed at least since the 1950’s, with animation being produced by independent studios and sometimes by a single person.  Several independent animation producers have gone on to enter the professional animation industry.

Limited animation is a way of increasing production and decreasing the costs of animation by using shortcuts in the animation process.  This method was pioneered by U.P.A. and popularized by Hanna-Barbera in the United States, and by Osamu Tezuka in Japan, and adapted by other studios as cartoons moved from movie theatres to television.  Although most animation studios are now using digital technologies in their productions, there is a specific style of animation that depends on film.  Camera-less animation, made famous by filmmakers like Norman McLaren, Len Lye, and Stan Brakhage, is painted and drawn directly onto pieces of film, and then run through a projector.

 

Image © Janke via Wikipedia

Further Information

Blog Posts

Films: Angel Studios.

Films: Sound Of Freedom.

Films: Tim Ballard.

Notes And Links

Article source: Wikipedia and is subject to change.

Bence Szemerey on Pexels
– The image shown at the top of this page is the copyright of Bence Szemerey.  You can find more great work from the photographer Bence and lots more free stock photos at Pexels.

The Prof. Stampfer’s Stroboscopische Scheibe No. X animation above is the copyright of Simon Ritter von Stampfer and is in the public domain.

The Horse In Motion animation above is the copyright of Eadweard Muybridge and is in the public domain.

The image above of a picture of Ottomar’s Anschutz’s electrotachyscope is  copyright unknown as is in the public domain.

The video above of Roundhay Garden Scene is in the public domain.  You can read more about the film by clicking here.

The video above of Pauvre Pierrot is in the public domain.  You can read more about the film by clicking here.

The video above of Le voyage dans la lune is in the public domain.  You can read more about the film by clicking here.

The video above of The Bond is in the public domain.  You can read more about the film by clicking here.

The image above of a picture of Salah Zulfikar, is  copyright unknown as is in the public domain.

The image above of The Bolex H16 Reflex camera is the copyright of Wikipedia user Janke and is in the public domain.   

The image above of The Most Productive Cinemas Around The World is copyright unknown via Wikipedia.   It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 3.0).

The image above of The Lumiere Brothers is copyright unknown as is in the public domain.

The image above of an Animated Horse is the copyright of Wikipedia user Janke and is in the public domain.  It comes with a Creative Commons licence (CC BY-SA 2.5).

Creative Commons – Official website.  They offer better sharing, advancing universal access to knowledge and culture, and fostering creativity, innovation, and collaboration. 

IMDb – Official website.   IMDb is an online database of information related to films, television series, podcasts, home videos, video games, and streaming content online, including cast, production crew and personal biographies, plot summaries, trivia, ratings, and fan and critical reviews.   

IMDb on Facebook.

IMDb on Twitter.

IMDb on YouTube.

Wikipedia – Official website.  Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit in good faith. Its purpose is to benefit readers by containing information on all branches of knowledge.  Hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, it consists of freely editable content, whose articles also have numerous links to guide readers to more information.

Birmingham City: My First Home Game Of The 2023/24 Season Against Millwall On 02/09/2023

Image © Stuart Smith

There is only one team in Birmingham worth supporting with true passion and Birmingham City is it.  I have been supporting them since 1978 when Jim Smith was the manager.  He is my favourite manager to date.   I am a blue nose ’til I die.

You can read lots more about Blues by clicking here

Saturday the 2nd of September, 2023 was like any other day for me when I am stuck in the house on a match day.  I wake up, spend at least an hour in bed to let my brain catch up with the rest of my body, get up, have my breakfast, kill time, and watch the game on the telly.  Today was going to be a different day and a whole lot better for it.

Before The Match

As the game was a 12.30 p.m. kick-off, I woke up earlier than normal for a Saturday, at about 9.15 a.m. and it is just as well I did.  Around 15 minutes later my sister Julie rang me to ask if I was available in 30 minutes.  I said yes and asked why.  She told me my nephew Craig had a spare ticket and asked if I wanted to go. That was a no-brainer, ha ha.  I got out of bed around 9.45 a.m., had a quick shave, and was about to have a cup of tea and my breakfast when Craig arrived at 10 a.m. It was time to go to the church of Birmingham City supporters and I was buzzing.  St. Andrew’s hhyhbere we come.

We had left early so Craig could get a decent parking spot near the ground because traffic is atrocious around the Blues ground on a match day.

The journey was trouble free and after we parked we walked to The Royal George, a well-known, sought-out pub for Blues fans.  It was here where Tom Wagner and Tom Brady visited on Saturday, August 12th, 2023, before they attended their first Blues home game ever against Leeds United.

There we met Craig’s friend Stuart, who was with his son Alfie, and we collected our tickets.  Craig brought me my first pint of the day.  This was my breakfast! I would like to say it was a nice pint of lager shandy but it wasn’t, It tasted musty and off but I drank it anyway, it would have been rude not to.

Image © Frank Parker

Looking towards the Royal George, Small Heath, Birmingham.

After we all had a drink and chat we headed toward where we were going to sit, The Gil Merrick Stand which is next to The Main Stand.  Nearby is a poster of Blues most well-known goalkeeper and past manager, whom the stand is named after. There was an inflatable that was free to have a go at, where kids could try to score in different holes of different value points but regardless of what they scored, they got a free lollipop.  It is a nice way to keep the kids busy before they enter the ground and Alfie enjoyed having a go.   When we eventually move to a new ground (it is inevitable) the club needs to lay on more things for the kids to do than this though.  By this is a place to get a drink and a bite to eat.  This is fine for drinks if you are an adult but not so for kids.  Stuart couldn’t get Alfie a soft drink and this needs to be sorted out in the future.  This is not me nitpicking, just being honest and I have no doubt, that as we grow and grow, Tom Wagner will rectify all this. Craig got me another pint, just lager this time and we all had another chat. There was live entertainment via a man with his guitar and there is no doubt at all that since the new owners have been in charge, the match day experience and the atmosphere outside of the ground certainly has improved for the better.

With drinks down the hatch, Craig and Stuart kindly paid for a match programme between them (I always like to get a souvenir and this has improved a lot since I last got one) we entered the ground and climbed the seamless never ending steps to get to our seats.  This was a task Craig handled well being he was on crutches due to a recent injury playing football himself!

Image © Frank Parker

The Gill Merrick Stand entrance, St. Andrew’s.

Image © Frank Parker

A Gil Merrick poster outside The Gill Merrick Stand, St. Andrew’s.

Image © Frank Parker

The Main Stand, St. Andrew’s.

Image © B.C.F.C. via Twitter

Blues News v Millwall match programme 02/09/2023.

We settled into our seats at about 11.45 p.m., and not long after we all had a selfie.  It is said the camera never lies and this is clearly so by the bloody mark on my Blues top, ha ha.  Oh well, it is a great photo for memory’s sake anyway.

I took some photos of the ground, including the players warming up.  

Image © Stuart Smith

Inside St. Andrew’s, in the Gil Merrick Stand, for my first home game of the 2023/24 season with Craig, Alfie, And Stuart. 

Image © Frank Parker

Blues entering the pitch for a warm-up v Millwall at St. Andrew’s.

Image © Frank Parker
Image © Frank Parker

Blues players warming up v Millwall at St. Andrew’s.

Image © Frank Parker

Blues and Millwall players warming up at St. Andrew’s.

Image © Frank Parker

The big screen between The Main Stand and The Gil Merrick Stand inside St. Andrew’s.

Image © Frank Parker

Inside St. Andrew’s.

Image © Frank Parker

The Main Stand, inside St. Andrew’s.

Image © Frank Parker

The Tilton, inside St. Andrew’s.

Image © Frank Parker

The Kop, inside St. Andrew’s.

Image © Frank Parker

Beau Brummie at St. Andrew’s.

Just before the 12:30 p.m. kick-off, there was a short pyro display and blue and white smoke to thrill the crowd.  This is a new thing obviously American influenced by Tom Wagner and Tom Brady and I like it.  As long as they don’t bring cheerleaders into the game then a bit of razzamatazz does no harm to the game and adds some excitement to the atmosphere in the ground.  

This was the Blues team starting today.  Our new loan signing Cody Drameh goes straight in the first 11 to make his home debut with another new loan signing, Emmanuel Aiwu taking his place on the bench.

Image © B.C.F.C.

Blues v Millwall starting line-up.

First Half

Blues were kicking toward The Gil Merrick Stand so it would have been nice to have seen us score a goal being we had a nice, clear view of the net.  Alas, that wasn’t to be. Millwall scored an early goal against the run of play after a decent enough start from us and that knocked our confidence for almost 15 minutes.  John Ruddy should have saved their free kick. His form was off today and his passing was poor. We picked up the pace toward the end of the first half but again, against the run of play they scored a second goal but it was ruled out by a delayed offside call.  We had a late penalty decision when Keshi Anderson was fowled in their box.  This was taken by Scott Hogan that should have taken us level at the break but it didn’t turn out that way.   The penalty was weak and was easily saved by Matija Sarkic (who was on loan to us last season).

It wasn’t just Ruddy’s passing that was not good enough first half, the whole team followed suit and should have done better.  We didn’t deserve to be a goal down at the break.  We made Millwall look better than they were. The first half was very frustrating to watch indeed.  

I filmed a short clip of gameplay early in the first half.  Click here to see it.  As with the Pyro clip above it is clear I am no Steven Spielberg, ha ha, but it is all about sharing the experience of it all.

Image © Frank Parker

Blues and Millwall players leaving the pitch at half-time at St. Andrew’s.

Image © Frank Parker

Blues players leaving the pitch at half-time v Millwall at St. Andrew’s.

Half Time

Birmingham City 0 – Millwall 1.

Not a lot went on at the interval or at least I never noticed.  I was busy on my phone and chatting.  Stuart brought me a Coke and before you knew it, it was time to get back to our seats for the kick-off with Blues playing towards The Tilton End.

Second Half.

Blues played much better this time with plenty of chances to score but only one went in, a 53rd-minute goal from Jay Stansfield, making it two goals in two games.  I didn’t see the goal that well being it was down the other end and my eyesight isn’t the best but after seeing it in the match highlights it was a good goal with a great assist from Juninho Bacuna.  

As much as you do get a much better view watching Blues on telly, NOTHING beats being at St. Andrew’s and soaking in the great atmosphere. I wish it could be more often.

Stuart and Alfie left 10 minutes early to avoid the traffic.  I want to say thank you to Alfie for sharing his sweets today, that was kind of him.

Me and Craig stayed until the end, hoping for another late winner that never happened. 

Blues battled until the ref blew the final whistle, as we always do.  I would like to state that said referee, Josh Smith, was very favourable to the Millwall players with his decisions but that seems to be the norm for most refs when anyone plays us.  

Full Time

Birmingham City 1 – Millwall 1.

Regarding the crowd, the atmosphere in the ground was good but could have been better.  When it was loud it was loud but the crowd was too quiet at times and the Millwall fans were heard too much for my liking. 

Regarding the game, I felt like it was two points lost for us.  However, I am NOT complaining, the fact that we could feel disappointed with a draw when in the not-so-distant past we would have snapped that up is a sign of how improved we have become on the pitch.  Games like this would have ended up in a loss after starting from a goal behind and it is a credit to John Eustace for the good work he has done since being manager under dire circumstances.  If you want to call him head coach, you can but I am old school so I will call him our manager. 

After The Match

Me and Craig slowly made our way out of the ground and made our way to his car.  As mentioned above the traffic around the ground on match day is shocking, especially as it is on the 97 bus route, and it was a challenge just to get onto the road.  Slowly we made our way out of Small Heath and Craig dropped me back home thus ending my time at my first home game of the 2023/24 football season. 

Some of the best days in life are the ones that include unexpected surprises and today was one of them and I am very grateful to Craig for thinking of me.  

As we head into the international break Blues are undefeated in the league and are sitting in 4th place which is EXCELLENT.  I just hope what happened last season when we went into the break on form and then returned doesn’t happen again! 

Here is the top of the table after all Championship games were played today and match highlights. 

Image © BCFC

Blues league position in the Championship on 02/09/2023.

 

KEEP RIGHT ON.

Blog Posts

Notes And Links

The selfie image shown at the top of this page is the copyright of Stuart Smith.  All other photos are copyrighted to me except the match programme, starting line-up, and league position photos which are the copyright of  Birmingham City F.C. and have come from Blues social media pages and website.

Birmingham City F.C. – Official website.  

Birmingham City on Facebook  – This is their official Facebook page.

Birmingham City on Twitter – This is their official Twitter page.

Birmingham City on YouTube – This is their official YouTube page.

Blues Store Online – Birmingham City’s official club store online.

Birmingham City: Summer Transfers For The 2023/24 Season

B.C.F.C. Badge
Image © of B.C.F.C.

There is only one team in Birmingham worth supporting with true passion and Birmingham City is it.  I have been supporting them since 1978 when Jim Smith was the manager.  He is my favourite manager to date.   I am a blue nose ’til I die.

You can read lots more about Blues by clicking here

Thirteen players have been bought in this summer, either on a full contract or on loan.  

Unlike in the past when the clueless Chinese owned us and Harry Redknapp was the manager and spent money like a kid in a sweet shop (as exciting and crazy as it was at the time) Blues have been able to do all this within Financial Fair Play Regulations thanks to the savvy business experience of Tom Wagner (Knighthead / Shelby Companies).

All these signings are a great asset to a squad that will be utilised a lot during a tough league like the Championship and a special mention has to go to Technical Director Craig Gardner for his huge part in getting the deals over the line.  Well done Craig.

Image © B.C.F.C. via BCFC The Project on Facebook

New summer signings for the 2023/24 season.

Summer Transfers: 2023 – 2024 Season 

Click on the player’s name to read their profile.  This will take you to Birmingham City’s official website. 

Click here to see our full first team squad for the 2023/24 season.

Defenders 

Number 2: Ethan Laird.

Image © B.C.F.C.

Read more about Laird here.

Number 3: Lee Buchanan

Image © B.C.F.C.

Read more about Buchanan here.

Number 5: Dion Sanderson.

Image © B.C.F.C.

Read more about Sanderson here.

Number 12: Cody Drameh

Loan Player

Read more about Drameh here.

Number 44: Emmanuel Aiwu. 

Loan Player

Read more about Aiwu here.

Number 26: Kevin Long.

Image © B.C.F.C.

Read more about Long here.

Midfielders 

Number 6: Krystian Bielik.

Image © B.C.F.C.

Read more about Bielik here.

Number 11: Koji Miyoshi.

Image © B.C.F.C.

Read more about Miyoshi here.

Number 14: Keshi Anderson.

Image © B.C.F.C.

Read more about Anderson here.

Number 17: Siriki Dembele.

Image © B.C.F.C.

Read more about Dembele here.

Forwards

Number 8: Tyler Roberts.

Image © B.C.F.C.

Read more about Roberts here.

Number 28: Jay Stansfield.

Loan Player

Read more about Stansfield here.

Loan Player

Read more about Burke here.

Blog Posts

Notes And Links

The Birmingham City Club logo shown at the top of this page and photos of our players is the copyright of Birmingham City F.C. and has come from Blues social media pages and website, as has the subsequent information. The new summer signings for the 2023/24 season image came from The BCFC Project via Facebook.  Anything else is from Wikipedia.

Wikipedia content is subject to change.

Birmingham City F.C. – Official website.  

Birmingham City on Facebook  – This is their official Facebook page.

Birmingham City on Twitter – This is their official Twitter page.

Birmingham City on YouTube – This is their official YouTube page.

Blues Store Online – Birmingham City’s official club store online.

BCFC The Project on Facebook – This is their official Facebook page.